Sentences with phrase «of creationism»

The ACLU fights every day against the teaching of Creationism in school's for a valid reason.

How about the repeated attempts to for the teaching of creationism in school?

Considering that there are five great religions besides atheism, if you adopt the theory of creationism based on the Bible then should you not be teaching the beliefs of other four religions atleast, leaving aside the beliefs of the atheists?

There, for nearly 20 years, the naturalist sat on the research he'd collected on the HMS Beagle, agonizing over whether to publish his findings and upend a Victorian social system rooted in Christian ideas of creationism and human dominion.

Intelligent design (ID) is a form of creationism promulgated by the Discovery Insti.tute, a politically conservative think tank.

It then adds: «The requirement on every academy and free school to provide a broad and balanced curriculum in any case prevents the teaching of creationism as evidence based theory in any academy or free school.»

if creationism is so great to be taught in the public schools, why should only the christian version of creationism be taught?

Check out apologetics press dot org for rational discussions of creationism vs evolution theory, random chance vs design.

There isn't any evidence of a creationism theory like evolution.

However, this does not imply some of the more ridiculous tenets of creationism (such as man walking with dinosaurs or the world being 6000 years old) should be objectively viewed as truth when all evidence points to evolution as fact.

I don't normally think that dictionary definitions bring much to any argument, but in the case of creationism vs evolution, its shameful that one side can't even be bothered to know the meaning of the word that they're using in highly semantic arguments.

There are many public intellectual debates occurring over scientific and skeptical issues — the place of creationism vs evolution in public science classes, the including of alternative medicine in academic curricula, the validity of debate on global warming, etc..

Depending on which proponent of creationism you speak to they will allow or disavow whatever aspects of evolution suits the needs of their faith.

A large reason for my move to atheism is my occupation within the biological industry, which the fundamentalist view of creationism doesn't hold up.

That is why we have the resurgence of Creationism in the US.

As Katie Infantine explained in her post on Bill Nye's viral video last week, there are multiple types of creationism, distinguished by varying attitudes towards evolution and rival interpretations of Genesis.

He was confident enough in his faith to not see how science could undo what was important in religion even though the Pope at the time tried to twist his ideas into a convoluted «proof» of Creationism which Lemaître resisted.

I hope so Bob, especially teens brought up to believe the garbage of creationism by their parents.

Please note that he is also a vocal critic of creationism.

And yet, the very grounds on which these controversies have been fought — arguing for the «scientific» basis of creationism, making use of the «rational - legal» procedures supplied by the modern court system, and drawing on social scientists for «expert testimony» — all point to the considerable degree to which even religious conservatives have accommodated to the norms of secular rationality.

The documentation of Scopes» case casts a dim view of creationism and the intellectual repression of the era.

New clauses for church academies published on June 9th clarify the meaning of creationism and state that it is a minority view within the Church of England and Catholic church.

It is a reference to Kirk Cameron and Ray Comfort making fools of themselves on national television trying to argue in favour of creationism.

If you take the steps of creationism from Genesis you see that God did not just «poof» and everything sprang forth at once.

Obama made the following comments about the Biblical story of creationism at CNN's Compassion Forum at Messiah College in April 2008.

Religion is not heallthy and should be kept away from the young... lest it infect their minds... with the myth of creationism.

In fact, both Gould and Eldredge are outspoken opponents of Creationism.

How often would you hear Christians standing up and apologising for the influx of creationism in our public school systems?

too disappointing yet typical of creationism.

Then mankind does learn what atoms, the very seeds of all Creationism are!

I agree with Nye, it will take a few centuries, but the craziness of creationism will be turned into the same category as terracentric universe.

I believe there is a great deal of proof of creationism, that does not conflict with evolution, nor vice versa.

The most disingenuous aspect of creationism is that is alleges evidentiary problems with evolution (generally, nothing more than arguments of incredulity based in arguments of ignorance), but then invariably requires invocation of magic to patch up their «legitimate alternative.»

Religion is one lie after another: the lie of original sin, the lie of eternal life, the lie of hell, the lie of answered prayer, the lie that life can have no meaning without religion, the lie that religion is the source of morality, the lie of creationism, the lie of a spy - in - the - sky who hears your every word and reads your every thought.

So, Mr. Rubio, how do you plan on handling the issue of Creationism / Evolution?

We are to brush aside comments in the Bible about controlling the wind, etc, but people are to take the 7 days of creationism literally?

@Theo Are you implying that Stephen Hawking is a supporter of Creationism being taught in Biology classrooms?

Yet, these same people who denounce any notion of creationism will also sooner slit their own throats than investigate their brethren's eye witness accounts of the afterlife.