This podcast covers a controversial subject that has been addressed in Christianity Today, by the Council
of Biblical Manhood and Womanhood and The Gospel Coalition.
UPDATE: For those who think I mean «patriarchy» as an insult rather than a description of reality, consider this: In the current issue of The Journal
of Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, Owen Strachan wrote, «For millennia, followers of God have practiced what used to be called patriarchy and is now called complementarianism.»
I think the case could easily be made that Murrow and Eldredge are actually calling us back to a form
of Biblical manhood because the most common conception of «manhood» in Christianity today is one that borrowed themes and ideas from various forms of «paganism.»
My broad - brush take on Eldredge, et al, is that it's a pendulum swing from one pagan extreme to the other, having missed the point
of biblical manhood entirely.
So this is my idea for a book, A Year
of Biblical Manhood.
Not exact matches
Owen Strachan
of the Council on
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood may characterize this shift in his priorities as a «man fail,» but for us, it's working beautifully.
In short, Jesus fails spectacularly to live up to the ideals
of «
biblical manhood.»
On the Council on
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood Web Site, Wayne Grudem warns that if Christians accept egalitarianism, «we will begin to have whole churches who no longer «tremble» at the Word
of God (Isaiah 66:2), and who no longer live by «every word that comes from the mouth
of God» (Matthew 4:4), but who pick and choose the things they like and the things they don't like in the Bible.»
(I was under the impression that the Council on
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood was considered a mainstream representation
of complementarianism, but perhaps I am mistaken.)
Mary has expressed disappointment that her organization's vision
of biblical womanhood was not presented alongside some of the other complementarian groups I feature in the book, like The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, The Vision Forum, The Danvers Statement, Debi Pearl, Dorothy Patterson, John Piper, Wayne Grudem, the contributors to Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, and
biblical womanhood was not presented alongside some
of the other complementarian groups I feature in the book, like The Council on
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, The Vision Forum, The Danvers Statement, Debi Pearl, Dorothy Patterson, John Piper, Wayne Grudem, the contributors to Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, and
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, The Vision Forum, The Danvers Statement, Debi Pearl, Dorothy Patterson, John Piper, Wayne Grudem, the contributors to Recovering
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, and
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, and others.
Piper is one
of the founders
of the Council on
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood — a flagship organization for the complementarian movement in America — which is now led by Owen Strachan.
And yet I have a feeling that there may be complementarians out there, who, like Micah, do not consider it «foolish» for boys to play with dolls and who are concerned by how these sort
of gender stereotypes are put forth as «
biblical manhood.»
Now, today's example comes from the leader
of the Council on
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, which I (and many others) consider to be a mainstream expression
of complementarian values.
[It should be noted here that complementarian notions
of manhood and womanhood tend to be based on culturally — influenced stereotypes, many
of which project idealized notions
of the post-industrial revolution nuclear family onto
biblical texts rather than taking those texts on their own terms — a topic we've discussed at length in the past and will continued to discuss in the future.]
One
of my biggest concerns about literature coming out
of the contemporary «
biblical manhood and womanhood» movement is that it tends to relegate certain traits to certain genders, and then pit those traits against one another.
Earlier this week, the Council on
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood released the declaration with signatories including President
of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, Russell Moore and Founder
of Focus on the Family, James Dobson.
It is therefore at its best more inclusively
Biblical rather than evangelical only; it is directed indeed to sinful men who need to be reconciled to God but also to men who need in all things to grow up into mature
manhood in the measure
of the stature
of the fullness
of Christ and who are to interpret to others the meaning
of Christian faith.
Owen Strachan is the president
of the Council on
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood.
It was the popularity
of books calling for a return to «
biblical womanhood» that inspired me tofollow all
of the Bible's commandments for women as literally as possible for a year in an effort to highlight the inherent selectivity
of discussions surrounding «
biblical manhood» and «
biblical womanhood.»
Now in the past, I've always made a distinction between the complementarianism
of groups like The Gospel Coalition and the Council on
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood and the hard patriarchy
of groups likeVision Forum and the FIC Movement, assuming that the latter was much more legalistic and patriarchal than the former.
For more information on this position, check out the Web site
of The Council on
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood.
Just last week I was accused
of heresy by Owen Strachan
of the Council on
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, and I often get «farewelled» on Twitter (or «excommunitweeted») for the supposed heresies
of egalitarianism and theistic evolution.
The Council on
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood particularly took aim at the frequent removal
of male pronouns and «man.»
One
of the great needs
of the day is
biblical manhood, and one
of my passions is to build men for Christ and help the church see the beauty
of complementarity.
While labeling the translation changes neither specks nor planks, the Council on
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, based in Louisville, Kentucky, contended that the TNIV contains more than «100 examples
of inaccurately translated verses.»
Most Likely to Inspire Some Facepalm Action: The Council for
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood with «The Bad Girl's Club» [Among the «dangerous» are Ann Hutchinson, Margaret Fox, and (one
of my personal heroes) Julian
of Norwich.
In fact, in Recovering
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood — the manual
of sorts for the complementarian movement — John Piper provides a continuum along which Christian women (and the Christian men who might employ them) can plot the appropriateness
of various occupations along two scales: 1) how much authority the woman has over men, and 2) the degree to which the relationship is personal between the woman and the men with whom she works.
[* JI Packer, for example, wrote in Recovering
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood that «a situation in which a female boss has a male secretary puts a strain on the humanity
of both...» Not all complementarians would agree the hierarchy between men and women extends beyond the home and church.]
For example, in an article that characterizes a man who takes responsibility for the laundry as a «man fail,» Owen Strachan
of the Council on
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood writes:
They are losing ground because their rhetoric consistently reflects a commitment to an idealized glorification
of the pre-feminist nuclear family
of 1950s America rather than a commitment to «
biblical manhood» and «
biblical womanhood» — terms that many
of us recognize as highly selective, reductive, and problematic.
And this bully is teaching the young men at his church and under his influence that bullying is an acceptable expression
of «
biblical manhood.»
«
Biblical Womanhood» has become a hot topic in recent years, particularly in the evangelical community where we've seen the formation
of the Council for
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (and Christians for
Biblical Equality) as well as hundreds
of books and conferences and curriculum on the topic.
(You will notice that these are the passages that appear under «key texts» section
of the Council for
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood Web site.)
The Council on
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood's list
of 14 beliefs, referred to as the Nashville Statement, proclaims that marriage is between one man and one woman and «homosexual immorality» is sinful.
John Piper, co-founder
of The Council on
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, called the Nashville Statement a «Christian manifesto» on human sexuality.
The Bible is not about conveying divine principles for starting and managing a Christian business — but is instead about Christ on the cross triumphing over all principalities and powers and so radically transforming everything we consider to be our business... Scripture then ceases to about teaching about
biblical manhood and womanhood or
biblical motherhood and fatherhood — and becomes instead the story
of how a covenant - making and promise - keeping God took on full human personhood in Jesus Christ in order to reconcile this alienated and wrecked world to the eternally gracious Father.»
This may seem like an unremarkable turn
of events, but according to Grant Castleberry
of the Council on
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (flagship organization for the complementarianism movement, which advocates hierarchal gender roles in the home, church, and society), it represents a severe «cultural capitulation» which, «instead
of helping guide children towards embracing who they actually are, blurs reality,» «confuses them,» and «drags them through the dark labyrinths»
of their parents» gender - based delusions.
All Year: The Bible (There are many translations available at biblegateway.com)- Anchor Bible Commentary Series - The Women's Bible Commentary, Edited by Carol A. Newsom and Sharon H. Ringe - Living Judaism: The Guide to Jewish Belief, Tradition, and Practice by Wayne D. Dosick - Women in Scripture: A Dictionary
of Named and Unnamed Women in the Hebrew Bible, the Apocryphal / Deuterocanonical books, and the New Testament, Edited by Carol Meyers, Toni Cravien, and Ross Shepard Kraemer - Recovering
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, Edited by John Piper and Wayne Grudem - Discovering
Biblical Equality: Complementarity Without Hierarchy, Edited by Ronald W. Pierce, Rebecca Merrill Groothuis and Gordon D. Fee - Women in the World
of the Earliest Christians: Illuminating Ancient Ways
of Life by Lynn Cohick - God's Word to Women by Katharine C. Bushnell - Don't Know Much About the Bible: Everything You Need to Know About the Good Book but Never Learned by Kenneth C. Davis - «On The Dignity and Vocation
of Women» by Pope John Paul II - The Year
of Living Biblically by A.J. Jacobs
By using each letter
of the alphabet a Bible lesson is presented in an understandable and interactive format to teach core truths concerning the Gospel, Godly Character, and
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood.