As the two scientists see it, the depths of the North and South Atlantic have absorbed more heat in the last 14 years than the rest of the global
ocean system put together.
Not exact matches
PORTLAND, OREGON — Oceanographers have
put a stethoscope on the coursing circulatory
system of the Atlantic
Ocean, and they have found a skittish pulse that's surprisingly strong in the waters east of Greenland — discoveries that should improve climate models.
I remember being shocked when I heard this, given the arguments he
puts forth, the poisons found in all fish, and the imminent collapse of the
ocean systems.
One statement
put about is the AGW to date is around 0.8 C, with another 0.6 C «locked in» as we wait for lags in the
system to catch up — presumably primarily the themal lag as we wait for the
oceans to warm.
But as we get closer to humans dominating the planet, if we're not there already, we need to
put a value on the quality of our energy
systems, the ability to preserve nature, to preserve the
oceans and the rivers.
As Hal Doiron, a NASA thermal engineer, bluntly
puts it: «When I look at the
ocean I see one of the largest heat - sinks in the solar
system.
These are arguably the only
ocean temperature data that exist, which are worth anything; they are based on a very expensive and comprehensive
system that was only
put into place in 2003 — why should these data be «corrected or excluded»?]
The trick is that you can not think of the
ocean and air in isolation because they are not a closed
system, the Sun is
putting in energy to the
ocean all the time and that is ultimately the cause of warming the
ocean.
«Its ten pages of text are filled with gems of junk science, which are summed up in this ridiculous pontification: «Long - term changes in climate will produce more extreme weather events and
put greater stress on critical Earth
systems like
oceans, freshwater, and biodiversity.
Given that, if one wants freedom of choice and an efficient market, shouldn't one accept a market solution (tax / credit or analogous
system based on public costs, applied strategically to minimize paperwork (don't tax residential utility bills — apply upstream instead), applied approximately fairly to both be fair and encourage an efficient market response (don't ignore any significant category,
put all sources of the same emission on equal footing; if cap / trade, allow some exchange between CO2 and CH4, etc, based CO2 (eq); include
ocean acidification, etc.), allowing some approximation to that standard so as to not get very high costs in dealing with small details and also to address the biggest, most - well understood effects and sources first (
put off dealing with the costs and benifits of sulphate aerosols, etc, until later if necessary — but get at high - latitude black carbon right away)?