Sentences with phrase «ocean air then»

We loved getting up early and taking in the fresh ocean air then off to a beautiful easy walk across the whole ranch with breathtaking views.

Not exact matches

In the 1960s and 1970s, the British government expelled the entire population of the small Indian Ocean archipelago, then promptly leased the largest of the islands, Diego Garcia, to the United States for a military air base.

Global climate models need to account for what Meehl calls «slowly varying systems» — how warmer air gradually heats the ocean, for example, and what effect this warming ocean then has on the air.

The Amazon produces roughly a third of its own precipitation — trees release moist air that then falls back as rain to nourish other trees (the rest comes from the Atlantic Ocean).

So, for example, a big part of what drives a hurricane is the fact that you've got a lot of warm water near the surface of the ocean that is transferring heat into the air, and that's what's moving up, and that is a big part of then what's propelling the entire bigger storm system.

Tiny air bubbles form in the ocean when waves break, then rise to the surface and burst, releasing gases and aerosols into the atmosphere.

Launching on four legs, the pterosaur would have flapped its wings till it caught these small pockets of warm air rising from ocean or hot land, and then coasted easily on these for several hours.

Habib explains that it would have been able to cross broad stretches of ocean by taking advantage of thermals (rising columns of air created over warmer - than - normal patches of ocean) to gain altitude, then gliding until it reached the next thermal.

The method consists of supplying bubbles of compressed air from a perforated pipe lowered in the water, which then rise, taking with them colder water from deeper in the ocean.

If people reduce the amount of carbon dioxide they put in the air, then less will end up in the ocean.

But if people reduce the amount of carbon dioxide they put in the air, then less will end up in the ocean.

To stay within the budget, global emissions would have to peak by 2020, and then become negative — with more CO2 being taken out of the atmosphere by plants and the oceans than is put into the air each year — by 2090.

Westerly winds took America's dirty air out over the Atlantic, while the pollution from Europe blew south and then west over the ocean with the trade winds.

Mel warned me to wear boots and not heels because we would be walking on grass and dirt, so what else would be better than my cowboy boots from 4th & Ocean!!!! Then for the cold night air I relied on my olive green coat from www.sophieandtrey.com!

Chronologically, it follows the life of a wayward immigrant Italian boy who changed his ways, goes on to become an Olympic athlete, only to enlist in WWII as an Air force bombardier who then emergency crash - lands in the Pacific Ocean.

And then there are the considerable opportunities in Poipu for shopping and dining, including the above - mentioned Grand Hyatt but also outstanding RumFire Poipu Beach at the Sheraton Kauai (with some of the finest ocean views of any restaurant on the island), plus myriad eateries at both Poipu Shopping Village (we like Papalani Gelato, Puka Dog, and Keoki's Paradise in particular) and the newer and swankier Kukui'ula Village Shopping Center, an open - air retail and entertainment village with a Wednesday - afternoon farmers market as well as several excellent restaurants, including Tortilla Republic Grill, Merriman's Fish House, Roy Yamaguchi's Eating House 1849, and Living Foods Market & Cafe.

In Radical Fishing, players drop their hook into the ocean, lowering it as deep as possible, pulling back fish / jellyfish / sharks to the surface, then throwing them into air to watch them explode.

Is it just folklore that hurricanes (I think these are TC's) occur due to warm ocean water that causes air to rise over a region, drawing in air that then develops into circular winds?

If in exceeds out and the diffential MUST exist from top to bottom of the atmosphere, then before the hotter air can migrate to the deep ocean, the daily temerature cycling will force the hotter air at the bottom into an overall equlibrium ie hotter air will rise — or more correctly since GHGs have heated the air up more at the bottom, then the sun induced daily warming will add more heat to the top, & less at the bottom to force the equilibrium — ie effectively hot air rising even if not in actuality.

If extra human CO2 does warm the top millimetre of the ocean a little before the extra down welling infrared radiation is bounced back up by the almost impermeable ocean surface then the air immediately above the ocean surface will promptly warm up.

On the other hand, if the air cooled over Siberia, then was transported by bulk flow over the ocean, then the ocean began to freeze, the air would warm up a lot.

By analogy, if the PDO arises from air - sea interactions that require 10 year ocean adjustment times, then aspects of the phenomenon will be (in theory) predictable at lead times of up to 10 years.

They then infill the Arctic and Southern Oceans with land surface air temperature data.

He's saying the oceans could suddenly start sequestering so much of the energy arriving at the earth each day that the surface air temperature would go flat, and then...

IF we had say, a bowl of frigid ocean water — and we immersed a sun warmed rock into that bowl of frigid ocean water, till 70 % of it was covered — then whipped the exposed surface of the rock with air that was many degrees colder than the exposed rock surface --

However, there is also the expansion of the Hadley Cells where water vapor from tropical ocean evaporation rises, water in the form of rain falls out as the air cools with increased altitude, then dry air descends at poleward edge of the cells in the dry subtropics.

Then temporarily the net fluxes are: Space — > Ocean = 240, Ocean — > Air = 235, Air — > Space = 235.

So if the DLR is not heating the ocean, and we know less than a quarter of it is going into evaporation, and it's not heating the air... then where is it going?

If the sun is primarily responsible for observed global air temperature changes (even if heavily modulated by ocean behaviour as I contend elsewhere) then we need to know sooner rather than later otherwise a misdiagnosis of the causes of climate change could cause unimaginable disruption and hardship through the imposition of incorrect remedies.

As the ocean warms, more H2O (and CO2) will outgas, which will raise the specific humidity of the air thus leading to amplification of the GHG effect, and then spreading to land areas.

Since then there are a number of papers published on why the warming was statistically insignificant including a recent one by Richardson et al. 2016 which tries to explain that the models were projecting a global tas (temperature air surface) but the actual observations are a combination of tas (land) and SST oceans, meaning projected warming shouldn't be as much as projected.

The cores coming out of the ocean floor indeed showed slow changes, and so did the ice core from Antarctica — but few understood then about how special Antarctica is, how insulated from the rest of the world its weather can be (that ring of westerlies and its vertical curtain of rising air at 60 ° S) and how its low rates of snowfall limit time resolution.

If the 1.441 mm depth had warmed by 0.700 C same as the ocean - air interface then oceans would gain no heat, but the massive colder oceans below will only let 1.441 mm to < several tens - to - hundreds of metres > depth warm by 0.697 C and only when the entire ocean has warmed by 0.700 C in a few thousand years will it let that 1.441 mm depth warm the final 0.003 C and stop heat gain with 4,100 ZettaJoules of heat having been added to the oceans, enough to melt 13,666,666 cubic kilometres of ice.

Values such as 0.70000 C are not known with this precision but precision is irrelevant because it is the residual of the 0.7 C anomaly (computed here as 0.003 C per 1.441 mm of near - surface depth for 2000 - 2010, 0.00538 C for 2013) that is adding the ocean heat, so if actual at ocean - air interface were, say, 0.726 C then it must be 0.723 C at 1.441 mm depth to reduce upward flux by 1.21 w / m ** 2 and cause the measured +138 ZettaJoules / decade.

Fig 4 But Non-coastal stations can be divided further into Ocean Air Affected stations («OAA», marked yellow) and then Ocean Air Shelter stations («OAS», marked blue).

On my religion: I am honest when I say to you that there seem to be no warming in areas over land in areas where ocean air do not dominate temperature trends, then its true.

Is it fair then to call the missing warming after around 1930 - 1940 of areas in shelter of ocean air a global problem for the CO2 - theory?

If polar vortices are driven further and further south, drawing up warmer air from middle latitudes toward the pole and supplanting them with Arctic chill, then many nations might experience cooling, while the generally unmonitored Arctic Circle region experiences substantial restructuring of sea ice as well as surface warming and deep ocean warming too.

The A in PIOMAS stands for assimilation - it assimilates NCEP / NCAR wind and air temperature fields that then drive the ice / ocean components.

As (relatively) warmer tropical air slowly circulated (colder poles), first Earth's polar oceans would freeze, then the mid-latitudes, then even the equatorial oceans.

You might then see the error in your remark «the only way to convince them is to show evidence that CO2 is not causing the air and ocean temps to rise and find a suitable natural explanation.»

2) If minor changes in the air attempt to make the air temperature alone diverge from that equilibrium then the weather systems change to modify the energy flow and in due course restore the surface air temperature to match the sea surface temperature set by the oceans.

The global warming trend or cooling trend in the air, initiated by the oceans, then leads on to all the variations in both circulations that seem to be causing so much puzzlement.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

The warmer skin then alters the temperature profile just below the surface and reduces the normal flow of energy from ocean to air.

And since the temperature difference between the Arctic and the tropics is narrowing, and since it's the temperature difference that drives wind and ocean currents, then the jet stream that normally whizzes around the Arctic circle — thus keeping frozen air in one place and separating it from the warm breezes of the south — is, the theory goes, slowing, thus allowing warm moist air to penetrate into the north.

If we now start to see true cooling in the oceans first and then the air I would not be surprised.

Such oceanic temperature as now subsists would probably be a historical inheritance from a long past state possibly at the end of the last ice age when it was reset by a combination of changed energy throughput from the sun plus the resistor effect of the oceans and air combined with the then state of the air circulation.

Thus, when the ocean circulations increase the resistor efficiency of the oceans by slowing the release of energy into the air then the air follows by increasing it's own resistor efficiency by exposing less equatorial air to space.

If the energy budget of the air is maintained in balance by means of the weather systems neutralising changes in the power of the resistor effect in the air alone (more CO2) and changes in energy received from the oceans (ocean cycles) then the only remaining factor requiring consideration at any particular time is total throughput of energy from the sun (the electric current in the resistor analogy).