Not exact matches
# 92 Spencer el al 2007 paper doesn't really support the precise mechanism proposed by Lindzen for Iris effect, but more simply
observes a strong TOA negative correction associated with
warming events at 20 ° S - 20 ° N (that is: in the 2000 - 2005 period of observation, the most significative
warming episodes of the surface + low troposphere — 40 days or more — leads to a negative SW+LW cloud forcing at the top of the atmosphere).
... but more simply
observes a strong TOA negative correction associated with
warming events at 20 ° S - 20 ° N (that is: in the 2000 - 2005 period of observation, the most significative
warming episodes of the surface + low troposphere — 40 days or more — leads to a negative SW+LW cloud forcing at the top of the atmosphere).
The recent La Nina
episode combined with a quiet sun has almost wiped out the
warming observed over the past 20 years in a period of less than 2 years.
But there is no acceleration in the rate of
warming between that
observed in the late 1970s to late 1990s, and that
observed in the two earlier
warming episodes of 1860/80 and 1920/40.
The
observed global -
warming rate has been nonuniform, and the cause of each
episode of slowing in the expected
warming rate is the subject of intense debate.
Superimposed on the secular trend is a natural multidecadal oscillation of an average period of 70 y with significant amplitude of 0.3 — 0.4 °C peak to peak, which can explain many historical
episodes of
warming and cooling and accounts for 40 % of the
observed warming since the mid-20th century and for 50 % of the previously attributed anthropogenic
warming trend (55).
Yet, pre-1960 instrumentally
observed temperatures show many
warming episodes, similar to the one since 1960, for example, from 1915 to 1950, and from 1850 to 1890.