WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's election integrity commission will make public records requests to
obtain voter data from the states that have refused to turn over that information, the commission's vice chair said Wednesday.
Trump's election integrity commission will make public records requests to
obtain voter data from the states that have refused to turn over that information, the commission's vice chair said.
Not exact matches
Cambridge Analytica is under investigation in both the U.S. and the U.K. for the way it
obtained data on as many as 87 million users from Facebook and for whether it used that
data to target
voters on behalf of the Trump campaign in the U.S. and the Brexit referendum in the U.K.
As of November 7, more Republican - affiliated Pennsylvania
voters had cast early ballots than Democratic
voters, according to TargetSmart
voter file
data obtained by the NBC News Data Analytics
data obtained by the NBC News
Data Analytics
Data Analytics Lab.
This was a year after University of Cambridge researcher Aleksandr Kogan first
obtained the
data and around the same time that Cambridge Analytica, which was co-founded by Steve Bannon, sought out
voter data with financial support from the Trump campaign.
Its report about Facebook covering the period from 2015 to 2017 — a time during which Cambridge Analytica may have tapped Facebook
data to create «psychographic» profiles of
voters — found that Facebook's privacy controls «were operating with sufficient effectiveness,» according to copies of its reviews
obtained through open - records requests by the Electronic Privacy Information Center, or EPIC, a watchdog group.
More details have emerged about how Facebook
data on millions of US
voters was handled after it was
obtained in 2014 by UK political consultancy Cambridge Analytica for building psychographic profiles
Which does rather underline CA's priorities in this project:
Obtain, as fast as possible, lots of personal
data on US
voters, but don't worry much about keeping that personal information safe.
Reacting to revelations that the political research and consulting firm Cambridge Analytica
obtained Facebook user
data for the purpose of influencing
voters in multiple countries, the Internet Society called it «the natural outcome of today's
data driven economy that puts businesses and others first, not users» and called for «higher standards for transparency and ethics when it comes to the handling of our information.
As is now famous, the company harvested the Facebook
data of 50 million Americans that it
obtained via a third - party app, and used it to target
voters.
No doubt, it is a dismaying picture that confronts us: British company SCL Group, operating under the brand name Cambridge Analytica with the supervision of Steve Bannon,
obtained data collected from Facebook by Cambridge University academic Alexandr Kogan, and used systems built by
data scientist and whistleblower - to - be Chris Wylie to train its microtargeting algorithms to nudge scores of already - angry
voters towards electing Donald Trump and leaving the European Union — a set of experiments largely bankrolled by US hedge - fund billionaire Robert Mercer, 90 % owner of Cambridge Analytica.
The latest allegations — that a Trump campaign consulting firm with Russian connections used improperly
obtained Facebook
data on tens of millions of Americans to target
voters — raise disturbing questions about the roles of both Facebook and Russia.
It stands accused of harvesting Facebook user
data to profile
voters that that were ultimately targeted by the Trump campaign, which spent over $ 6 million on information
obtained by the firm.
No doubt, it is a dismaying picture that confronts us: British company SCL Group, operating under the brand name Cambridge Analytica with the supervision of Steve Bannon,
obtained data collected from Facebook by Cambridge University academic Alexandr Kogan, and used systems built by
data scientist and whistleblower - to - be Chris Wylie to train its microtargeting algorithms to nudge scores of already - angry
voters towards electing Donald Trump and leaving the European Union — a set of experiments largely bankrolled by US hedge - fund billionaire Robert Mercer, 90 % owner of Cambridge Analytica.
More details have emerged about how Facebook
data on millions of US
voters was handled after it was
obtained in 2014 by UK political consultancy Cambridge Analytica for building psychographic profiles
The tipping point appears to have been the recent revelation that a
voter - profiling outfit working with the Trump campaign, Cambridge Analytica, had
obtained data on up to 87 million Facebook users without their knowledge or consent.
Cambridge Analytica is under investigation in both the US and the UK for the way it
obtained as many as 87 million users»
data from Facebook and for whether it used that
data to target
voters on behalf of the Trump campaign in the US and the Brexit referendum in the UK.
Following reports that a
data analytics firm that worked with President Trump's campaign
obtained Facebook
data about millions of U.S.
voters without their authorization, members of Congress from both sides of the aisle are seeking answers from the social media giant and questioning what effect the firm's use of the
data may have had on the 2016 campaign.
On this week's If Then, Slate's April Glaser and Will Oremus dissect the latest fallout from the Facebook Cambridge Analytica scandal, wherein the profile
data of more than 50 million Facebook users was
obtained and allegedly used by Donald Trump's online
voter - targeting firm.
Mr. Sanni is friends with Christopher Wylie, a former research director of Cambridge Analytica who has recently provided information to journalists indicating that the company improperly
obtained the
data of 50 million Facebook users in order to help target
voters.
The Times and The Guardian revealed that the
data firm Cambridge Analytica improperly
obtained data on as many as 50 million Facebook users while developing software designed to influence
voters.
The company has been under a lot of pressure to be more wary of it handles people's personal
data ever since reports from The New York Times and The Guardian revealed that
data analytics company Cambridge Analytics had improperly
obtained and used the
data from 50 million Facebook users to influence
voters» decisions during the 2016 presidential election.
Over the weekend, the New York Times and The Observer of London posted a blockbuster investigative piece revealing that Cambridge Analytica, the firm brought on by the Trump campaign to target
voters online, used the
data of tens of millions of people
obtained from Facebook without proper disclosures or permission.
Which does rather underline CA's priorities in this project:
Obtain, as fast as possible, lots of personal
data on US
voters, but don't worry much about keeping that personal information safe.
More details have emerged about how Facebook
data on millions of US
voters was handled after it was
obtained in 2014 by UK political consultancy Cambridge Analytica for building psychographic profiles of Americans to target election messages for the Trump campaign.
The documents proved that the firm, where the former Trump aide Stephen K. Bannon was a board member, used
data improperly
obtained from Facebook to build
voter profiles.
Facebook is proposing only narrow countermeasures that address the specifics of the furor over Cambridge Analytica, a political consulting firm that's accused of improperly
obtaining data from some 50 million Facebook users for the purpose of influencing
voters.
Last week, it turned out that the personal information of about 50 million Facebook users had been
obtained without their consent or permission by
data mining firm Cambridge Analytica, which allegedly worked for Donald Trump's presidential campaign and the Brexit campaign, with an eye to creating a mechanism that would allow it to predict and influence
voters» behavior.
While the exact nature of their role remains somewhat mysterious, Facebook's disclosure suggests that the company improperly
obtained user
data that could have given it an unfair advantage in reaching
voters.
More details have emerged about how Facebook
data on millions of US
voters was handled after it was
obtained in 2014 by UK political...
More details have emerged about how Facebook
data on millions of US
voters was handled after it was
obtained in 2014 by UK political consultancy Cambridge Analytica for building psychographic...
This weekend, while Facebook was quibbling about whether the information used by Cambridge Analytica to target
voters in the lead up to the 2016 election was
obtained in a
data «breach» or somehow using fraudulent means, I decided to check my privacy settings.
Over the weekend, the New York Times and The Observer of London posted a blockbuster investigative piece revealing that Cambridge Analytica, the firm brought on by the Trump campaign to target
voters online, used the
data of tens of millions of people
obtained from Facebook without proper disclosures...