The resource also includes a knowledge organiser of the complete Beliefs and Teachings
of Christianity which can be used to refer to throughout the lesson when making the revision board games.
He argued that, within this process, there existed an unchangeable essence
of Christianity which, in the course of history, had gone through one metamorphosis after another.
Similarly the decline
of Christianity which began with the early Caliphate in Persia was greatly accelerated with the ruthless persecution of Christians by Tamerlane.
I have known many and they have been truly good people; however, I do not consider them «Christian» as they do not believe the fundamental fact
of Christianity which is reinstated time and time in the Bible — like that of John 1.
If that form
of Christianity which says only Xtians go to heaven was so good why did you leave it.
What was called caesaropapism usually characterized the relations of Church and State in those branches
of Christianity which stemmed from Constantinople.
He foreshadowed the intellectual questioning
of Christianity which has become increasingly strong in the West in the last three centuries.
It is my own belief that the explanation for the enormous sale of Honest to God is simply that great numbers of men and women who wish to be both modern and Christian found in that book a presentation
of Christianity which on the one hand they felt was absolutely honest and which on the other hand (and for the first time) opened to them the basic meaning of what we may style «the religious question»: what man is, what his world is like, how one can find significance and dignity for living, and the like.
And Evangelical, you seemed to be confusing your brand of brainwashed with the rest
of Christianity which has no problem with God and the Bible, and a 4.5 billion year old Earth.
It is the ideology of individualism, the flawed humanism of the Enlightenment, and an interpretation
of Christianity which resolutely avoids addressing the principalities and powers.
He had survived as a heretic and had provided a re-presentation
of Christianity which more and more people began to see to be right.
This is of particular note because of that large faction
of Christianity which seems interested only in whether you and I have accepted Jesus as our «Lord and Savior».
It calls followers of Jesus to revolt against some of the «religious» elements
of Christianity which have nothing to do with the kingdom of God.
Were they, could they be prepared to admit a doctrine which involved the consequence that all the evidences which they had that the apostles preached the truth were delusive, and that all the evidences of the truth
of christianity which had affected their minds and won their hearts were false and deceptive?
There is no version
of Christianity which is completely true.
They understand that the dependence of man upon God and the orientation of man's work by reference to God's work require that theology must take the place of the psychology and sociology which were the proper sciences
of a Christianity which was dependent on the spirit in man.
This demotion was irrespective of the type
of Christianity which prevailed, whether Roman Catholic, Greek Orthodox, or Protestant.
If the indigenous church in each land means anything it means that there are likely to emerge forms and expressions
of Christianity which we would not recognize as such.
Nick Spencer, research director of the Theos think tank and author of The Evolution of the West (SPCK) argues that it is, and that it is a mistake to take the universalist message of the gospel — the good news is for everyone — as invalidation of all identifiers other than being a Christian: «I think that's problematic because it takes the universalist notion of Christianity without also taking the incarnational notion
of Christianity which is local and which does have specific identities.
What I found was that there is some serious immorality and absurdity at the heart
of Christianity which made it impossible for me to believe it any more.
In conclusion to this sketch of Altizer's affirmations we must say a word about his affirmation of the eschatological quality
of Christianity which, he holds, most definitively and radically separates Christianity from «religion» in general, and Eastern mystical religion — the essence of «religion» as such — in particular.
It would be very difficult for anyone to refute these facts, the facts
of Christianity which prove that Mr Limbaugh and his 15 million listeners are no Christians, they are anti-Christian.
All the Pope did was espouse the tenets
of Christianity which says we should care about each other.
islam, like the myth
of christianity which it stole from, is nothing but a fabrication.
A primitivist of an unusual kind, Smith harked back to a form
of Christianity which repudiated the outcome of the Jerusalem conference described in Acts 15.
The Obama Administration will help us christians restore the good morals
of christianity which is good.
Hegel, in those difficult, often cryptic, but nevertheless profoundly rewarding pages in the final sections of The Phenomenology of Spirit, where he discusses Christianity as the «absolute religion,» gives witness to the advent of an absolute form
of Christianity which both negates all previous religion and promises a reconciliation of all those antinomies which have plagued human consciousness throughout its history.
At present this urgently requires a well - argued case for religious freedom; [13] without it Christians will certainly sufferbut society will suffer immeasurably as it loses the spirit
of Christianity which has contributed so essentially to the freedoms and values which have benefited it for so long.
Don, please note that your opinion reflects only one interpretation
of Christianity which appears to be rooted in both the Protestant Reformation and more recently, American - style Evangelicalism.
Not exact matches
While the stories
of each
of the holidays are dissimilar, we still can find a meaningful and common bridge between Judaism and
Christianity — religions
which when their ideals are realized, both speak to the betterment
of mankind and the improvement
of this world we share.
He called it «applied
Christianity,»
which could be used to achieve «a perfected and amazing method
of successful living.»
Even in After Virtue (1981), MacIntyre claims that «the barbarous despotism...
which reigns in Moscow can be taken to be as irrelevant to the question
of the moral substance
of Marxism as the life
of the Borgia Pope was to that
of the moral substance
of Christianity» (a view not likely to be shared by such as Alexandr Solzhenitsyn).
There is a lot
of material available, such as: Positive
Christianity (German: Positives Christentum) was a movement within Nazi Germany
which blended ideas
of racial purity with Christian doctrine.
John Adams said, «The general principles on
which the fathers achieved independence were the general principles
of Christianity.
and that requires completely ignoring the * ongoing * growth
of Christianity,
which is booming in Asia & Africa...
which just happen to be the centers
of global population growth.
Dear Muslims, you regard
Christianity as a harmful pseudo-faith
of people
which have apostatised from the alleged Religion
of Truth, called Islam.
The loudest factions
of Christianity and atheism aren't the largest,
which presents the occasion for mutual understanding: open, honest, introspective and rational discussion between groups
of people who share more in common than not.
To the Christians here calling non-believers fools and throwing the «you're going to hell» trump card around; this is exactly part
of the problem
which has given
Christianity a bad name.
Easter may have its origins as a pagan holiday... but Catholics...
which are a branch
of Christianity, view Easter as the holiest
of days... starting on Good Friday when Jesus was executed to his rebirth on Sunday.
So if Jews are Arabs and Palestinians are Jews Arabs who were there before
Christianity and Islam out
of which few remained Jews and few became Christians and last few became Muslims??
Obviously here is the problem with this nonsensical illogic that is
Christianity,
which a perverted form
of a Jewish heresy tainted by Greco Roman religion and culture.
Christianity is based on a book comprised
of 2nd hand accounts and beyond as well as being translated across multiple languages (some
of which being extinct) to illustrate parables on morality.
From your source, «According to Jewish tradition (later adopted by
Christianity) the Torah was dictated to Moses by God, with the exception
of the last eight verses
of Deuteronomy,
which describe the death and burial
of Moses.»
Read Rodney Stark's «The Rise
of Christianity» to get a realistic view
of the radical changes
Christianity brought about in the Roman Empire... many
of which are * assumed * as rights in modern Western Civilization.
This is the fault
of the Vatican,
which practices Pagan Sun worship, not
Christianity.
I mean, a philosopher or scientist can talk about any
of the things Christians talk bout without using the «wrapper» (transcendence, god, truth, love, etc.),
which begs the question, why talk about these things through
Christianity at all?
Yes, liberal
Christianity is a mix
of Christianity and human secularism,
which is not compatible.
I guess you know that there are a lot
of historical docu - ments beside the Bible
which confirm the truth
of Christianity.
this Trinitarian formulation
of the basics
of the faith is affirmed by ALL the major branches
of Christianity (Catholic, Protestant, Eastern Orthodox)--
which represents the vast majority
of those claiming the name
of Christ.
So is religious faith,
of course, but our nation's original faith had a uniquely Calvinist form — a kind
of radically this - worldly
Christianity which, to echo the historian Carlos Eire, paved the way for modern unbelief.