Sentences with phrase «occupier of premises in»

On that occasion we acted for the IC and were able to persuade the sheriff to grant our client a search warrant of which the occupier of the premises in question had no advance notice.

When does the occupier of a premises in Prince George fail to fulfil its duties under the OLA?

According to a release from the NIC, the compulsory insurance will cover fire and allied perils like flood, earthquake, the collapse of buildings, storm and as well, legal liabilities of an owner or occupier of premises in respect of loss of or damage to property, bodily injury or death suffered by all users of the premises and third parties.

Not exact matches

«What urgency requires that the occupier of a premises be given just 24 hours to produce a building permit of which he / she could not have been in possession?

The upshot of the decision in Schnarr is that waivers of liability will be valid if they relate to personal injury or property damage on a premises and are obtained by the occupier of that premises.

One of the basic purposes in enacting the OLA was to provide protection to occupiers who allow persons to come on to their premises for the purpose of recreational activities.

In the result, although because of the landlord's status as an occupier and as a landlady on whom an obligation rests to ensure the premises were reasonably safe for persons using them, the judge found the landlady at fault.

The Court concluded that the OLA was intended to be an exhaustive scheme «at least in relation to the liability of occupiers to entrants on their premises flowing from the maintenance or care of the premises.»

If someone is injured owing to the existence of the dangerous condition on the premises then that person can sue the owner for damages under the Occupier Liability Act in BC.

In general terms, the Act sets out the duty of care owed by occupiers of premises to persons who come onto those premises and specifies certain exceptions to the prescribed duty of care.

What are the challenges facing owners and occupiers of business premises in the North East of Scotland at the moment?

The Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006 places a statutory obligation on the owners and occupiers of commercial premises to ensure that they have arranged for such premises to be surveyed for asbestos and there is a plan of action in place on how to manage any asbestos found at the premises.

The OLA imposes on any «occupier of premises» a duty to ensure that an invited person «will be reasonably safe in using the premises.»

Under the law, occupiers owe visitors to their property a duty of care while they're on their property, both in terms of the condition of the premises, or the activity carried out on the premises.

Under the Occupiers Liability Act, individuals and entities that are «occupying» property in British Columbia owe a duty of reasonable care to all people who come onto their premises, whether as a customer, an invited guest, or a permitted passerby.

So, where a person gives a false address resulting in the search of premises, the occupier of those premises has a cause of action against the police.

This case demonstrates that importance of objective evidence in finding an occupier liable for failing to maintain the premises.

Premises liability cases arise in situations where an occupier or owner of land owes a duty to a person.

In a place open to the public, such as a shopping mall, or office building the occupier has a legal duty of care to keep the premises safe.

In Illinois, the Premises Liability Act, 740 ILCS 130, allows you to sue the owner or occupier of a premises when their negligence causes your injuries, but how liability is assigned can depend upon complex factors including legal nuances and agreements between the property owner and other parties who agree to be responsible in the event of an injurIn Illinois, the Premises Liability Act, 740 ILCS 130, allows you to sue the owner or occupier of a premises when their negligence causes your injuries, but how liability is assigned can depend upon complex factors including legal nuances and agreements between the property owner and other parties who agree to be responsible in the event of anPremises Liability Act, 740 ILCS 130, allows you to sue the owner or occupier of a premises when their negligence causes your injuries, but how liability is assigned can depend upon complex factors including legal nuances and agreements between the property owner and other parties who agree to be responsible in the event of anpremises when their negligence causes your injuries, but how liability is assigned can depend upon complex factors including legal nuances and agreements between the property owner and other parties who agree to be responsible in the event of an injurin the event of an injury.

An «occupier» is defined in the legislation as including «(a) a person who is in physical possession of premises; or (b) a person who has responsibility for and control over the condition of premises or the activities there carried on, or control over persons allowed to the premises...» An occupier's duty of care under the legislation is as follows: «An occupier of premises owes a duty to take such care as in all the circumstances of the case is reasonable to see that persons entering on the premises, and the property brought on the premises by those persons are reasonably safe while on the premises.»

9 (1) A police officer, or the occupier of premises, or a person authorized by the occupier may arrest without warrant any person he or she believes on reasonable and probable grounds to be on the premises in contravention of section 2.

By Michael Lesage In Ontario, the occupier of property is under a statutory duty to: «take reasonable care in the circumstances to make their premises safIn Ontario, the occupier of property is under a statutory duty to: «take reasonable care in the circumstances to make their premises safin the circumstances to make their premises safe.

Under the Occupier's Liability Act, an «occupier» is a person in physical possession of the premises, or a person who has responsibility for and control over the condition of the premises or the activities there carried on, or finally, control over persons allowed to enter the pOccupier's Liability Act, an «occupier» is a person in physical possession of the premises, or a person who has responsibility for and control over the condition of the premises or the activities there carried on, or finally, control over persons allowed to enter the poccupier» is a person in physical possession of the premises, or a person who has responsibility for and control over the condition of the premises or the activities there carried on, or finally, control over persons allowed to enter the premises.

The appellant sued the respondents alleging negligence, breach of duty of care, and breach of their duty under s. 3 (1) of the Occupiers» Liability Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O. 2, to «take such care as in all the circumstances of the case is reasonable to see that persons entering on the premises, and the property brought on the premises by those persons are reasonably safe while on the premises.»

His primary allegation was that the respondent homeowners, as the occupier of the premises on which the construction work was performed, were negligent in failing to provide him with safety equipment.

Put another way, to the extent that an occupier engages with members of the public for the use of the occupier's premises in return for payment, and thus creates a consumer agreement, the provisions of the CPA do not apply to that agreement.

In order to be liable under the theory of Premises Liability, the owner of land (or occupier, as the case may be) must have notice of the dangerous condition.

In Ontario, the Occupiers Liability Act governs this area of law and places a duty on property owners (homeowners, business owners, tenants) to keep their premises in a reasonably safe condition to prevent injury of visitors, for appropriate steps to be taken to correct any hazardous conditions and to warn persons of any hazards on the propertIn Ontario, the Occupiers Liability Act governs this area of law and places a duty on property owners (homeowners, business owners, tenants) to keep their premises in a reasonably safe condition to prevent injury of visitors, for appropriate steps to be taken to correct any hazardous conditions and to warn persons of any hazards on the propertin a reasonably safe condition to prevent injury of visitors, for appropriate steps to be taken to correct any hazardous conditions and to warn persons of any hazards on the property.