Not exact matches
Earlier this year, a group
of concerned scientists and journal publishers signed an open letter known as the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) to encourage review boards and tenure committees to «eliminate the use
of journal - based metrics, such as Journal Impact Factors, in funding, appointment, and promotion considerations,» and to encourage the development
of alternative metrics (
altmetrics) to measure a scientist's research contributions.
Twenty - five years after the first «scientists» warning to humanity», a new report is continuing to gain momentum and is already the one
of the most talked about papers globally since
Altmetric records began.
ÜberResearch and
Altmetric, leading data and analytics companies serving scientific funders and research organizations, have published an analysis
of Parkinson's disease research papers with the highest
Altmetric Attention Scores in the Journal
of Parkinson's Disease.
Using the same methodology we employed for Parkinson's, our plan is to study other neurological disorders to determine whether there are disease - specific factors which explain any observed differences in the type
of biomedical research most likely to receive a high
Altmetric Attention Score.»
«An in - depth analysis
of a piece
of shit: distribution
of Schistosoma mansoni and hookworm eggs in human stool» generated huge
altmetrics scores when it was published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases earlier this year.
First author on the paper, Dr. Rui Araújo, a neurology resident in the Department
of Neurology in the Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (PT), elaborated, «There seems to be a correlation between
altmetrics and conventional metrics, but notable exceptions occur.
Those most convinced about the importance
of this alternative, online scientific influence — sometimes called the
altmetric impact — have even put together web tools that monitor and measure the buzz a new study generates online.
Altmetric skeptics argue that a big impact online is often a matter
of shrewd marketing rather than quality science, says Mike Thelwall at the University
of Wolverhampton in the UK.
Altmetric Attention Scores are a weighted count
of the volume
of attention a research article has received, intended to reflect the likely visibility and reach
of the publication amongst audiences both within and beyond academia.
Institutional leaders who are serious about understanding how research affects the world should be aware
of publications with high
Altmetric Attention Scores, regardless
of whether they come from discoveries made internally or by competing groups.»
It is possible that they may eventually use
altmetric data to inform their allocation
of grant money.
And some
of the reporting that boosted the
Altmetric score had nothing to do with the study.
«It was completely overwhelming, despite having prepared for weeks for it,» says Brian Nosek, a psychologist at the University
of Virginia in Charlottesville who led a massive replication
of psychological science published in Science in August — No. 5 on
Altmetric's list.
This year's buzziest studies were mentioned a total
of 112,492 times in
Altmetric's online sources.
One
of the most prominent scoring systems is run by an outfit called
Altmetric, now a division
of the London - based publishing technology startup Digital Science.
were mentioned a total
of 112,492 times in
Altmetric's online sources.
Altmetrics are now also available to Affilliates showing a visual breakdown
of an article's digital impact and reach.
Welcome to
Altmetric's «High Five» for October, a discussion
of the top five scientific papers with the highest
Altmetric scores this month.
To account for age we can compare this
Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side
of this one in any source.
Alternative metrics, or
altmetrics, are being rapidly applied in a variety
of contexts for the STEM community.
To account for age we can compare this
Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side
of this one in any source.
Using
Altmetric, we've compiled a list
of the 25 most talked - about climate papers
of 2016.
In the meantime, article - level metrics, increasingly incorporating
altmetrics, are being advocated as a replacement for the inappropriate use
of the JIF.
To account for age we can compare this
Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side
of this one in any source.