Voith, V, Ingram, E, Mitsouras, K, Irizarry, K. Comparison
of adoption agency breed identification and DNA breed identification of dogs.
Not exact matches
In the study cited above showing that
adoption agencies frequently misidentify canine
breeds, the authors conclude, «The discrepancies between opinions
of adoption agencies and identification by DNA analysis suggest that it would be worthwhile to reevaluate the reliability
of breed identification as well as the justification
of current public and private policies pertaining to specific dog
breeds.»
Another peer - reviewed study, published by Victoria L. Voith, PhD, DVM, DACVB, and colleagues from the Western University
of Health Sciences, originally compared the
breed identifications assigned by
adoption agencies (shelters and rescue groups) to dogs
of unknown parentage with DNA
breed analysis
of the same dogs.
In 87.5 %
of the adopted dogs in Dr. Voith's study,
breeds were identified by DNA analyses that were not proposed by the
adoption agencies, and in only a quarter
of these dogs was at least one
of the
breeds proposed by the
adoption agencies also detected as a predominant
breed by DNA analysis.
V. Voith, E. Ingram, K Mitsouras, et al, «Comparison
of Adoption Agency Identification and DNA
Breed Identification
of Dogs, Journal
of Applied Animal Welfare Science, July 2009.
In one study, Dr. Voith found that, in 87.5 percent
of adopted dogs,
breeds identified by DNA analyses were not the
breeds stated by the
adoption agencies.
In only a quarter
of these dogs was at least one
of the
breeds proposed by the
adoption agencies also detected as a predominant
breed by DNA analysis.
And after failed attempts to close down «puppy mills» through other legislation, they see this as another opportunity close off the supply
of commercially
bred dogs and send more people to
adoption agencies.
From its inception in 1993, NAIA has championed the rescue
of purebred and mixed
breed dogs and has worked with shelters and animal control
agencies to improve the relationship between rescue groups and these animal welfare organizations and help with fundraising and pet
adoptions.
Creating designer
breeds or low quality purebreds is pretty easy money when you think about the fact that there is very little expense involved since you do not have to pay big bucks or sign an extensive agreement (that
of good breeders would rival any
adoption agency) and there's no money invested in health testing, adhering to a code
of ethics, no
breed club or peers to answer to for any sort
of breeding malpractices and absolutely no consequences for their actions.
Comparison
of adoption agency identification and DNA
breed identification
of dogs, Journal
of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 12, 253 - 262.
Local and
breed - specific
adoption agencies, shelters, and rescue groups have thousands
of good dogs
of every
breed, size, age, and description who are looking for forever homes.
One study, in particular, found that over 90 %
of dogs identified by an
adoption agency did not have the visually identified
breeds as the predominant
breed in their DNA analysis.
In all only 31 %
of the dogs showed any DNA evidence
of the
adoption agencies» named
breeds somewhere in the dogs» ancestry.
A study to be published in the Journal
of Applied Animal Welfare Science points to a substantial discrepancy between visual identifications
of dogs by
adoption agency personnel and the
breeds identified in the same dogs through DNA analysis.