The science is clear to me and to most experts in the various fields associated with
climate science: Humans are causing most of the observed global warming in the past several decades and, if we continue emitting GHGs
under a «business as usual»
scenario, it will become increasingly difficult and costly to adapt to the
changes that are likely to
occur.
Atlantic salmon in north - west England will be affected negatively by
climate change because suitable flow depths during spawning time (which now
occur all the time) will,
under the SRES A2
scenario, only exist for 94 % of the time in the 2080s (Walsh and Kilsby, 2007).
But the scientific report in Nature
Climate Change suggests that under the «business as usual scenario» − whereby no steps are taken to address climate change, and the expanding the use of coal, oil and natural gas dumps ever greater quantities carbon dioxide in the atmosphere − then such conditions could occur once every decade or so befor
Climate Change suggests that under the «business as usual scenario» − whereby no steps are taken to address climate change, and the expanding the use of coal, oil and natural gas dumps ever greater quantities carbon dioxide in the atmosphere − then such conditions could occur once every decade or so before
Change suggests that
under the «business as usual
scenario» − whereby no steps are taken to address
climate change, and the expanding the use of coal, oil and natural gas dumps ever greater quantities carbon dioxide in the atmosphere − then such conditions could occur once every decade or so befor
climate change, and the expanding the use of coal, oil and natural gas dumps ever greater quantities carbon dioxide in the atmosphere − then such conditions could occur once every decade or so before
change, and the expanding the use of coal, oil and natural gas dumps ever greater quantities carbon dioxide in the atmosphere − then such conditions could
occur once every decade or so before 2100.