Applying the Abolition
of Early Parole Act (No Pressing / Substantial Reason Re: Retrospectivity)
Keywords: Charter; Sections 1, 11 (i); Meaning of «Punishment»; Abolition
of Early Parole Act; Retrospective Application; Pressing and Substantial Objective
The Supreme Court ruled against part of Canada's anti-prostitution laws in the Bedford ruling at the close of 2013, and held that a section of the Abolition
of Early Parole Act was unconstitutional.
Today, in the case of Canada (Attorney General) v. Whaling, 2014 SCC 20, the Supreme Court of Canada pushed back against one small element of the government's «tough on crime» agenda, namely, the retroactive abolition
of early parole for offenders already serving their sentences.
The respondents characterized retrospective application of the Abolition
of Early Parole Act as «punishment».
Quoting Whaling, the Ontario Court of Appeal found that the retroactive application of the Abolition
of Early Parole Act conflicted with both Section 11 (h) and (i) of the Charter.
All except Ms. Craddock committed their offences before the Abolition
of Early Parole Act came into effect and were sentenced afterwards.
Offenders who were convicted and sentenced after the enactment of the Abolition
of Early Parole Act are entitled to the previous «accelerated parole review» regime.
Extended incarceration is an «objectively ascertainable effect» of changes to the parole system under the Abolition
of Early Parole Act — crucially, the British Columbia Court of Appeal found that the change occurred between the time of the offences and the time of sentencing.
Significantly, Whaling was a Section 11 (h) case in which the Supreme Court of Canada was asked to consider whether automatically lengthening the incarceration period under Section 10 (1) of the Abolition
of Early Parole Act constituted additional punishment.
The Attorney General failed to establish that ``... retrospective application of the Abolition
of Early Parole Act serves a pressing and substantial government objective, is rationally connected to that objective, minimally impairs the Charter right, and that its salutary benefits outweigh its detrimental effects.»
There is a bill currently making its way through Parliament to address these types of issues entitled Bill C - 56 An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and the Abolition
of Early Parole Act.
Not exact matches
Because there's no federal
parole, Tyler must get the president
of the United States himself to sign off on his
early release through a process known as commutation.
They have been discussing the case
of 62 - year - old Alice Marie Johnson, who has been serving a life sentence without
parole for her role facilitating communications for a cocaine ring in the
early 1990s.
A three - member panel
of the State
Parole Board has turned down a disgraced former city detective's bid for
early release.
Rockland County District Attorney Thomas Zugibe said he plans to fight the
early parole of Clark — who helped plan the heist, participated in the robbery and «reached for her weapon when cornered by police after trying to escape.»
The governor
of New York
earlier this week instructed his state's corrections agency to restrict sex offenders on
parole from using Pokémon Go.
«Today, Governor Cuomo signed an Executive Order setting up a procedure that should result in many tens
of thousands
of New Yorkers who are on
parole having their voting rights restored: one
of Let NY Vote's top 3 priorities, along with
Early Voting (EV) and Automatic Voter Registration (AVR).
Today's statistics show a fall
of nearly half in the number
of prisoners in England and Wales granted
parole -
of the 901 who applied only 106 were released
early.
Sweeney's attack took place just weeks after coming out
of his
parole period for an
earlier child sex offence.
In a landmark study performed by the National Academy
of Sciences,
parole board judges were most likely to give a favorable ruling
early in the morning.
So when a policewoman (Sidne Anderson) shows up and asks him to come down to the station and reveals that his parent's killer is getting out
of prison
early on
parole, his recluse desperation clicks with us as fresh - born necessity clicks on for him.
A year
earlier, he had been so certain
of his religious conversion that when he went before the Illinois
parole board, he let his inner peace sell itself.
When he was sentenced, accelerated
parole provisions
of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act allowed for
early parole after serving one - sixth
of the sentence.
However, in R. v. Summers 2014 SCC 26 (April 11, 2014), the Court corrected such untruthful use
of «untruth» in legislation by approving the use
of such enhanced credit because
of lost opportunity for
early release and
parole due to time spent in PSC not being taken into account.
When Parliament killed
early parole provisions in 2011 and applied the abolishment retrospectively, it violated the rights
of those who were sentenced before the repeal took effect, the Supreme Court
of Canada has found.
The appellants sought
early release and had been denied an oral hearing by the
Parole Board under the operation
of the statutory regime (detailed in paras 3 - 17).
Mack, 38, was sentenced to life in prison with no chance
of parole for 25 years on Feb. 22, 2008, after a jury
earlier found him guilty
of first - degree murder for the 2002 slaying
of fellow DJ Robert Levoir, 25.
The narrow issue before the Supreme Court was the meaning
of the term «circumstances» and whether the lost opportunity for
early release and
parole in pre-sentence detention can be such a circumstance, capable
of justifying enhanced credit at a rate
of 1.5:1
The study found that prisoners who appeared
early in the morning were granted
parole around 70 per cent
of the time, while those who appeared in the afternoon were granted
parole less than 10 per cent
of the time.