Not exact matches
A large number
of additional observations are broadly consistent with the
observed warming and reflect a flow
of heat from the atmosphere into other components
of the
climate system.
No model, however, has predicted the global
warming hiatus which
climate researchers have
observed since the turn
of the millennium.
While natural sources
of climate variability are significant, multiple lines
of evidence indicate that human influences have had an increasingly dominant effect on the
climate warming observed since the mid-twentieth century.
Tippett notes that more studies are needed to attribute the
observed changes to either global
warming or another component
of climate variability.
«Moreover, the latest developments in
climate science lend greater urgency to the case for action: Effects on natural systems are already being
observed and recent findings concerning the potential scope and magnitude
of damages from future
warming are increasingly worrisome,» the report says.
Now Muller says Berkeley Earth's new results «are stronger than those
of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change,» because they found solar activity had a «negligible» role in
warming observed since the 1750s.
A few
of the main points
of the third assessment report issued in 2001 include: An increasing body
of observations gives a collective picture
of a
warming world and other changes in the
climate system; emissions
of greenhouse gases and aerosols due to human activities continue to alter the atmosphere in ways that are expected to affect the
climate; confidence in the ability
of models to project future
climate has increased; and there is new and stronger evidence that most
of the
warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities.
On Wednesday, Dec. 17, at the American Geophysical Union's Fall Meeting in San Francisco, Noah Diffenbaugh, an associate professor
of environmental Earth system science at the Stanford School
of Earth Sciences, will discuss approaches to this challenge in a talk titled «Quantifying the Influence
of Observed Global
Warming on the Probability
of Unprecedented Extreme
Climate Events.»
Earlier spring leaf unfolding is a frequently
observed response
of plants to
climate warming.
Model simulations
of 20th century global
warming typically use actual
observed amounts
of atmospheric carbon dioxide, together with other human (for example chloroflorocarbons or CFCs) and natural (solar brightness variations, volcanic eruptions,...)
climate - forcing factors.
Therefore studies based on
observed warming have underestimated
climate sensitivity as they did not account for the greater response to aerosol forcing, and multiple lines
of evidence are now consistent in showing that
climate sensitivity is in fact very unlikely to be at the low end
of the range in recent estimates.
On time - scales
of a few decades, the current
observed rate
of warming can be used to constrain the projected response to a given emissions scenario despite uncertainty in
climate sensitivity.
These predictions are limited by a poor understanding
of the recent changes
observed in the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets, and a lack
of knowledge about the variability
of ice sheet behaviour under a
warming climate.
«Despite being very
warm, 2014 still leaves the
observed warming in the lower part
of the range
of climate model simulations.»
Investigating the cause
of 20th Century
warming is properly done in detection and attribution studies, which analyze the various forcings (e.g., solar variations, greenhouse gases or volcanic activity) and the
observed time and space patterns
of climate change in detail.
However, satellite observations are notably cooler in the lower troposphere than predicted by
climate models, and the research team in their paper acknowledge this, remarking: «One area
of concern is that on average... simulations underestimate the
observed lower stratospheric cooling and overestimate tropospheric
warming... These differences must be due to some combination
of errors in model forcings, model response errors, residual observational inhomogeneities, and an unusual manifestation
of natural internal variability in the observations.»
Another way to estimate
climate sensitivity from both models AND observations is to calculate the ratio
of observed warming to forecast
warming... then multiply that by the ECS value used in the model.
«The
observed pattern
of warming, comparing surface and atmospheric temperature trends, doesn't show the characteristic fingerprint associated with greenhouse
warming,» wrote lead author David Douglas, a
climate expert from the University
of Rochester, in New York state.
Investigating the cause
of 20th Century
warming is properly done in detection and attribution studies, which analyze the various forcings (e.g., solar variations, greenhouse gases or volcanic activity) and the
observed time and space patterns
of climate change in detail.
Warming of the
climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many
of the
observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia.
This is evident from the increasing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere, positive radiative forcing,
observed warming, and understanding
of the
climate system.
These results suggest that sea surface temperature pattern - induced low cloud anomalies could have contributed to the period
of reduced
warming between 1998 and 2013, and offer a physical explanation
of why
climate sensitivities estimated from recently
observed trends are probably biased low 4.
We show that
observed global
warming is consistent with knowledge
of changing
climate forcings, Earth's measured energy imbalance, and the canon - ical estimate
of climate sensitivity, i.e., about 3 ◦ C global
warming for doubled atmospheric CO2.
Investigating the cause
of 20th Century
warming is done in so - called detection and attribution studies, which analyze the various forcings (e.g., solar variations, greenhouse gases or volcanic activity) and the
observed time and space patterns
of climate change in detail.
The
warming mentioned here is due to the fact that higher
climate sensitivity is required to explain the
observed warming in the presence
of the sulphate cooling forcing).
Global
warming is the
observed century - scale rise in the average temperature
of Earth's
climate system.
For a start, based on what we know about the forcings and the
observed evolution
of global mean temperature, why would one expect
climate change to be a linear
warming since 1880 in Moscow?
Result: NS 2) «In reviewing the results, the IPCC report concluded: «No
climate model using natural forcings [i.e., natural
warming factors] alone has reproduced the
observed global
warming trend in the second half
of the twentieth century.
In the most recent Third Assessment Report (2001), IPCC wrote «There is new and stronger evidence that most
of the
warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities» This section is trying to cast doubt on the IPCC report, one
of the most comprehensive
climate change studies.
Therefore studies based on
observed warming have underestimated
climate sensitivity as they did not account for the greater response to aerosol forcing, and multiple lines
of evidence are now consistent in showing that
climate sensitivity is in fact very unlikely to be at the low end
of the range in recent estimates.
The
observed CO2 increase in the world ocean disproves another popular #fakenews piece
of the «
climate skeptics»: namely that the CO2 increase in the atmosphere might have been caused by the outgassing
of CO2 from the ocean as a result
of the
warming.
And in turn this
warm surface water is left in greater control
of the shorter time - scale
climate which we have been able to
observe during the instrumental period.
However, the
observed energy imbalance at the top -
of - atmosphere for this recent decade indicates that a net energy flux into the
climate system
of about 1 W m − 2 (refs 2, 3) should be producing
warming somewhere in the system4, 5.
Here we analyze a series
of climate model experiments along with observational data to show that the recent
warming trend in Atlantic sea surface temperature and the corresponding trans - basin displacements
of the main atmospheric pressure centers were key drivers
of the
observed Walker circulation intensification, eastern Pacific cooling, North American rainfall trends and western Pacific sea - level rise.
CAGW or Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global
Warming is the acronym used (mostly by those that don't support taking immediate action on climate change) for the theory (or collection of hypotheses) that attribute most of the observed modern warming to human activities and warn that continuing similar activities (mostly emitting CO2) could result in warming that is dangerous to both civilization and a number of ecos
Warming is the acronym used (mostly by those that don't support taking immediate action on
climate change) for the theory (or collection
of hypotheses) that attribute most
of the
observed modern
warming to human activities and warn that continuing similar activities (mostly emitting CO2) could result in warming that is dangerous to both civilization and a number of ecos
warming to human activities and warn that continuing similar activities (mostly emitting CO2) could result in
warming that is dangerous to both civilization and a number of ecos
warming that is dangerous to both civilization and a number
of ecosystems.
DSCOVR was designed to directly measure
climate change for the first time ever by
observing our
warming planet from the unique vantage
of the Lagrange Point — one million miles towards the Sun.
We have fairly high confidence that we
observe the history
of Heinrich events (huge discharges
of ice - rafted debris from the Laurentide ice sheet through Hudson Bay that are roughly coincident with large southern
warming, southward shift
of the intertropical convergence zone, extensive sea ice in the north Atlantic, reduced monsoonal rainfall in at least some parts
of Asia, and other changes), and also cold phases
of the Dansgaard / Oeschger oscillations that lack Heinrich layers and are characterized by muted versions
of the other
climate anomalies I just mentioned.
F. «The
warming of the
climate is consistent with
observed increases in the number
of daily
warm extremes, reductions in the number
of daily cold extremes and reductions in the number
of frost days at mid-latitudes.
Greenhouse gases produced mainly by the burning
of fossil fuels are altering the atmosphere in ways that affect earth's
climate, and it is likely that they have «contributed substantially to the
observed warming over the last 50 years,» an international panel
of climate scientists has concluded.
As in other
climate phenomena, there may be a multitude
of factors responsible for the
observed trends — but are Gray, Pielke, Klotzbach and Landsea really claiming that global
warming has no effect on SSTs?
Recognizes that
warming of the
climate system is unequivocal and that most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid twentieth century is very likely due to the increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations, as assessed by the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change in its Fourth Assessment
climate system is unequivocal and that most
of the
observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid twentieth century is very likely due to the increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations, as assessed by the Intergovernmental Panel for
Climate Change in its Fourth Assessment
Climate Change in its Fourth Assessment Report;
a) atmospheric CO2 from human activity is a major bause
of observed warming in the 1980's and 1990's, c) that
warming is overstated due to a number
of factors including solar effects and measurement skew d) the data going back 150 years is
of little reliability because it is clustered so heavily in northeast america and western europe rather than being global e) the global
climate has been significantly shifting over the last thousand years, over the last ten thousand years, and over the last hundred thousand years; atmospheric CO2 levels did not drive those changes, and some
of them were rapid.
As noted above, most earlier hindcasts
of 20th century
climate as well as current IPCC AR4 runs [Miller et al., 2006; Knutson et al., 2006] do not reproduce the
observed trends over recent decades in the AO component
of the circulation, and thus do not capture the intensification
of warming trends that has been
observed over Northern Europe and Asia.
A new study co-authored by Francis Zwiers, the director
of UVic's Pacific
Climate Impacts Consortium, suggests that human - induced global
warming may be responsible for the increases in heavy precipitation that have been
observed over much
of the Northern Hemisphere including North America and Eurasia over the past several decades.
Kosaka and Xie made global
climate simulations in which they inserted specified
observed Pacific Ocean temperatures; they found that the model simulated well the
observed global
warming slowdown or «hiatus,» although this experiment does not identify the cause
of Pacific Ocean temperature trends.
Result: the temperature record we use to define
climate contains a random mix
of these records with distinctly different characteristics — the ones with 7PM
observing time tend to produce
warmer climate estimates, the ones with 7AM
observing time tend to be colder.
«One
of the most significant signals in the thermometer -
observed temperature record since 1900 is the decrease in the diurnal temperature range over land, largely due to
warming of the minimum temperatures...
Climate models have in general not replicated the change in diurnal temperature range well.
'' -LSB-...][T] here is no substantive basis for predictions
of sizeable global
warming due to
observed increases in minor greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, methane and chlorofluorocarbons,» Lindzen told a gathering at the Heartland Institute's International Conference on
Climate Change.
Climate projections indicate that the likelihood
of more severe droughts, such as the one we're
observing, increases under global
warming.
The science is clear to me and to most experts in the various fields associated with
climate science: Humans are causing most
of the
observed global
warming in the past several decades and, if we continue emitting GHGs under a «business as usual» scenario, it will become increasingly difficult and costly to adapt to the changes that are likely to occur.