Most of us are savvy enough to dismiss
obviously flawed conclusions such as «riots are caused by the presence of police officers», even though the police are present in much of the footage.
Not exact matches
This article (with all of it's typos and grammatical
flaws) is
obviously biased, as becomes more obvious given the personal experiences of the author and the
conclusions she has drawn from how she was raised and who she has become as an adult.
The «heads / tails» analogy to try to justify an opposite
conclusion (i.e. «climate in 100 years is easier to predict than tomorrow's weather») is
obviously flawed, for the reasons you point out.
This article (with all of it's typos and grammatical
flaws) is
obviously biased, as becomes more obvious given the personal experiences of the author and the
conclusions she has drawn from how she was raised and who she has become as an adult.