The fallacy
of Biblical literalism has been disproven by scientists time and again.
What once would have seemed like an alien Eastern invasion of Christian musical space — a mystical form
of biblical literalism transposed into mesmerizing vibrations — has become an acceptable form of meditation in the Evangelical community.
The final result was the rejection within mainstream culture
of biblical literalism with its repudiation of history, geology, and the scientific method, and an acceptance of the contributions of science, of evolution and Freudian psychology, of a «higher criticism» of the Bible, of the move from an agrarian economy to an industrial economy and its need for high technology, and of a rearrangement of political views to accommodate social planning and reform which became known in the churches as the Social Gospel.
My friend Nathaniel comments that he'd like to see a «Jael With Her Tent Peg,» but I think that's expecting a level
of biblical literalism, to coin a phrase which was already in existence and didn't really need coining... Anyway, you tell me.
His criticism
of biblical literalism drove him back to an acceptance of «biblical realism» (to use his own phrase), to the biblical answer to sin, and the biblical affirmation of God's grace in Christ.
Kind of a stake through the heart
of biblical literalism, isn't it?
Even in educated circles the possibility of more sophisticated theologies of creation is easily obscured by burning straw effigies
of biblical literalism.
Only the naiveté
of biblical literalism would allow anyone to think that.
One of the ironies
of biblical literalism is that it shares so largely in the reductionist and literalist spirit of the age.
In presenting this point of view I am not discussing the untenable position
of biblical literalism which holds that man's nature is corrupted by the sin of a generic ancestor, Adam.
Not exact matches
By abolishing slavery and ordaining women, millions
of Protestants have gone far beyond
biblical literalism.
The early pietists did not engage in critical
biblical study or directly challenge the
literalism of the official teaching.
Biblical literalism requires an understanding
of divine inspiration that denies the humanity
of the authors and defies common sense.
In my experience the reformed traditions (baptists, presbyterian, and many independent churches; the puritans and anabaptists also came from this branch) can tend toward legalism; the pentecostal traditions (Church
of Christ, Assembly
of God, vineyard, many independent churches etc.) can tend toward
biblical literalism and a bit
of a herd mentality; the lutheran tradition can tend toward antinomianism, while the anglican and wesleyan traditions do the best at shooting down the middle (though I am admittedly biased).
What is the alternative to
Biblical literalism as a way
of approaching the Bible?
Not only is this not a faithful approach, but it also means that
Biblical literalism denies the very literal truth
of the Bible which it purports to defend.
Biblical literalism maintains that the whole Bible is the Word
of God because it is divinely inspired.
In the final analysis
Biblical literalism stands in opposition to faith in God and worship
of God, for it replaces these with idolatry
of the Bible.
Biblical literalism denies the centrality
of Jesus the Christ.
Biblical literalism, the Bible as the absolute word
of God, he thought rather ridiculous.
It only has traction if you subscribe to the three tiered universe
of the Middle Ages and fundamental
biblical literalism.
The theological role
of the Bible is controversial in many Quaker circles, especially since Quakerism acts as a last desperate handhold for many Christians who feel abused by
Biblical literalism and fundamentalism.
Literalism diverts attention from, as well as flattening out, the symbolic depth and multidimensionality
of the
biblical texts.
Biblical literalism, in its treatment
of the days
of creation, substitutes a modern arithmetical reading for the original symbolic one.
Of course, McCabe's
biblical literalism made such examples seem weightier than they really were.
Biblical literalism is a powerful force today; it tends to imprison people in attitudes that were suitable enough when science and technology were little dreamt
of but which fail to illuminate a society in which, for instance, it is desirable, because
of the effects
of modern hygiene on death rates, for women to bear, on the average, perhaps a third as many infants as were appropriate two or three thousand or even two hundred years ago, a society in which war might mean something like the end
of the species, or at least vastly closer to that than any war
of the past could be.
Pentacostalism in Black Africa, emphasizing personal faith,
biblical literalism, visions, prophecy, and apocalyptic visions
of extrahistorical justice, may be inspired to send missionaries to the white, affluent, «pagans»
of the North.
The author looks at why we can not simply assert the truth
of the Bible over our modern common sense and shows that
Biblical literalism / inerrancy is an approach to the Scriptures that is unacceptable both to our reason and to our faith.
We must rediscover myth and symbol in reading
biblical texts, and help our people to escape the leaden touch
of literalism.
My third prediction is that the word «evangelical» will go the way
of «fundamentalism» as its adherents become increasingly homogonous and as the word becomes associated with dogmatism regarding politics, science, women's roles, homosexuality, salvation, and
biblical literalism.
On the other hand,
biblical literalism and, to even a larger extent, the authority
of Aristotelian cosmology retarded the acceptance
of the work
of Copernicus and Galileo.
Death Before the Fall:
Biblical Literalism and the Problem
of Animal Suffering by Ronald E. Osborn
Furthermore, there are first - rank theologians and
biblical scholars who, though they have rejected the crude
literalism of a descent
of Christ through the clouds as the mythological product
of a prescientific age, nevertheless use the language
of a second coming to designate the final consummation
of the kingdom.
For more on selective
literalism, but with a fun twist, check out my book, A Year
of Biblical Womanhood.
While insisting that he was not tempted by
biblical literalism, Karl Barth began his dogmatics by describing the liberal tradition
of Friedrich Schleiermacher and Adolf von Harnack as «the plain destruction
of Protestant theology and the Protestant church.»
There is, therefore, no long - range political advantage to be gained by an effort to wrap Israel's security in a blanket
of evangelical
biblical literalism.
Fundamentalism has been characterized by (1) vigorous resistance to developments in the world
of science that appeared to contradict the
Biblical text; (2)
Biblical literalism; (3) individualism; (4) moralism; and (5) insistence on belief in certain «fundamentals» such as the inerrancy
of the Scriptures, the virgin birth
of Jesus Christ, and his second coming.
In either case, it results in a flight from religious pluralism and an insistence on rigidity
of belief, conformity with
biblical literalism, acceptance
of often sterile dogma.
It is still taking interpreters
of biblical literature too long to let go
of literalism.
It was, then, over two decades before he published Origin
of Species that Darwin replaced
biblical literalism with a «more simple and sublime» theology, one in which God is viewed as ordaining that creation operate without interference, through the natural law that he established.
Such a dismissive attitude toward Christian orthodoxy, fueled by a supposed adherence to «
biblical literalism,» is an obstacle to genuine unity in the Body
of Christ.
The
literalism was dictated by their firm conviction as Christians that every word
of the
biblical text was literally inspired by God.
The defense, both actual and fictional, wanted to isolate an ignorant,
biblical literalism as the only kind
of religion that disputes evolution.
«They tend to be less conservative on homosexuality even than European leaders, and less conservative on tithing and
biblical literalism than the rest
of the global south.»
The article, titled, «Social Context and College Completion in the United States: The Role
of Congregational
Biblical Literalism,» will be published in the upcoming edition
of Sociological Perspectives.
Using data from the U.S. Congregational Life Survey, a national sample
of religious congregations and members, Stroope and his team, composed
of two researchers from Hope College and Baylor University, measured the dependent variable
of college completion and the independent variables
of individual
biblical literalism and congregational
biblical literalism.
But there's also bitterness and stridency, as the restless spirit
of «Like a Rolling Stone» stops dead on the
Biblical literalism of «Solid Rock.»
The threat
of natural selection is largely philosophical: It calls
Biblical literalism into doubt and undermines the argument that humans are somehow distinct from the rest
of the animal kingdom.