I far as i know GODAS providing pentad data and ECCO2 provides 3 - day averages, please let me know where can i get the daily
ocean reanalysis data.
Reconstruction of past decades sea level using thermosteric sea level, tide gauge, satellite altimetry and
ocean reanalysis data.
Not exact matches
Decadal hindcast simulations of Arctic
Ocean sea ice thickness made by a modern dynamic - thermodynamic sea ice model and forced independently by both the ERA - 40 and NCEP / NCAR
reanalysis data sets are compared for the first time.
... a pronounced strengthening in Pacific trade winds over the past two decades — unprecedented in observations /
reanalysis data and not captured by climate models — is sufficient to account for the cooling of the tropical Pacific and a substantial slowdown in surface warming through increased subsurface
ocean heat uptake.
Abstract:... Here we show that a pronounced strengthening in Pacific trade winds over the past two decades — unprecedented in observations /
reanalysis data and not captured by climate models — is sufficient to account for the cooling of the tropical Pacific and a substantial slowdown in surface warming through increased subsurface
ocean heat uptake.
The increase in deep
ocean heat content is also a robust result in
data sets that do not include
reanalysis.
Balmaseda et al. (2013) was a key study on this subject, using
ocean heat content data from the European Centre for Medium - Range Weather Forecasts» Ocean Reanalysis System 4 (OR
ocean heat content
data from the European Centre for Medium - Range Weather Forecasts»
Ocean Reanalysis System 4 (OR
Ocean Reanalysis System 4 (ORAS4).
Landward zonal wind versus temperature difference between land and
ocean during monsoon season [NCEP / NCAR
reanalysis data (35)-RSB-.
According to
data from the
reanalysis produced by the European Centre for Medium - Range Weather Forecasts, the January to October combined land and
ocean global average temperature would place 2014 as third or fourth highest for this dataset, which runs from 1958.
Other
data sources were investigated, including the new Berkeley land -
ocean temperature
data, the MERRA weather model
reanalysis, and satellite radiometer datasets from AIRS and AVHRR.
However, as we recently discussed, the increase in deep
ocean heat content is a robust result in
data sets that do not include
reanalysis.
I've presented videos and gif animations to show the impacts of ENSO on ISCCP Total Cloud Amount
data (with cautions about that dataset), CAMS - OPI precipitation
data, NOAA's Trade Wind Index (5S - 5N, 135W - 180) anomaly
data, RSS MSU TLT anomaly
data, CLS (AVISO) Sea Level anomaly
data, NCEP / DOE
Reanalysis - 2 Surface Downward Shortwave Radiation Flux (dswrfsfc) anomaly
data, Reynolds OI.v2 SST anomaly
data and the NODC's
ocean heat content
data.
Resolution: Horizontal 12 km in the Arctic to < 16 km in North Atlantic, Vertical 28 hybrid layers, 3m top layer Download
Data: marine.copernicus.eu Contact: Laurent Bertino (topaz (at) nersc.no) References: Xie, J., Bertino, L., Counillon, F., Lisæter, K. A., and Sakov, P.: Quality assessment of the TOPAZ4
reanalysis in the Arctic over the period 1991 — 2013,
Ocean Sci., 13, 123 - 144, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-13-123-2017, 2017.
The researchers compared the GNSS - R satellite measurements with
data from other sources, including tropical cyclone best track
data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Centers for Environmental Information; two climate
reanalysis products; and a spaceborne scatterometer, a tool that uses microwave radar to measure winds near the surface of the
ocean.
Metzger et al. (NRL Stennis Space Center), 5.0 (3.4 - 6.0), Modeling The Global
Ocean Forecast System (GOFS) 3.1 was run in forecast mode without data assimilation, initialized with July 1, 2015 ice / ocean analyses, for ten simulations using National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) atmospheric forcing fields from 2005 -
Ocean Forecast System (GOFS) 3.1 was run in forecast mode without
data assimilation, initialized with July 1, 2015 ice /
ocean analyses, for ten simulations using National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) atmospheric forcing fields from 2005 -
ocean analyses, for ten simulations using National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Climate Forecast System
Reanalysis (CFSR) atmospheric forcing fields from 2005 - 2014.
NRL - ocn - ice, 5.2 (4.3 - 6.0), Modeling (ice -
ocean) The Global Ocean Forecast System (GOFS) 3.1 was run in forecast mode without data assimilation, initialized with June 1, 2016 ice / ocean analyses, for ten simulations using National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) atmospheric forcing fields from 2005 -
ocean) The Global
Ocean Forecast System (GOFS) 3.1 was run in forecast mode without data assimilation, initialized with June 1, 2016 ice / ocean analyses, for ten simulations using National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) atmospheric forcing fields from 2005 -
Ocean Forecast System (GOFS) 3.1 was run in forecast mode without
data assimilation, initialized with June 1, 2016 ice /
ocean analyses, for ten simulations using National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) atmospheric forcing fields from 2005 -
ocean analyses, for ten simulations using National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Climate Forecast System
Reanalysis (CFSR) atmospheric forcing fields from 2005 - 2014.
The controversial connection between cosmic rays, solar activity, and cloud cover is investigated using a climatological reconstructed
reanalysis product: the North American Regional Reanalysis which provides high - resolution, low, mid-level, high, and total cloud cover data over a Lambert conformal conic projection permitting land / ocean discr
reanalysis product: the North American Regional
Reanalysis which provides high - resolution, low, mid-level, high, and total cloud cover data over a Lambert conformal conic projection permitting land / ocean discr
Reanalysis which provides high - resolution, low, mid-level, high, and total cloud cover
data over a Lambert conformal conic projection permitting land /
ocean discrimination.
Ryan Maue, if we assume that Kevin Trenbreth has the seminal paper on atmospheric water vapor products in the paper: «Trends and variability in column - integrated atmospheric water vapor», then I have the distinct view that we only have water vapor
data that would pass muster with Trenberth for the period 1988 forward and only over the
oceans in the form of the RSS SSM / I measurements /
reanalysis.
This is captured approximately by at least one recent
ocean heat
reanalysis — despite the shortness of reasonable
data records.
ABSTRACT Sampling uncertainties in the voluntary observing ship (VOS)- based global
ocean — atmosphere flux fields were estimated using the NCEP — NCAR
reanalysis and ECMWF 40 - yr Re-Analysis (ERA - 40) as well as seasonal forecasts without
data assimilation.
As I've noted above, Judith doesn't appear to show any like - for - like comparison which suggests inconsistency between the
reanalysis and observational
data (keeping with the convention of separating the two in these terms despite what I've said above) for recent upper and lower
ocean comparative trends.