Regardless, the most
obvious flaw in this argument is that the planet wasn't warming 1,470 years ago.
Why haven't you pointed out
the obvious flaws in his argument.?
Not exact matches
The logical
flaws in this
argument should be
obvious, and thus should not have passed through the peer - review process.
The problem is a bias towards confirming what we already believe to be true can lead to an overly optimistic reading of the merits of a case and can make us blind to
flaws in an
argument that neutral outsiders find
obvious.