The observed climate is just the equilibrium response to such variations with the positions of the air circulation systems and the speed of the hydrological cycle always adjusting to bring energy differentials between all the many
ocean and atmosphere layers back towards equilibrium (Wilde's Law?).
Not exact matches
However, the Clark School researchers say blue whirls could improve remediation - by - combustion approaches by burning the oil
layer with increased efficiency, reducing harmful emissions into the
atmosphere around it
and the
ocean beneath it.
But a an iridium
layer - like defining geological boundary is most relevant because of the associated changes - most notably, changes to the chemistry of the
atmosphere and ocean.
Without the ozone
layer, ultraviolet rays from the sun would reach the surface at nearly full force, causing skin cancer
and, more seriously, killing off the tiny photosynthetic plankton in the
ocean that provide oxygen to the
atmosphere and bolster the bottom of the food chain.
If we think of hurricanes as Stirling heat engines, then we realize that the two reservoirs are the mixed
layer of the surface
ocean (1)
and the upper
atmosphere (2); note that there is a general trend of stratospheric cooling as well.
From the gravity data we received from the Voyager flybys in 1986 (Uranus)
and 1989 (Neptune),
and from watching how the Uranian rings move, it appears that the planets are not simple, three -
layer objects, with the densest rock in the center, surrounded by
ocean with a hydrogen / helium
atmosphere above it all.
This means that an increase in temperature
and the associated reorganization in
ocean circulation, for instance, had less of an effect on the marine ecosystem's ability to absorb CO2 from the
atmosphere and store it in the subsurface
layers of the
ocean.
Stuck to their calcium carbonate platelets, organic matter sinks to the
ocean floor — allowing surface
layers to take up a new carbon dioxide from the
atmosphere and process it.
And a «lot of water» here means hundreds or thousands of Earth
oceans's worth of water, completely covering the silicate mantle of the planets, most likely in hundreds of km - thick high - pressure water ice
layers, below thick liquid
oceans or high - pressure steam
atmospheres.
Increased warming of the cool skin
layer (via increased greenhouse gases) lowers its temperature gradient (that is the temperature difference between the top
and bottom of the
layer),
and this reduces the rate at which heat flows out of the
ocean to the
atmosphere.
ENSO events, for example, can warm or cool
ocean surface temperatures through exchange of heat between the surface
and the reservoir stored beneath the oceanic mixed
layer,
and by changing the distribution
and extent of cloud cover (which influences the radiative balance in the lower
atmosphere).
In the
oceans, warmer weather is driving stronger winds that are exposing deeper
layers of water, which are already saturated with carbon
and not as able to absorb as much from the
atmosphere.
mixed
layer is oceanographically absurd is that all sorts of well - observed facets of the
ocean go haywire if you assume a mixed
layer to that depth — seasonal cycle, C14, CFC's,
and for that matter the rate of removal of CO2 from the
atmosphere.
ENSO events, for example, can warm or cool
ocean surface temperatures through exchange of heat between the surface
and the reservoir stored beneath the oceanic mixed
layer,
and by changing the distribution
and extent of cloud cover (which influences the radiative balance in the lower
atmosphere).
If one divides the earth into 50x50km blocks then I suppose that's about 200k grid points (times however many
layers you want in the
atmosphere)
and as for the
oceans I have no idea.
Soundbite version: «Global warming is expected to increase sea surface temperatures, create a thicker
and warmer
ocean surface
layer,
and increase the moisture in the
atmosphere over the
oceans — all conditions that should lead to a general increase in hurricane intensity
and maybe frequency.»
Gravity does the pulling in the
atmosphere and oceans, although, once in motion, viscous shear forces occur between adjacent
layers moving at different velocities.
First, global mean surface temperature depends on the quantity of heat stored at the surface of the earth (earth, lower
atmosphere,
and the mixed
layer of the
oceans).
Lower
Atmosphere is warming,
oceans upper
layers are warming, arctic summer sea ice is disappearing, WAIS
and Greenland are both losing mass annually
and the majority of the earths glaciers are losing mass too.
The surface heat capacity C (j = 0) was set to the equivalent of a global
layer of water 50 m deep (which would be a
layer ~ 70 m thick over the
oceans) plus 70 % of the
atmosphere, the latent heat of vaporization corresponding to a 20 % increase in water vapor per 3 K warming (linearized for current conditions),
and a little land surface; expressed as W * yr per m ^ 2 * K (a convenient unit), I got about 7.093.
(1) The «fast response» component of the climate system, consisting of the
atmosphere coupled to a mixed
layer upper
ocean, has very little natural variability on the decadal
and longer time scale.
Still others cited material explaining various facets of
ocean /
atmosphere / irradiation interactions: direct SW warming of the
oceans, advection of heat below the mixing
layer,
and possible LW warming of the «skin
layer,»
and so forth.
Temperature tends to respond so that, depending on optical properties, LW emission will tend to reduce the vertical differential heating by cooling warmer parts more than cooler parts (for the surface
and atmosphere); also (not significant within the
atmosphere and ocean in general, but significant at the interface betwen the surface
and the air,
and also significant (in part due to the small heat fluxes involved, viscosity in the crust
and somewhat in the mantle (where there are thick boundary
layers with superadiabatic lapse rates)
and thermal conductivity of the core) in parts of the Earth's interior) temperature changes will cause conduction / diffusion of heat that partly balances the differential heating.
Even assuming that the dataset is comprehensive: Considering that the upper -
ocean cooling is seen mainly at 30N
and 30S, another explanation for this cooling is increased
ocean — to —
atmosphere heat transfer in these regions (possibly aided by hurricane - mixing of the upper
ocean layer,
and advection of deeper cold water as a result).
Incidentally, I have been unable to find out if the models which are producing the GW scenarios include some allowance for the fact that the
ocean /
atmosphere interface (the boundary
layer, so called, an irritating nomenclature as the words already have a technical meaning) was changed drastically from about 1850 onwards by surfactant
and oil spill pollution as the petrochemical industry
and petrol engine technologies began to hit their stride.
This suggestion of an accelerated warming in a deep
layer of the
ocean has been suggested mostly on the basis of results from reanalyses of different types (that is, numerical simulations of the
ocean and atmosphere that are forced to fit observations in some manner).
What keeps the hurricane going is the cold upper
atmosphere and the warm sea surface (
and a warm mixed
layer of the upper
ocean will sustain the hurricane)-- just like a Carnot heat engine.
I just don't see how you get from W / M2 to temperature without dealing with the specific heat of the various
layers of the
atmosphere and oceans.
There is such an equilibrium exchange of CO2 between
atmosphere and the surface
layer of the
oceans,
and there is the natural equilibrium that most of vegetation first grows
and then decays
and returns CO2 to the
atmosphere.
Nice misconception you have going there but the real argument is that CO2 can lower the temperature gradient of the cool skin
layer, which slows the heat loss to the
atmosphere and increased levels of greenhouse gases lead to more heat being stored in the
oceans over the long - term.
In any given region, the relative amounts of CO2 contained in the
atmosphere and dissolved in the
ocean's surface
layer determine whether the
ocean - water emits or absorbs gas.
«The turbulent mixing in thin
ocean surface boundary
layers (OSBL), which occupy the upper 100 m or so of the
ocean, control the exchange of heat
and trace gases between the
atmosphere and ocean.»
These are «the microenvironment of marine plankton»
and «the surface boundary
layer of the
ocean (gas exchange
atmosphere -
ocean)».
Since there are several thermodynamic
layers in both the
oceans and atmosphere, there would be more than one oscillation.
The earth's
oceans can be modeled (shudder) as series of masses corresponding to different
layers with energy inputs decreasing with depth,
and with the low mass, low heat capacity
atmosphere on top.
I am not a modeler, but I had been understanding that they modeled the energy transfers between each cell of the models as well as between each
layer of the
atmosphere and ocean.
This is the reason I have mentioned that when you assume all
layers of the
atmosphere and oceans have a fast time constant you miss the possibility that there is some trickle charging happening in the system.
The
ocean surface
layer and the
atmosphere are in close equilibrium in less than 2 years.
Until about 1850, there was some natural variability, as can be seen in coralline sponges (following the changes in the upper
ocean layer)
and ice cores (for the
atmosphere).
The
ocean surface
layer is what directly matters, that contains somewhat more CO2 than the
atmosphere (1,000 GtC vs. 800 GtC), but the chemical reactions in the
ocean water push the equilibrium back, so that ultimately the surface water - air equilibrium is reached with a 1:9 partitioning between water
and air, reverse
and far away from the 50:1.
That was compared to real world observations of quantities
and isotope changes in
atmosphere and the
oceans mixed
layer.
The current total amounts of carbon in the
atmosphere and the
ocean surface
layer are about 1:1.
Henry's Law still holds, as the amount of free CO2 in the water follows the increase in the
atmosphere, but free CO2 is less than 1 % of the total amount of carbon in the
oceans surface
layer, the bulk are bicarbonates
and carbonates, which don't follow Henry's Law, but influence the amount of free CO2.
Ocean surface
layer and atmosphere have rapid exchanges (1 - 2 years) to equilibrium.
New evidence shows that the
ocean also acts as a source of organic matter from biogenic origin -LSB-...] Surface - active organic matter of biogenic origin -LSB-...] enriched in the oceanic surface
layer and transferred to the
atmosphere by bubble - bursting processes, are the most likely candidates to contribute to the observed organic fraction in marine aerosol.
Petra, The global average surface temperature as calculated by the various groups is an indicator of the warming of the system that includes the
oceans, the
atmosphere and the uppermost
layers of ground.
They are measuring everything,
and they see the radiative imbalance
and the TSI
and the
ocean currents
and the entire planetary surface
and the
atmosphere layer temperatures, etc..
«Assessing Impacts of PBL
and Surface
Layer Schemes in Simulating the Surface —
Atmosphere Interactions
and Precipitation over the Tropical
Ocean Using Observations from AMIE / DYNAMO.»
The point is that this observation is not very relevant if the outcome comes from a combination of relevant
and persistently warming data from areas where the temperature is strongly correlated with increase in the heat content of
oceans,
atmosphere and continental topmost
layers,
and almost totally irrelevant data from areas
and seasons where
and when exceptionally great natural variability of surface temperatures makes these temperatures essentially irrelevant for the determination of longterm trends.
Once the CO2 concentration of the upper
ocean is depleted by growth
and sinking of phytoplankton, the timescale for gas exchange with the
atmosphere is about a year for a one - hundred meter
ocean mixed
layer, typical of the tropics.