Simon Edwards (# 6): Yes, there is a certain amount of heat added to the atmosphere &
ocean by the combustion of fossiel fuels as well as other heat sources (e.g. nuclear).
Not exact matches
However, the Clark School researchers say blue whirls could improve remediation -
by -
combustion approaches
by burning the oil layer with increased efficiency, reducing harmful emissions into the atmosphere around it and the
ocean beneath it.
«Due to human activities such as the
combustion of fossil fuels and deforestation, and the increased release of CO2 from the
oceans due to the increase in the Earth's temperature, the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide has increased
by about 35 % since the beginning of the age of industrialization.»
Now, you've got your Apple - lovers (aka: warmists or hysterics) who seek to discern the «signal» of
combustion's consequence in warming a planet between 2 / 3rds & 3 / 4ths covered
by oceans whose mixed layer is some ten times as massive as its air.
For more than two decades, meteorologists and oceanographers have repeatedly warned that runaway global warming, as a consequence of ever - greater
combustion of fossil fuels, could bring about an ice - free polar
ocean by about 2050.
Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution about one - third of the carbon dioxide, CO2, which has been released into the atmosphere from fossil fuel
combustion and land use change has been absorbed
by the
oceans, where it damages coral reefs.
Yet in view of the entirely predictable erosion of sink capacity (
by forest loss &
combustion, soils» desiccation, permafrost melt, and
oceans» warming and acidification) that notion appears to be an outstanding example of optimism bias.
(As this is the result of cummulative emissions (including effects of CO2 uptake
by the
ocean, etc.), and the emission rate has been increasing, such a ratio might be considered a low - ball estimate of what might be considered a «standard» forcing /
combustion ratio.)
As this is the result of cummulative emissions (including effects of CO2 uptake
by the
ocean, etc.), and the emission rate has been increasing, such a ratio might be considered a low - ball estimate of what might be considered a «standard» forcing /
combustion ratio.