Because the 40degree 90degree N region accounts for up to 40 % of the simulated global
ocean heat uptake over one hundred years, the process described here influences the global heat uptake efficiency.
Considering the past half century in this context is convenient because we have direct, albeit imprecise, estimates of
ocean heat uptake over this period.
Not exact matches
... a pronounced strengthening in Pacific trade winds
over the past two decades — unprecedented in observations / reanalysis data and not captured by climate models — is sufficient to account for the cooling of the tropical Pacific and a substantial slowdown in surface warming through increased subsurface
ocean heat uptake.
Abstract:... Here we show that a pronounced strengthening in Pacific trade winds
over the past two decades — unprecedented in observations / reanalysis data and not captured by climate models — is sufficient to account for the cooling of the tropical Pacific and a substantial slowdown in surface warming through increased subsurface
ocean heat uptake.
The key points of the paper are that: i) model simulations with 20th century forcings are able to match the surface air temperature record, ii) they also match the measured changes of
ocean heat content
over the last decade, iii) the implied planetary imbalance (the amount of excess energy the Earth is currently absorbing) which is roughly equal to the
ocean heat uptake, is significant and growing, and iv) this implies both that there is significant
heating «in the pipeline», and that there is an important lag in the climate's full response to changes in the forcing.
Second, energy in vs. energy out of the system can hardly balance until we have a better handle on the circulation of the
ocean (
over 95 % of the
heat capacity of Earth) and its rate of
heat uptake.
Similarly, Matthew England and colleagues reproduced observed temperature trends by providing the model with the pronounced and unprecedented strengthening in Pacific trade winds
over the past two decades — and the winds in turn lead to increased
heat uptake by the
oceans.
«Nevertheless, neither data set supports the model result of Meehl et al. that the
heat uptake in this layer (300 - 700m) in the Pacific dominates
over other
ocean basins during hiatus periods.»
The cycle of extra
heat uptake by the
oceans may be
over for at least a decade.
Along those lines, Watanabe et al. (2013) showed that
ocean heat uptake has become more efficient
over the past decade, which is consistent with the observations of Balmaseda et al. (2013), who found an unprecedented transfer of
heat to the deep
oceans over the past decade, consistent with the modeling in Meehl et al (2013).
Considering all the short - term factors identified by the scientific community that acted to slow the rate of global warming
over the past two decades (volcanoes,
ocean heat uptake, solar decreases, predominance of La Niñas, etc.) it is likely the temperature increase would have accelerated in comparison to the late 20th Century increases.
- that new estimates of aerosol cooling are low - that new estimates of
Ocean heat uptake are low - that therefore observational estimates of climate sensitivity may prove low - that observational estimates are now good enough that they should be preferred
over models - that warming below 2C is net beneficial
Even extending to pre-Argo periods, with a long period the errors in
ocean heat content values have to be very large to have a major effect on the mean rate of
heat uptake over the period.
«In our mor recent global model simulations the
ocean heat -
uptake is slower than previously estimated, the
ocean uptake of carbon is weaker, feedbacks from the land system as temperature rises are stronger, cumulative emissions of greenhouse gases
over the century are higher, and offsetting cooling from aerosol emissions is lower.
The notion that
over the longer timescales, forced responses dominated (at least for the second half of the past century) is reinforced by data on
Ocean Heat Uptake since 1955.
Therefore, subtracting the
ocean heat uptake, the total net anthropogenic forcing
over this period is somewhere between -0.07 and 2.15 W / m2, with a most likely value of 1.1 W / m2.
frankclimate: It is my understanding that the TOA imbalance average
over decade is measured using
ocean heat uptake and is 0.7 W / m2 for the ARGO period.
You write, in reference to it: «his choice of
ocean heat uptake is based on taking a short term trend
over a period in which the observed warming is markedly lower than the longer - term multidecadal value.»
The
ocean heat uptake (OHU) figure that I took, its value
over the last decade, is actually higher than if I had computed the trend
over a longer - term multi-decadal period, and therefore resulted in my sensitivity estimate being higher, not lower.
The slowed surface warming
over the past decade seems to be a result of more
heat accumulation in the
oceans due to short - term increase in
ocean heat uptake efficiency.
So why has
ocean heat uptake become more efficient
over the past decade instead?
Ocean temperature must be measured regularly around the world from the ocean surface to the ocean floor to reduce uncertainty in ocean heat uptake, which accounts for over 90 % of global war
Ocean temperature must be measured regularly around the world from the
ocean surface to the ocean floor to reduce uncertainty in ocean heat uptake, which accounts for over 90 % of global war
ocean surface to the
ocean floor to reduce uncertainty in ocean heat uptake, which accounts for over 90 % of global war
ocean floor to reduce uncertainty in
ocean heat uptake, which accounts for over 90 % of global war
ocean heat uptake, which accounts for
over 90 % of global warming.
If you have good measurements of upper
ocean and atmospheric temperatures, then if you had a good decade - long satellite record of the Earth's total radiative energy balance from space — say, if Triana has been launched to in the late 1990s — then you could use conservation of energy to calculate the rate of
heat uptake by the deep
ocean over the past ten years.
Comparing the trend in global temperature
over the past 100 - 150 years with the change in «radiative forcing» (
heating or cooling power) from carbon dioxide, aerosols and other sources, minus
ocean heat uptake, can now give a good estimate of climate sensitivity.
JK «If I understand correctly your estimate and error for
ocean heat uptake are for average rate
over the period 1880 - 2011, while your estimate of the forcing rate and associated delta T are for 2011.»
If I understand correctly your estimate and error for
ocean heat uptake are for average rate
over the period 1880 - 2011, while your estimate of the forcing rate and associated delta T are for 2011.
Over long time periods, this tropical
heat uptake is roughly balanced by
heat release from the
ocean to the atmosphere in other regions closer to the poles.
Supplementary Information (SI), along with the values I calculate from their 1996 — 2005 GMST data, averaged ERF data for 2000 and
ocean heat uptake data (taking the trend
over 1996 — 2005), and alternatively by accurately digitising ERF ΔF and ΔF − ΔQ values in Marvel et al..
We find that
over a wide range of values of diapycnal diffusivity and Southern
Ocean winds, and with a variety of changes in surface boundary conditions, the spatial patterns of ocean temperature anomaly are nearly always determined as much or more by the existing heat reservoir redistribution than by the nearly passive uptake of temperature due to changes in the surface boundary condit
Ocean winds, and with a variety of changes in surface boundary conditions, the spatial patterns of
ocean temperature anomaly are nearly always determined as much or more by the existing heat reservoir redistribution than by the nearly passive uptake of temperature due to changes in the surface boundary condit
ocean temperature anomaly are nearly always determined as much or more by the existing
heat reservoir redistribution than by the nearly passive
uptake of temperature due to changes in the surface boundary conditions.