Sentences with phrase «observed the rise in»

Over the last couple of years, we've observed a rise in businesses seeking strategic communications support in Japan.

Lautz has observed a rise in home seekers moving in with friends or family to save money for a later purchase.

«It is thus extremely likely (> 95 % probability) that the greenhouse gas induced warming since the mid-twentieth century was larger than the observed rise in global average temperatures, and extremely likely that anthropogenic forcings were by far the dominant cause of warming.

If you've been eagerly watching the real estate market, you must have observed the rise in foreclosure inventories.

Paul S (# 1)-- Since the Planck Response dominates over positive feedback responses to temperature, wouldn't a La Nina - like failure of surface temperature to rise lead to an increase rather than a reduction in energy accumulation compared with accumulation during a surface warming — presumably a small increase, so that the observed rise in ocean heat content would still be substantial?

To clarify my above comment, I was suggesting that the observed rise in ocean heat content would be substantial with or without the La Nina effect, representing primarily the persistence of a long term warming trend.

Over the past 20 years, all the trends in the sun that could have had an influence on Earth's climate have been in the opposite direction to that required to explain the observed rise in global mean temperatures

I have seen no evidence whatsoever, that the graphs that you have presented proves that CO2 causes the observed rise in temperature.

Mann is saying more than that we can observe a rise in temperature and attribute it to anthropogenic CO2; like many others, he's saying that there are consequences for other natural processes and for human society.

That is the null hypothesis is that the currently observed rises in global temperature is the result of green house gases exclusively.

If someone could measure the increase in CO2 from current levels, and prove that an observed rise in temperature was caused by this increase in CO2, then climate sensitivity can be measured, and CAGW could be proven or falsified.

1938: Guy Callendar is the first to link observed rises in CO2 concentrations with observed rises in surface temperatures.

Li et al. also report that the vast majority of the observed rise in NPP occurred in the middle and high latitude regions, with 61.1 percent of the increase occurring between 30 and 60 degrees of latitude and 26.4 percent between 60 and 90 degrees of latitude of both hemispheres (see Figure 1c).

all the trends in the Sun that could have had an influence on the Earth's climate have been in the opposite direction to that required to explain the observed rise in global mean temperatures.

«It is thus extremely likely (> 95 % probability) that the greenhouse gas induced warming since the mid-twentieth century was larger than the observed rise in global average temperatures, and extremely likely that anthropogenic forcings were by far the dominant cause of warming.

Murry Salby who is suggesting that ocean and soil moisture data shows that the observed rise in atmospheric CO2 might well be entirely from natural causes and Roy Spencer who suggests that variations in oceans and sun affecting global cloudiness make it impossible to verify the sign of the climate system response to more CO2 in the air.

Then logically it will never be possible to observe a rise in temperature which can be shown to be caused by adding CO2 to the atmopshere.

Since urbanization has grown dramatically over the past few centuries, it seems reasonable to ask how much of the observed rise in global temperatures is due to urbanization.

Gavin points out that if Salby's model truly explained most or all of the 100 ppm observed rise in CO2 based on the 0.8 C rise in global temperature over the past century, that would imply a massive sensitivity of the CO2 flux to global temperatures.

It's easy to see that today (and for several decades now) anthropogenic emissions account for the entirety of the observed rise in CO2.

In short, this is one of those circumstances where the proper position for a skeptic is to be extremely skeptical of the claims being made (by Andrew Bolt, Jo Nova, etc.) that Salby's work will somehow overturn our understandings and prove that humans aren't responsible for the observed rise in CO2.

This mass balance argument establishes beyond reasonable doubt that the natural environment is a net carbon sink, and hence is not the cause of the observed rise in atmospheric concentrations.

The possibility that natural variability explains the century - scale observed rise in atmospheric CO2 can easily be dismissed based on simple accounting (anthropogenic emissions are larger than the rise itself, and thus account for over 100 % of the observed rise).

To sum up, the evidence that the observed rise in CO2 is anthropogenic is really overwhelming.

Neither conjecture is likely to be the explanation of the major cause of the observed rise in atmospheric CO2, but both conjectures are probably right in that the effects they describe affected the rise.

For each basic model we assume the anthropogenic emission (a) is having insignificant effect on the carbon cycle, and (b) is affecting the carbon cycle to induce the observed rise in the Mauna Loa data.

Now as it happens, I did more that wave arms, I gave a specific argument that demonstrates that anthropogenic emissions are responsible for the observed rise in atmospheric CO2 (the mass balance argument).

You don't need isotopic arguments to demonstrate that the observed rise in atmospheric CO2 is anthropogenic; there is a much more straightforward argument.

If one wants to just answer the simple and obvious question «Are human emissions responsible for the observed rise in CO2?»

By dividing the total temperature change (as indicated by the best - fit linear trend) by the observed rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide content, and then applying that relationship to a doubling of the carbon dioxide content, Loehle arrives at an estimate of the earth's transient climate sensitivity — transient, in the sense that at the time of CO2 doubling, the earth has yet to reach a state of equilibrium and some warming is still to come.

The historic period was also analysed, and the results showed that the models can accurately reproduce the observed rise in monthly heat extremes over the past 50 years.

2) Believe the warming effect is so small that any observed rise in measured global temperature is 100 % due to natural causes.

How much of the observed rise in Atlantic SST during the past 20 - 30 years is due to enhanced greenhouse conditions is also not agreed upon.

This model, when forced with observed sea surface temperatures and atmospheric conditions, can reproduce the observed rise in hurricane counts between 1980 and 2012, along with much of the interannual variability (Figure 5).

Norm, your first sentence is wrong, anthropogenic emissions are responsible for 100 % of the observed rise in atmospheric CO2.

No, Cawley paper contains a proof that man is 100 % responsible for the observed rise in atmospheric CO2, assuming that the carbon cycle obeys the principle of conservation of mass, which seems pretty reasonable to me.

There is far less methane in the atmosphere than C02, but that effect may well have contributed a couple percent to the observed rise in C02 levels.

«Over the past 20 years,» a group reviewing the data reported in 2007, «all the trends in the Sun that could have had an influence on the Earth's climate have been in the opposite direction to that required to explain the observed rise in global mean temperatures.»

«So how much does our burning add to the observed rise in atmospheric CO2 and how much is natural?

But in defiance of the naysayers who want to chalk the recent warming up to natural cycles, there is insufficient evidence that enough extra solar energy is reaching our planet to account for the observed rise in global temperatures.

From your previous posts on this thread, it seems you even doubt that the observed rise in CO2 is manmade, despite the isotope signature that proves this new carbon is of the fossil fuel kind.

The arguments is because CO2 is the only * known * external forcing that can explain the observed rise in temperatures.

Not exact matches

Obscure Dutch actor Frederik de Groot, previously observed head - butting surly criminals into submission on the detective series Bureau Kruislaan, rose to unlikely fame advising Canadians in clipped diction to «Save — your money» by moving their deposits to ING Direct.

Google observed the rise of tabloid cloaking in 2016 — meaning ads that looked like news stories but ultimately led readers to a site selling a product, like weight - loss pills.

«The rise in long - term inflationary expectations... suggests that part of the recent rise in headline inflation may now be expected to persist longer than previously thought,» the Paris - based group observed in the Global Economic Outlook released today.

«One of the largest increases in cocaine seizures in the past five years has been observed in Ecuador, where the amount of cocaine seized rose by over 242 per cent, amounting to 50 metric tons in 2014,» the UN's International Narcotics Control Board wrote in its 2015 report.

Thus, the path dependency that political scientist Paul Pierson, 1997 has observed in pension reforms is not just an observed fact, but a desired characteristic.21 Threats to sustainability are typically identified as expenditures rising above an acceptable level, and especially in prefunded DB plans, volatility of pension contributions or accounting expenses for pensions.

The chart depicts observed historical risk based on the performance of broad diversified indexes named in the disclosure for the chart «Drifting into risk as stock markets rise.»

An Orlando Sentinel story about the rise of such secondhand stores in central Florida observed a Clothes Mentor manager turning down several items brought in by customers, including an Ann Taylor Loft tank top that «just doesn't look as new as the other things.»

For example, in June 2016, Stratis raised $ 600,000 during an ICO and observed a 63,000 - percent rise in the price.