I think you need to educate yourself before posting a comment on something
you obviously need education on.
Not exact matches
I don't think anyone really disputes this — youth 13 and older
obviously also have
needs for care and
education but they're not the focus of this post.
I read your post with mild curiousity and decided that: -[1] You are sure not a Theologian; [2] You confuse B.S with theological fact; [3] You
need to recap lost opportuinties in the
education you so
obviously missed; [4] Your
need to pontificate indicates self - esteem issues.
However, some of the teachers in Portland are saying, «
Obviously the special
education students are going to fail and they are going to act out because we are not meeting their
needs... If there's not the right support there, that's not acceptable, not only for the child, but for the general
education teacher as well.»
Obviously, attaining these critical goals will require substantial resource infusions, especially for the high -
need schools that historically have been treated inequitably by state
education finance systems.
Listening to this show really helped me understand how effective, comprehensive character
education can be a part of the reform so
obviously needed in American schools.
''... The public
education system,
obviously,
needs to work better — we all know that,» he said.
A married people with a family
obviously has more financial obligations than an unmarried youngster and thus, he
needs a higher cover that can meet various financial obligations such as child's
education and / or marriage, repayment of loan, regular household expenses, even in your absence.