Not exact matches
In cases
where the dangerous condition on a premises is open and
obvious, people should reasonably be able to become aware of the
danger and avoid it.
Once we are part of your legal team, we will thoroughly investigate the situation to determine what caused your injury, whether the
danger was hidden or
obvious, and who was in control of the property
where the
danger existed.
«Because we conclude that a landowner has a duty to remedy an open and
obvious danger,
where he has created and maintained that
danger with the knowledge that lawful entrants would (and did) choose to encounter it despite the
obvious risk of doing so, we now reverse,» wrote Justice Cordy.
Additionally if the defect was open and
obvious, the Ohio Supreme court stated, «
Where a
danger is open and
obvious, a landowner owes no duty of care to individuals lawfully on the premises.»