He goes on to conclude that the small fractional change in station wind - speed values relative to reanalysis values are unlikely to have caused a global bias in trends of Tmin in calm conditions approaching -0.1-C over the 50 - year period, equivalent to -0.02-C / decade, 1 / 10 - th of
the observed warming signal.
Not exact matches
and, «The
observed drying well exceeds that predicted in any of the GCMs as a consequence of
warming, even though we have not accounted for the impact of UT / LS moistening on the UTH
signal.
But a strong
signal is found in proportions of both weaker and stronger hurricanes: the proportion of Category 4 and 5 hurricanes has increased at a rate of ~ 25 — 30 % per °C of global
warming after accounting for analysis and
observing system changes.
«One of the most significant
signals in the thermometer -
observed temperature record since 1900 is the decrease in the diurnal temperature range over land, largely due to
warming of the minimum temperatures... Climate models have in general not replicated the change in diurnal temperature range well.
When internal variability is filtered from the smoothed
observed temperature (solid black line), the cleaned
signal (dashed line) shows nearly monotonic
warming throughout the 20th Century.
From what little
observed data we have, the
warming is negligible and the
signal can not be detected from the noise.
In other words natural variability dominates the
observed record making it impossible to detect any human - caused global
warming signal even if one were to exist (which there is no proof of).
Removal of that hidden variability from the actual
observed global mean surface temperature record delineates the externally forced climate
signal, which is monotonic, accelerating
warming during the 20th century.
That is an extremely large
signal (e.g., of similar magnitude to what we can easily
observe in the damage record between
warm and cold phases of ENSO).
As Curry
observes, an infinite number of statements could have been made, ranging from «it is extremely likely that the anthro pogenic increase in greenhouse gases has caused some
warming» (not very informative, since an infinitesimally small
warming is of no policy relevance) to «it is about as likely as not that greenhouse - gas - induced
warming exceeds the total
observed warming» (which indicates the size of the greenhouse
signal, but understates our confidence in attribution).