Sentences with phrase «odd change found»

Not exact matches

A second clue is something you wrote in a comment to me which I found odd (not the comment where you called me a troll — an ugly character — that's totally understandable) I'm talking about when you wrote: «I wouldn't say my «faith» changes.

Examining his subjects with reference to their hypnotic sensibility and to such automatisms as hypnagogic hallucinations, odd impulses, religious dreams about the time of their conversion, etc., he found these relatively much more frequent in the group of converts whose transformation had been «striking,» «striking» transformation being defined as a change which, though not necessarily instantaneous, seems to the subject of it to be distinctly different from a process of growth, however rapid.»

A second clue is something you wrote in a comment to me which I found odd (not the comment where you called me a troll, that's totally understandable) I'm talking about when you wrote: «I wouldn't say my «faith» changes.

I certainly find it very odd to hear them claim that the first - past - the - post voting system «gave us the Iraq war» and then prescribe a change which would have given Tony Blair an even larger majority...

Whilst the may be the fault of the control pad rather than the game, we also found that LB also changes lanes too so it seems odd to keep the move mapped to double down as well.

I find it odd that it takes TD so long to move the money, it seems like the share price could change a bit during that time.

It's odd because I always find that people will ask female artists how their work changes after they have had children, but they never ask male artists!

I find it odd that when the small forcing of CO2 is brought up people say it's a miniscule change, even though the trend is there, but when someone says it's the Sun, even though that is a miniscule change, they see the trend immediately.

Another pointer to a journalist's weblog (that commends this particular Realclimate thread) quoted from Benny Peiser today: ---- Quote It's an odd day when I find myself agreeing with Benny Peiser on a climate change question, but his post Thursday to his CCNet list, in which he blasted media of coverage of the Nature paper on possible changes in the thermohaline circulation, seems on point.

What I find odd is that I have yet to see any discussion of what climate change science might say about the wisdom of continued US «participation» in the Paris «treaty.»

I find it odd that changes in banker regulation, or same - sex partnerships, or assessing childhood education are never based on the «precautionary principle»; that is, any change to a complex system may have unintended negative impacts that far outweigh any benefits.

It is an odd conundrum — in any list of pseudo-science «ideation» or conspiracy theories you find «climate change denial» near the top.

It's an odd day when I find myself agreeing with Benny Peiser on a climate change question, but his post Thursday to his CCNet list, in which he blasted media of coverage of the Nature paper on possible changes in the thermohaline circulation, seems on point.

As to your claim about extremes, I find it odd that you ignore the huge population and land use changes in the Indus over the past decades.

Considering all of the reports that have come out about climate change, the amount of reductions needed, the best means of doing so, and the costs of inaction on every nation's economy and environment I do find it slightly odd that another report has been released on the subject (which says essentially similar things to previous reports), nonetheless the US Climate Action Partnership has just released its Blueprint for Legislative Action.