Sentences with phrase «obviousness does»

But the movie's obviousness doesn't matter, since it's the entertaining atmosphere that makes the film entertaining.

Not exact matches

momoya, but why didn't you provide me with a reasonable answer concerning the obviousness of atheism?

First off, Momoya does NOT have to provide you with a reasonable answer concerning the obviousness of atheism?

But again with equal obviousness, God's capacity to transmute and transform what is most certainly evil into an opportunity for good can not be denied by any Christian who has contemplated what we say God did with Calvary.

The trouble is that in venerating Darwin the man, we have detracted from the sheer, forehead - slapping obviousness of Darwinism the idea — at least in the minds of that section of the public that does not, you know, know anything about his science.

And I would argue that if we don't want to find ourselves 200 years from now still defending the obviousness of natural selection from those poor souls who would rather not grasp it, that unbearded, more braggadocious, more human Darwin is the one we should try to remember.

Accordingly, writer / director Crowe and his co-scribe Aline Brosh McKenna (I Don't Know How She Does It) create an exercise in obviousness, refusing to believe that viewers can comprehend the concept intimated by the title.

The dialogue and acting here are of above - average quality, though the actual story itself and directorial execution — though obviously done on a shoestring budget — are a bit less than stellar, suffering from a certain obviousness.

Despite a few catastrophes, only one happens to be shown on - screen, and the obviousness of the dummies used in place of humans doesn't allow this would - be disaster to pass the snicker test.

Despite the total obviousness of what they were doing, the writers used this opportunity to let the characters involved show a little emotional depth.

Now the point of telling you all that is who exactly do you think was an expert in the area of build - to - order back then who can judge the obviousness?

He made no attempt to do this, and his statement would be seen as a disservice when the obviousness of climate change surpasses his statement of uncertainty.

Some court decisions have interpreted this narrowly, stating in one instance, «I accept that a clerical error is an error that arises in the mechanical process of writing or transcribing and that its characteristic does not depend at all on its relative obviousness or the relative gravity or triviality of its consequences.»

Odom, though he disagrees with it, doesn't seem surprised by the outcome of the case, in light of the 2007 Supreme Court decision in Teleflex, which he has nicknamed «Obzilla,» for its vast expansion of the definition of obviousness.

What they are more willing to do over here (though they still prefer decisions to be based on obviousness or non-novelty) is that they identify the novel claim elements and then determine whether those are technical under the EPC.

Despite the blatant obviousness that being fired for being too attractive clearly disproportionately affects women rather than men, the Court seemed unmoved by arguments that equality does not necessarily mean identical treatment of men and women but may also necessitate proactive steps to protect vulnerable minorities.

It followed that the appellate court did not need to reach the issues of obviousness, claim construction, and divided infringement.

After a six - day trial, the jury awarded a complete defense victory finding that HTC did not infringe the asserted patent, and that the patent claims are invalid based on anticipation and / or obviousness.

The four - step approach to obviousness adopted by the Court is as follows: (1)(a) Identify the notional «person skilled in the art»; (b) Identify the relevant common general knowledge of that person; (2) Identify the inventive concept of the claim in question or if that can not readily be done, construe it; (3) Identify what, if any, difference exists between the matter cited as forming part of the «state of the art» and the inventive concept of the claim or the claim as construed; (4) Viewed without any knowledge of the alleged invention as claimed, do those differences constitute steps which would have been obvious to the person skilled in the art or do they require any degree of invention?

The four - step approach to obviousness adopted by the Court is as follows: (1)(a) Identify the notional «person skilled in the art»; (b) Identify the relevant common general knowledge of that person; (2) Identify the inventive concept of the claim in question or if that can not readily be done, construe it; (3) Identify what, if any, difference exists between the matter cited as... [more]