The requirements of system coherence are met by including
all obvious elements of experience and by integrating them consistently throughout the model, Perhaps Whitehead's concern receives more definition as viewed from the negative side.
It is in terms of the second of these criteria that most philosophies exhibit misplaced boldness: «Failure to include
some obvious elements of experience in the scope of the system is met by boldly denying the facts» (PR 9).
The movement of descent, from the universal principle down to concrete reality, is of special importance in avoiding the pitfall of speculative «inadequacy,» in which «failure to include
some obvious elements of experience in the scope of the system is met by boldly denying the facts» (PR 6/9).
Not exact matches
The
element of truth in this view
of the supernatural is the
obvious fact that religious
experience is only possible to beings with mental or spiritual capacities, i.e., to human beings.
«Speculative philosophy,» writes Whitehead, «is the endeavor to frame a coherent, logical, necessary system
of general ideas in terms
of which every
element in our
experience can be interpreted,» but they «are not dogmatic assertions
of the
obvious; they are tentative formulations
of the ultimate generalities.»
3 The
obvious critical point to make
of Whitehead here is to indicate that his statement that science is true for each percipient is to claim to know something
of the
experience, qua scientific,
of each percipient, and hence to have admitted an
element of transcendence into the very statement
of the problem.
The
elements of his mixed cultural background and life
experiences are embedded in his artistic practice, albeit not always in
obvious ways.
MM: If your idea
of being «discriminated against» consists
of someone implying that adopting certain hipster lifestyle
elements make one look silly, then it's
obvious that you have never
experienced (or even seen) actual discrimination.