Sentences with phrase «obviously having no answers to the questioned»

The Gunners were humiliated 4 - 0 by a determined Liverpool side in our last game, with Arsene Wenger's Men obviously having no answers to the questioned posed to them by the Merseysiders.

Not exact matches

Martin: Asking you to answer a question isn't trolling but obviously you don't have an answer or at least you don't care.

You want answers to life's aggravating questions yourself, and you are obviously not yet in possession of those; I can't help but wonder whether or not this article was written precisely to provoke those you see as your opponents, simply to challenge them to give you something higher (you are the one who is searching, it seems)- than you have received through your own beliefs.

Obviously, it would take more than an article, more than a lifetime, and more than human wisdom to answer any one of these questions adequately.

This is an «I should know the answer to this» kind of question, but I'm not sure of the best pan to use for this: I have a regular nonstick skillet that isn't very deep, a cast - iron skillet that isn't very deep, and a Dutch oven that is quite deep (obviously).

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Now there is a question which opens a massive debate about how OUR club is run but the answer has got to be yes, I miss Highbury and to say I loved the clock end as a child through to leaving there for the grove as an adult is an understament, although the stadium has been a financial burden obviously it is still a wonderful place to watch football in, but football and especially Arsenal has changed so much in the last thirty years, I really am concerned about how much our supporters are charged either season tickets or match day sales including food / drink, we have removed a vast core of our traditional support and young because of these prices.

I will address several of your other points in a post that will be published tomorrow morning, but to answer the specific technical question you raised about platforms: It would have been much easier for us to simply use Change.org, which is a platform with which I obviously have a great deal of familiarity.

It is obviously very difficult to answer this question without having a large sample size interview.

Obviously one will have to be more guarded, but the problem is you need to give people an honest answer when they ask a question.

(You obviously don't have to answer this on the internet, since it's a personal question!)

To answer your question about what you never thought you would buy, well my answer is obviously a wedding dress!

A few profiles answered this question in such a way that would have affected my decision to contact them (were I single, obviously).

I recently had some traffic coming to my site where the people were obviously looking for the answer to that question so I wanted to briefly speak to this.

While these are obviously extreme examples, the answers to these questions has prompted researchers and educators to consider what roles schools play in the development of social responsible leaders and contributors.

David, I am curious if you have thoughts about insurance companies (especially P&C) hedging political risk... the answer to this question obviously will carry over to healthcare quickly.

And since this is the fourth week that I've spent writing on this question, the answer to those questions is obviously a bit involved.

Getting the best rate is obviously important, but mortgage brokers are also there to answer questions you may have about the borrowing process.

He's always ready to answer more questions and discuss treatment plans, has tremendous patience and sensitivity, and is obviously a profoundly decent, kind person.

We obviously couldn't answer such questions alone, and so we have turned to the industry's leading travel experts for some much needed insights.

Obviously if he doesn't want to risk violent revolution by answering the question, we can infer that his answer would be «Yes, the election was stolen.»

If anyone truly wanted to know the answers to the many questions, they'd employ real DBA's, with real databases, a real programing language, a couple of good programmers (the one writing the Harryreadme, was obviously a good one.)

«You can not be forced to incriminate yourself» fairly obviously includes «you can not be made to answer that question, if the answer would incriminate you».

In an breathless «expose»... an obviously inexperienced «investigative» reporter for a local cable news organization climaxed her over-the-top report by melodramatically bursting into a closed meeting of Sexaholics Anonymous «demanding answers» to her «disturbing questions» and expressing «frustration» that the startled sex addicts would not interrupt their meeting to sit down with her for impromptu on - camera interviews.

This is obviously the question most firms would like to see answered before they even want to interview you.

Milner avoided answering Cooper's general question, instead narrowing his response to the specific individual page the committee had flagged — saying it was «not obviously run by a group» and that Facebook had taken down the specific violent image highlighted by the committee but not the page itself.

However, if the answer to our question was a set of search results, rather than a text - to - speech reply, we obviously had to look at the phone.

I'd certainly have between 3 to 5 questions prepared in advance but then if the conversations are lengthy and a lot of your pre-prepared questions have been answered during the interview, then obviously the number could be reduced.

It's fine to approach a colleague and ask if they have a moment to answer a few questions, but don't interrupt people if they're obviously busy.

Obviously, almost no interview goes without tough interview questions candidates have to answer.

A lot of people who don't answer the question directly obviously have something to hide.

This is an «I should know the answer to this» kind of question, but I'm not sure of the best pan to use for this: I have a regular nonstick skillet that isn't very deep, a cast - iron skillet that isn't very deep, and a Dutch oven that is quite deep (obviously).