Sentences with phrase «obvious reasoning for doing»

If I needed to dig out one problem it would be that the framerate occasionally dips without obvious reasoning for doing so (though I can only claim this as a problem for PS4.)

There are both simple and less obvious reasons for them doing so.

Not exact matches

There does not seem to be any obvious economic reasons for large job and labour - force losses that would be isolated to these five cities.

4 Here there are obvious reasons for worry, which frankly I do not understand well enough to have any clear views.

For obvious reasons, I don't discuss specific models in full detail.

Some of the reasons flexible workers can be more productive are more obvious — for one, it can be easier to avoid distractions and get more done in less time.

We keep these discussions private for obvious competitive reasons, and we do not comment on speculation,» said Hall.

The analysis is painful to look at because along with the obvious misspellings I didn't even attempt to correct for whatever reason, the analysis doesn't do anything but spout off random stats I pulled from it financials and places like Morningstar.

«The best way to promote content is obvious, but not often done for some reason.

I don't see deferring the state pension until I'm 77 - 87 to be a brilliant choice for obvious reasons.

We resonate to the old rites of passage, and wonder what business it is of the State finally to set them aside, with no obvious reason, and with no clear mandate for doing so.

Other than the obvious health reasons for not allowing smoking one of the major reasons for changing the old policy of allowing smokers to take a break and non-smokers to work or stand in formation was it DID PROMOTE smoking.

The parallel between Athens and Vienna ultimately breaks down not simply for the obvious reason that no European city could ever hope to monopolize the culture the way Athens did when Aeschylus and the young Socrates strolled amid the statuary of the Acropolis.

Also, most of the muslims do not want to be on radar now a days for obvious reasons.

I kept waiting for them to list the obvious reason for the segregation but they never did.

I understand if you do not personally reply to this for obvious reasons.

This was done for obvious reasons, since it would be impossible for them to have s - e-x-u-a-l relations with the women that were under their care.

We're all different, and in truth we don't have a unified voice (for obvious reasons), groups like these «American Atheists» are just looking out for their own interests, they certainly don't speak for me.

Most people for obvious reasons don't like the state being observed by mind, and they say «the observer,» but this is a cop out: It is more honest to call it mind.

Religion is the first area where that becomes obvious, simply because the classic religions, for the most part and for various reasons, didn't keep up with the ongoing increase in general knowledge.

For some reason, folks that don't believe in some sort of supernatural deity find great joy in pointing out the obvious.

Traditionally fried, they don't often appear on our table for obvious health reasons.

I used organic chicken livers and I slightly adapted it by not using chilli for obvious reasons or frozen spinach — because I didn't have any.

I didn't include was the chilli (for obvious reasons) or the spinach because it's not in season at the moment so is flown in from Spain.

The ingredient listings do not contain any obvious ingredients that contain gluten, but for whatever reason they have not labeled them as gluten free.

I realize I am late to the game considering Elvis's legendary sandwich of choice, but for obvious reasons I do not look to The King for culinary inspiration.

I don't really make New Year's resolutions for the obvious reasons: «Resolving» to do things stresses me out and makes me feel guilty when I inevitably stumble.

I'm not generally a bagel fan — I remember them not agreeing with my stomach (for obvious reasons — gluten and I don't get along), but that was one delicious bagel.

let's face it, everyone and his brother has known what our deficiencies have been for several years, so why can't our management team seem to identify our weaknesses and aggressively target the necessary additions... the only plausible answer is we aren't willing to pay even close to market value for the players we clearly need and if we do actually get to the table we seem to make insulting bids that simple infuriate the team in question... for years Wenger has said he couldn't find any world class players to fill our voids, which seems to suggest that he thinks we currently have upwards of 40 world class players on our existing roster... if that is the case he should never be in charge of making personnel decisions... buying late in the window is so problematic, for obvious reasons, and especially since this year was supposed to be different (sarcasm)

He was like a lost sheep on the first goal, worse than a bag of potatoes on the corner on 2 - 2 (really should've marked Carroll better) and for 3 - 2 he was the direct reason Ospina didn't save it, AND he didn't mark Carroll, being such an obvious goal threat in those situations.

Obviously you can't fire McNugget for obvious reasons but you can bog him down so that he can't do anything.

it is said that MC they glance Alexis since chilean does not want to remain with us for obvious reasons, i think we can swoop him for kun at least to enforce also our team

Looking through the sources, there is little talk about Arsenal for obvious reasons, but there are a few regurgitated transfer rumours doing the rounds.

While their are genuine reasons for concern regarding the club's affair, it is also obvious to me that some of us have a real hatred for the manager, and will moan about any and everything he does.

I do nt want to see players such as Mertesacker, Arteta, Debuchy, Campbell, Flamini & Rosicky wearing the arsenal shirt next season for obvious reasons.

The reason is obvious, we don't attack with the ball, we make a run then because of Wenger's ping pong playing philosophy we stop and wait for other players to ping pong off.

Obviously I do not include my fantasy best manager, Guardiola for obvious reasons.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

As a first time offender, I imagine Conor will be given probation and perhaps some community service, and as long as he doesn't misbehave in NY during the subsequent six months (which shouldn't be a problem for obvious reasons), his record will be expunged.

I know it's a negative comment but interested to see who people think are the weakest links in the team, For me I would say Wilshere & Arteta, For obvious reasons Mikel given he has very little if any physical presence to dominate the centre of the park and Jack purely because it seems our style just does not suite the lad..

I don't watch too many RM games for obvious reasons, but do you guys think Wenger should have a look in for our DM position?

even when he suffered a serious knee injury, instead of accepting the fact that he would never stick his legs into the spaces that were crucial for someone with straight ahead speed to succeed, the club actually contemplated giving him a chance to play up top where his lack of physicality, size and holding up play talents would been on display for all to see... these are not the actions of a club that really cares about winning at the highest levels, but they are the actions of a club that wasn't interested in spending the necessary resources to purchases a world - class striker, which is usually the most expensive position on the pitch... instead we adopted the horrible phrase «like a new signing» and proceeded to allow this ridiculous experiment to carry on, which ultimately caused some discomfort on the training pitch and inside the locker room as players battled for a position that shouldn't have been theirs for the taking in the first place... don't get me wrong, I believe that Walcott is a talented player, who can help a team reach their goals, if their goals are relatively modest... just look at the teams who supposedly expressed interest in his services and they weren't the kind of clubs who aspire to win at the highest levels... as for the reasons why he hasn't been bitching and moaning about moving on just look at the wage benefits he receives from our club and his obvious desire to enjoy the societal advantages that come with playing in North London for a club with worldwide appeal... so instead of continuing to try to fix a coat with a broken zipper simply move on and buy a new and better coat

But if he doesn't make it, I won't be surprised for obvious reasons..

Don't expect to see him anytime soon in a gunners shirt for obvious reasons.

Only up until a year ago, did we actually start spending big on players, for obvious reasons like the Stadium expenses.

While the reason for United and Arsenal having an interest is obvious in that they need to fill that role in both their line - ups, it doesn't look as though Ndidi has any intention of leaving Leicester in the more immediate future.

Didn't deserve getting subbed but it was for obvious tactical reasons so made sense, but he was performing better than most of his teammates.

(For obvious reasons) Old Man Cech don't count, as he was looking to stay in London and our most popular brand players (Ozil and Sanchez) are not exactly rushing to extend their contracts.

I don't get many headed goals from corners, for obvious reasons.

One reason is that bowling is hand - tailored for sports fans who gamble, since it is practically impossible to rig a match without being obvious — and anyone who did would be barred for life by the American Bowling Congress.