Sentences with phrase «of debate club»

Anibal is founder and president of Oakland Charter's Break Dance Club, Drama Club (along with two friends) and Skateboard Club as well as being a member of the Debate Club.

Not exact matches

«In the financial industry, there's been a lot of debate, post — financial crisis, around different approaches to risk and gender difference,» says Brenda Trenowden, global head of funds at ANZ Banking Group in London and a member of the steering committee of the 30 % Club, which works to get more women on corporate boards.

Amid the BRIC's ascendancy, there's a growing debate among investment experts as to whether the current club best represents the shifting tides of global power or is more a product of Wall Street hype.

But whether Bitcoin can actually replace gold (let alone traditional government - backed currency) has been a matter of fervent debate — quite literally, as evidenced by an event last week entitled «Gold Versus Bitcoin,» held at a New York comedy club, in which well - known gold proponent (Jim Rickards debated James Altucher, a self - help author now peddling Bitcoin investment advice under the moniker «crypto - genius.»

I have been debating where to start throwing my money, and i have started up a bit with lending club, and vanguard index funds, but most of the hype and youtube videos i see, are people praising divide stocks, and how you can «reinvest that free money back into the stock for more free money!»

In high school at Little Rock Central, she joined the mock trial and debate clubs, and was named secretary of the Arkansas Federation of Teenage Republicans.

Last year, one of the small club of Americans making these beers decided to name and codify it, and thus began the debate.

By a lucky break, a friend who had met him at a debating club found him a post as a proofreader at the London branch of the Oxford University Press — in Amen Court, near St Paul's Cathedral.

Of the twelve members of the Junior Debating Club — the exclusive membership of which was determined by Chesterton and by his friends Bentley and Oldershaw — four were Jewish: the Solomons, Lawrence and Maurice and the D'Avigdors, Digby and WaldOf the twelve members of the Junior Debating Club — the exclusive membership of which was determined by Chesterton and by his friends Bentley and Oldershaw — four were Jewish: the Solomons, Lawrence and Maurice and the D'Avigdors, Digby and Waldof the Junior Debating Club — the exclusive membership of which was determined by Chesterton and by his friends Bentley and Oldershaw — four were Jewish: the Solomons, Lawrence and Maurice and the D'Avigdors, Digby and Waldof which was determined by Chesterton and by his friends Bentley and Oldershaw — four were Jewish: the Solomons, Lawrence and Maurice and the D'Avigdors, Digby and Waldo.

One thesis, offered by more than one writer, rests on the claim that Lewis gave up entirely his interest in reasoned apologetics after a 1948 debate with Elizabeth Anscombe at a meeting of the Oxford Socratic Club.

Well, John Champion summed it up perfectly at the conclusion of the game:» it's debatable if Arsenal still resonate as a big club anymore, what is without debate however is that more recently the often fail to win the big games».

So I expect to see a lot of debate going on about the long term future of the club and our chances of winning any major trophy in the near future after the top Arsenal executive Ivan Gazidis dropped a bombshell about Wenger this week, as reported by Sky Sports.

A club statement released by Sir Chips Keswick said, «We are fully aware of the attention currently focused on the club and understand the debate.

To deflect from his terrible managing he uses this refs debate, and manages to con the section of one eyed fans that all clubs have, but not us fair minded ones who can see right through his deception, and thus keep at least some who sympathise with him.

I even thought top clubs were in for him.Some three or 2 seasons back many here were debating why he should be our main striker.As soon as you mention any other strikers name people would come out with stats and many things defending him.Even Wenger has defended him blindly in the past.People say Wenger's stubborn yeah.But don't we know that there's a reason why everything happens?Honestly speaking he's the reason why Arsene Wenger has failed to sign a top notch striker because he still believes in him.The funny thing is we signed Welbeck at that time who to me did nothing before to be the main man here.People keep saying Welbeck is hardworking and that he works his socks off.But the question is was that our reason for signing him.Welbeck being signed to challenge Giroud tells me a lot about Giroud's quality.Even Walcott (no offence to him) who has zero CF qualities was even chosen over him for a string of games and all in all I think he did well but has too many defeciencies for that role.We've compromised as a club and it'll come back to bite us.

Liverpool also released a club statement to apologise to City, but whether or not the greeting had any bearing on the performance of the visitors is up for debate as they couldn't cope with the Reds early on.

The criteria of «best» is obviously a debate in itself, and many clubs like Tottenham and West Ham will lay claim to some sort of tradition of good football regardless of what's actually out there on the pitch.

We may debate the merits and demerits of that model but the club management is in no doubt as to what business model is best suited for the club.

Indeed in a rational world populated with rational beings, those who believe Mr Wenger is a major cause of what they see as the club's failings, would now debate the issue from the point of view of their final objectives.

If the appointment of former Cardiff City manager Malky Mackay at Wigan Athletic, whilst the Scot is still under an FA investigation over alleged racist, sexist and antisemitic text messages sent to Iain Moody, had brought controversy to the club, new comments from owner Dave Whelan, reported by the Guardian, are set to blow the debate wide open.

But when we hear rumours of players leaving the club, etc. we take it for real and then will start debating on it

We can debate on how great the history is, compare ourselves to Chelsea, talk about how healthy our balance sheet his, how great the fans are (under valued by the club), how Tottenham are «scums», etc etc... All those things do not really matter... Usually it will be to make ourselves feel better and mask the clear lake of options and solutions in our own club.

When people debate Rodgers» legacy at Anfield, his fans will point the 2013/14 season as an incredible achievement — one that, in many ways, would ultimately cost him his job as it was a title challenge that came much earlier than expected; the club were ahead of schedule in terms of building a competitive side, and the emotional turmoil of ultimately losing out on the final day of the season meant there was simply no recovery.

Lots of debating (for want of a better word) going on about Pep and Mour, both good managers in their own way, both have been winners of the top prizes at the top clubs with the top players and neither having built a side on a lower budget which makes them cheque book managers.

Coupled with the lift such a major signing will bring for the entire club, that part of the transfer dealing is surely not up for debate.

According to Sky Sports, there are five Premier League clubs eager to sign the free agent at the end of the season: Aston Villa, Everton, Tottenham Hotspur, West Ham United, and Arsenal are all debating tabling an offer.

This debate follows the successful introduction of safe standing by Celtic Football Club.

It has been yet another season of frustration and disappointment at both club and international level for the Arsenal and England star Alex Oxlade - Chamberlain and there has even been a lot of debate among Arsenal fans about whether he will ever fully deliver on the early potential he showed at Southampton and in flashes as a Gunner.

The identity of our club is up for debate and possibly revision.

I view Sir Keswick statement on the debate of Le Prof leaving Arsenal at the end of this season as a conditional statement to appease the Wenger Out Arsenal fans to be calm as the Arsenal board who for his prudent financial management skill in managing the club finances doesn't want him to go now to try to buy time for him to use Arsenal success of a win of the FA Cup and a 4th place table finish this season as a ploy to convince the Wenger Out Arsenal fans he can still be kept at the club as manager for another 2 — 3 years to achieve the titles they've been craving after in the next 2 — 3 season..

The Arsenal chairman Sir Chips Keswick said: «We are fully aware of the attention currently focused on the club and understand the debate.

The news, speculation and debate surrounding Arsenal and the two star players who will soon be entering the last year of their current contracts has been going on pretty much the whole season and it will go on until they either sign a new deal or transfer away from the club during the summer transfer window.

Should this even be a topic?Giroud is a player of average quality always surrounded by good players.I just don't get.It's as if only Arsenal fans rate him.This was a player who was bought to be the leading striker at Arsenal and after his years of failure which many deny he's now become a super sub?How laughable is that.From failure to super sub.If the so called world class striker we're signing goes out with an injury for about five months who comes in then.It seems to me people lack vision.Why is it always Giroud Giroud Giroud?After so many seasons people are still debating what souldn't even be debatable.I've lost count of the number of times he's been talked about here.This is the problem with our club.It's just not ruthless.This is a player who should have been gone long ago but due to him being French he still gets the chances.We won't miss him when he goes and I'd like to see if he'd stand out in a smaller club.

After a disappointing season across all competitions for Arsenal, the old debate of should Arsene Wenger leave the club has arisen once again.

Whether or not you feel that a protest is necessary for change is a debate that can be held in the comments, because although some will feel it is the only way that fans can make club officials see want what is wanted, others will say that Wenger deserves more respect than to be forced out the club by protest and a lack of support when he is only following Kroenke's orders.

It is a topic of debate that has been raised to Arsene Wenger in a recent media release, of which Wenger was clear to state that he believes the club now has a great balance of youth and experience, instead of before when it was simply all youth.

There have been no shortages of hot takes and instantaneous reactions to these trades, with baseball analysts debating the ability of prospects that won't impact the major league ball club until years down the road.

I am very appreciative of all the obvious efforts Admin puts into this blog facilitating healthy debates and giving an outlet for differing views on our beloved club.

The subject of money is never far from the forefront of debate between Arsenal fans about whether Arsene Wenger and the board are running our great club the right way or if the resistance to the money way of throwing mountains of cash at things is nothing more than an excuse for being tight fisted and making lots of profit.

The price tag was met with much debate as the majority of fans pointed out that whilst the 23 year old has talent that would be a well worthy of investing in, in order to develop at the club, the fee is a bit commanding for his goal scoring record so far.

At the end of the day I don't care what other clubs are doing, we can debate the why and how all day long but don't forget the clubs you are referring to lost some of their best players going into this season, pointless article.

Still life goes on and I hope both sides of the Wenger debate can see the positives this announcement brings to our club.

However, with all the head scratching and debate going on in the English football media this season about the incredible loss of form of the reigning ELP champions Chelsea, and the possible reasons behind it, the words of the Arsenal boss seem to be significant to more than just our club.

There is a big debate on whether Wenger is good or bad for the club which seems to divide a lot of people but I thought all fans were united in understanding that Gadzidis and Kroenke were ruining the club.

Over the past few weeks there have been a couple of debates surrounding the rumours of Szczesny's apparent departure from Arsenal football club.

The arrival of Shkodran Mustafi from Spanish side Valencia in the summer after much debate and speculation was a welcome development to the Arsenal Football Club as the Gunners aimed to tighten the holes at the back.

Of course, there are those within the anti-Wenger camp who have taken to social media in the heat of the moment or after having a few and vented their frustrations without the use of a filter, but surely by this point enough former Wenger supporters have come forward and openly voiced their displeasure with the direction of this club that the debate has moved from the realm of knee - jerk reactionaries to a place where rational thought trumps sheer bravadOf course, there are those within the anti-Wenger camp who have taken to social media in the heat of the moment or after having a few and vented their frustrations without the use of a filter, but surely by this point enough former Wenger supporters have come forward and openly voiced their displeasure with the direction of this club that the debate has moved from the realm of knee - jerk reactionaries to a place where rational thought trumps sheer bravadof the moment or after having a few and vented their frustrations without the use of a filter, but surely by this point enough former Wenger supporters have come forward and openly voiced their displeasure with the direction of this club that the debate has moved from the realm of knee - jerk reactionaries to a place where rational thought trumps sheer bravadof a filter, but surely by this point enough former Wenger supporters have come forward and openly voiced their displeasure with the direction of this club that the debate has moved from the realm of knee - jerk reactionaries to a place where rational thought trumps sheer bravadof this club that the debate has moved from the realm of knee - jerk reactionaries to a place where rational thought trumps sheer bravadof knee - jerk reactionaries to a place where rational thought trumps sheer bravado.

After much debate over the past few weeks since the closure of the domestic season, it was questioned whether Arsenal's Mathieu Flamini would be leaving the club.

This of course threw up quite a debate amongst fans of the club.

Now there is a question which opens a massive debate about how OUR club is run but the answer has got to be yes, I miss Highbury and to say I loved the clock end as a child through to leaving there for the grove as an adult is an understament, although the stadium has been a financial burden obviously it is still a wonderful place to watch football in, but football and especially Arsenal has changed so much in the last thirty years, I really am concerned about how much our supporters are charged either season tickets or match day sales including food / drink, we have removed a vast core of our traditional support and young because of these prices.