and value he identifies with
the occurrence of actuality for itself as opposed to its effects on others.
The passage seems to say that the ultimate metaphysical reality that underlies and expresses itself in every concrete
occurrence of actuality or value «envisages» possibilities both in pure abstraction and in their relevance for actual entities, as well as «envisaging» the actual entities themselves.
Thus on this account, though the realm of possibilities is eternal, the delineation of possibilities (universals) depends on
the occurrence of actualities.
Not exact matches
The reality
of it is this: that we incline to define ourselves, take the measure
of our
actuality, admit as educative and civilizing, acknowledge as relevant and powerful — only that in experience or reflection which is authenticated by its
occurrence within the biographical brackets
of the self's existence.
The nineteenth century saw the reality
of the «historical facts» as consisting largely in names, places, dates,
occurrences, sequences, causes, effects — things which fall far short
of being the
actuality of history, if one understands by history the distinctively human, creative, unique, purposeful, which distinguishes man from nature.
We have already seen how the
occurrence of contingent
actualities makes possible the delineation
of various possibilities.