What will make people re-examine
some obviously wrong assumptions, and re-visit their theories?
Not exact matches
This is an
obviously wrong, but nevertheless useful,
assumption of how text is generated.
Obviously, judging from the male writers (who have supportive wives) and the people like me (no other income to fall back on) you are very clearly
wrong in your
assumptions!
The idea that everything on the Alarmist side is always right and everything on the Sceptic is always
wrong is
obviously a stupid and mundane
assumption, yet all you do is apply your «brilliance» to one side.