Not exact matches
While the authors opine that «the community education component» of the TNR project created what they called «a bystander
effect that motivated [residents] to take action on behalf of all animals in their care,» the
obvious mechanism was the
policy shift and practices of animal control officers in the target area.
Is it completely coincidental that EVERY progressive
policy related to energy / climate change has the
obvious side
effect, if not the stated objective, of RAISING the cost of energy and / or REDUCING its supply?
A classic example of «belaboring the
obvious», but the important thing to remember is: It makes absolutely no difference whether you (and I) are right about the «fitness for use» of the global temperature data base, A cursory examination of the actions of various Western governments over the past couple of decades, and recent US
policies implemented over the past few years, up until the Social Cost of Carbon regulations now coming into
effect, will show that we are having a strictly academic discussion.
One thing I would add — it ought to be
obvious (and I certainly hope it is) that a process of «winding back and decelerating the present form of capitalism», including «more social democracy, more regulation», will only be effective at mitigating the
effect of global warming (partially or wholly), if it includes a large suite of
policies specifically aimed at addressing global warming, that is, replacing emissions - producing activities or processes (particularly energy sources) with non emissions - producing ones.
There are many variables that can influence the
policy premiums you might end up paying for a New York renters insurance
policy, aside from the
obvious effects of changing deductibles and levels of coverage.
Although there are valid reasons for the
policies, it creates
obvious side
effects with public confidence in the national currencies taking a hit.