Sentences with phrase «of erm»

Analysis and tasks to analyse the mysterious workings of the ERM and the impact of leaving it.

Balls did not recall his experiences of the ERM because he is sentimental and likes to dwell on the past.

Peter Mandelson likes to say that he was instrumental in recruiting Balls, whose appointment was designed to strengthen Brown's operation after he was weakened by his support for British membership of the ERM.

The then 23 - year - old Oxford PPE graduate was one of a handful of people at the FT who were sceptical about British membership of the ERM.

The memories of the ERM gave Balls one final target.

As I blogged in June, Peter Mandelson was instrumental in recruiting Balls amid general agreement that Brown needed to strengthen his operation after he was weakened by his support for British membership of the ERM.

The inadequate use or maintenance of an ERMS is very likely to produce inadequate evidence.

And s. 31.5 CEA, and s. 34.1 (8) OEA, state that NSCs may be used in determining the admissibility of electronic records in accordance with the «systems integrity» concept set out in s. 31.2 (1)(a) CEA, and 34.1 (5), (5.1) OEA, i.e., the integrity of an electronic record depends upon proof of the integrity of ERMS by or in which the electronic record was recorded or stored.

Such review of the state of compliance of ERMS's with the national standards is necessary and should not be left to the trial.

Computers are only one part of ERMS's.

The existing rare case law examples of the kind of examination of an ERMS appropriate to electronic discovery and admissibility of evidence proceedings are: Siemens Canada Limited v. Sapient Canada Inc. 2014 ONSC 2314, [2014] O.J. 1930, at paras. 156 - 57 (OSC - Master, April 23, 2014).

Given the general lack of knowledge of ERMS technology by lawyers and judges, this «standards are not mandatory» comment and footnote 243 show that the drafters have not adequately accommodated the fact that electronic records technology and pre-electronic paper records technology are different technologies.

Therefore there is very likely to be an unacceptably high probability of judgments being based upon inadequate and faulty evidence if the use of ERMS technology to produce records as evidence is not adequately reviewed.

The longer the neglect; the greater the cost, and exponentially so, the greater the size and complexity of the ERMS.

The caselaw shows that lawyers and judges have a very inadequate knowledge of the nature of ERMS technology.

And because such «systems integrity» is a very complex collection of ERMS principles and practices, which collection is too big to put into a definition section in such Evidence Acts, compliance with the following NSC is the necessary test as to the existence of that required «systems integrity»: Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence CAN / CGSB -72.34-2005 (72.34).

To determine the degree of compliance of an ERMS with 72.34, experts in ERMS technology apply 208 tests.

Therefore it is well entrenched in the principles and practices of ERMS experts for whose field 72.34 and 72.11 were created.

John: This should have been dealt with as electronic records management system issue (ERMS issue), i.e., requiring proof of the integrity of the ERMS in which the e-records in question were stored or created.

And throughout the text (346 pages) there are many reference to the relationship between the state of an ERMS system and the requirements and procedures of electronic discovery.

That fundamental dependence of an electronic record upon its ERMS for everything is the «system integrity» concept, i.e., the integrity of an electronic record is dependent upon the integrity of the ERMS wherein it is stored.

For example, the following are ignored by lawyers and judges: (1) the «system integrity concept» of the e-records provisions of the Ontario and Canada Evidence Acts; (2) the National Standards of Canada for e-records management, which are based upon the same concept; and, (3) the fact that the work of experts in e-records management systems (ERMS's) is based on that very same concept, which states: proof of e-records «integrity» requires proof of the integrity of the ERMS in which the records are stored: s. 34.1 (5), (5.1) OEA & s. 31.2 (1) CEA.

Such is also true of their legal departments, as is shown by the absence of ERMS issues in almost all case law and guidelines concerning the use of electronic records as evidence, including the four Sedona Canada Principles texts; see: Why a Legal Opinion is Necessary for Electronic Records Management Systems,» (2012), 9 Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 17 (pdf).

And therefore, given the complexity of ERMS's it has no capacity to judge the adequacy or honesty of production.

The three analogies: (1) whereas a pre-electronic paper record can be symbolized by a piece of paper in a file drawer, an electronic record is like a drop of water in a pool of water, i.e., it is completely dependent upon its ERMS for its existence, accessibility, and «integrity» (as that word is used in the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts; e.g. s. 31.2 (1)(a) CEA); (2) if expert opinion evidence were rendered admissible in the way that electronic records are, there would be no evidence presented, nor cross-examination allowed, as to the qualifications of the expert witnesses, i.e., the «qualifications» of an electronic record being the state of records management of the ERMS in which it is stored; (3) going from a horse - powered transportation system to a motor vehicle - based transportation system has required a vast amount of new laws, regulations, and enforcement personnel, including police officers, judges, and lawyers, i.e., stepping up to a new technology requires that it be controlled by new laws and regulations, otherwise it will cause injury, damage, and injustice.

Its «qualifications» are those of its ERMS.

[6] A party who dishonestly deals with records or any part of the ERMS in which they are stored would not be in compliance with the «system integrity» concept, nor with the national standard.

Electronic discovery can not be made as simple and inexpensive as pre-electronic paper discovery because: (1) the integrity of an e-record is dependent upon the integrity of its ERMS, but the integrity of a pre-electronic paper record is not affected by its records management system; (2) electronic technology has made the making of records much less expensive and time - consuming, therefore ERMSs quickly become voluminous; and, (3) every electronic communication creates a record.

The «system integrity» concept that is in the electronic records provisions in 11 of the 14 Evidence Acts in Canada, [2] dictates that the use of an e-record as evidence requires an assessment of the records management of the ERMS in which it is stored — «records integrity» requires proof of «systems integrity.»

But if it is to make e-discovery and admissibility proceedings adequately respectful of the ERMS technology upon which they are based, it needs the formalization, recognition, and authority of law.

In regard to «best evidence rule» issues, admissibility of an electronically - produced record requires proof of the «systems integrity» of the ERMS in which the electronic record was recorded or stored, as stated in s. 31.2 (1)(a) of the Canada Evidence Act (CEA), or a provincial or territorial Evidence Act in civil proceedings.

Sedona Canada 2d, like its predecessor, shows a lack of understanding of the ERMS technology, i.e., no understanding of the need for standards to ensure the adequacy of electronic discovery, and its connection to proof of «systems integrity,» as is required by the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts.

Therefore to enforce the effectiveness of electronic discovery proceedings, the state of ERMS management must be ascertained.

That requires the application of the national standards of electronic records management by which to judge the state of ERMS management.

Experts in electronic records management apply more than 250 tests to certify the compliance of an ERMS with these standards.

Both fail to recognize that the efficacy and honesty of electronic discovery proceedings depends upon the state of ERMS integrity.

Not exact matches

If a small business uses electronic records management (ERM) software the application will take care of properly purging old information, Larrivee says.

To a large extent, the evolutionary shift reflected the absence of a catalytic crisis such as the radical program of economic reform that occurred in New Zealand following a prolonged period of poor economic outcomes, or in the case of the UK and Sweden, the sudden departure from the ERM.

In recent years, the ERM has been shaken by the «shock» of German reunification, and at times overwhelmed by massive speculative flows of capital.

«There shall, in that time, be rumours of things going astray, erm, and there shall be a great confusion as to where things really are, and nobody will really know where lieth those little things wi — with the sort of raffia work base that has an attachment.

Erm, I love it when Christians claim that no one can comprehend the will of god, then go on and try to foist on others behaviors that supposedly are the will of god.

There shall in that time be rumors of things going astray, erm, and there shall be a great confusion as to where things really are, and nobody will really know where lieth those little things with the sort of raffia - work base, that has an attachment.

Erm, the «word» you read as «evil» is a calligraphy of the phrase «God is All - glorious» rendered in the shape of a ship.

I was hesitant to call these muffins health food because, well, they're no kale salad, but I figured when compared to some of the other, erm, more elaborate recipes on this blog, they might as well be a dang bushel of broccoli.

«Our review indicated that an ERM acquisition of Macquarie Generation is likely to ensure that competition is maintained and may potentially be enhanced in the relevant markets.

«An ERM acquisition of Macquarie Generation has the potential to enhance competition in generation and retailing of electricity,» Mr Sims said.

«The ACCC formed the view that an acquisition of Macquarie Generation by ERM was not likely to substantially reduce the competitiveness of generators or retailers or otherwise raise barriers to entry in the relevant electricity markets.»

Although this weren't Izy's blog, with pretty pictures of strawberries and sugar, I might have thought twice before clicking on a link for «bostock»... (erm, sounds like botox?)

The ACCC has announced it will not opposed this proposed acquisition after forming the view that «an acquisition of Macquarie Generation by ERM was not likely to substantially reduce the competitiveness of generators or retailers or otherwise raise barriers to entry in the relevant electricity markets».

This nicely makes up for the, erm, natural thickening properties of certain ingredients in a non vegan chicken noodle soup.