Their refined results enabled modelers to produce earthquake models that are more consistent with
observed subsidence measurements seen in today's instrumented earthquakes.
Not exact matches
Furthermore, nearly 3 meters of vertical uplift occurred, contrary to
observed terrestrial
subsidence.
This rate was significantly lower than the 1.2 inches / year calculated by Stephens and Johnson (1951), and Shih et al. (1998) speculated that maintenance of higher water tables after 1978 was one of the major reasons for the
observed reduction in the
subsidence rate.»
The authors
observe that wide variations in rates of tectonic uplift and
subsidence in different locations around the world at particular times mean no effective coastal management plan can rest upon speculative computer projections regarding an idealised future global sea level, such as those provided by the United Nations» Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
The sea level is increasing by about 1.3 mm / year according to the data of the tide - gauges (after correction of the emergence or
subsidence of the rock to which the tide gauge is attached, nowadays precisely known thanks to high precision GPS instrumentation); no acceleration has been
observed during the last decades...»