A Nasty Problem
of Early Writers... I hear this all the time.
The Epistle of James is a book that has been held by some to be not a Christian book at all, but a Jewish tract modified at one or two points to make it appear Christian.66 By another it is said to come closer to the Synoptic gospels in its type of thought than any other
of the early writers.
The attempts
of the early writers on the life of Jesus to unearth plain facts, and to reassure Christians that the facts were not really miraculous, went nowhere.
Reviewing the exegetical search
of the early writers involves, then, for those of us who have come into the inheritance of these traditions, the responsibility not only to interact with these inherited traditions, but also to interpret these in the context of the «extratextual hermeneutics that is slowly emerging as a distinctive Asian contribution to theological methodology [which] seeks to transcend the textual, historical, and religious boundaries of Christian tradition and cultivate a deeper contact with the mysterious ways in which people of all religious persuasions have defined and appropriated humanity and divinity.»
In fact, Mary Shelley is considered one
of the earliest writers of science fiction.
The Greek philosopher Parmenides, one
of the earliest writers in the history of philosophy, considered being and becoming.
He was one
of the earliest writers to highlight and report on a number of companies that have since become «unicorns» (reaching a valuation of $ 1B or more), including Zenefits and Twilio.
striking similarities with the accounts
of earlier writers, allowing for what he regarded as an acceptable level of adaptation to changed circumstances;
Not exact matches
Same comfort for a lot less money,» says Hester, a
writer at Our Next Life
early retirement blog, and veteran
of «100 + flights a year and 80 + hotel nights.»
Though Trump campaign spokesperson Jason Miller released a statement
early Tuesday morning praising Melania Trump's address as «beautiful,» and noting that her «team
of writers took notes on her life's inspirations, and in some instances included fragments that reflected her own thinking.»
For some time, hyper - modern
writers have brought to bear against their modern past the same sort
of scarifying analysis that
earlier modern
writers brought against the premodern past.
The comedian,
writer, actor, movie director, and lover
of jorts and hockey jerseys shared a very lighthearted and optimistic post on Twitter
early this morning, offering a hospital selfie and writing, «After the first show this evening, I had a massive heart attack.
With that preparation, Professor Richard propounded the first question, the one Percy had to contend with from his
early recognition as novelist to the end: «Do you consider yourself as a Southern
writer and, if so, what features
of your work do you regard as peculiarly Southern?»
c) you seem unaware that Paul is one
of (if not THE)
earliest writer in the NT (and most scholars presume the
earliest source is the best source)
Earlier this year the Fox network, showing either the effects
of the
writers» strike or the signs
of social decay, offered a gem
of televised exploitation — the kind that repulses you but you can't help watching.
To appreciate the significance
of Calvin's work ethic, it is necessary to understand the intense distaste with which the
early Christian tradition, illustrated by the monastic
writers, regarded work.
In her
early adulthood, Angelou moved to New York and became a member
of the Harlem
Writers Guild.
The
writer who goes under this name has left us some
of the most magnificent poetry in the Bible — poetry which is largely free from the archaic obscurity
of some
of the
earlier prophets, and can be enjoyed for the power and range
of its imagery and its richly embroidered language, as well as for the sublimity
of its thought, which touches, probably, the highest level reached anywhere in the Old Testament.
When referring to the
earliest followers
of Jesus, the Gospel
writers often speak
of two groups
of disciples: the Twelve and the Women.
You will observe that not one
of the books
of the Old Testament (in its finished form) is
of earlier date than the eighth century BC Before that time there existed traditions handed down by word
of mouth, and various documentary records and compositions, which were used by later
writers.
All the historically significant spiritual
writers who advocate frequent communion — one only has to think
of the great St Francis de Sales in the late 16th and
early 17th century — also stress the necessity for frequent confession and serious preparation.
Although the various scriptural arguments for the resurrection
of Jesus are open to question, modern
writers insist that some explanation is needed
of what empowered the
early disciples to spread the message
of Jesus across the world.
What the
early Christian believers and
writers, for example Mark, tried to do was apply to him the highest conceivable categories, human and divine; but in the end these all proved inadequate, as the later church soon discovered; for Jesus means more, was more, and is more than any
of these categories could convey.
Centuries
earlier the psalmist and later the
writer of II Peter wrote, «Do not be ignorant
of this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years and a thousand years is as one day» (3:8).
The
earliest of the three (St. Mark) is clearly the work
of a
writer almost obsessed by the apologetic necessity
of somehow making intelligible to his readers the scandalous outcome in rejection and death
of the ministry
of one whom he clearly believed to be the expected Messiah.
Early Christian
writers mention an Elder John
of Ephesus, who was a follower
of Jesus but was not the apostle
of that name, and they sometimes refer to him simply as «the Elder», just as the
writer of these letters calls himself.
In the course
of a wide reading
of Puritan and other Protestant
writers in the sixteenth and
early seventeenth centuries, I have found nothing but opposition to this type
of ascetic «perfection».6
Early Christian
writers speak
of two groups
of Jewish Christians, the Nazarenes and the Ebionites.
All in all this is a remarkable and valuable book, not only for the illustrations it offers
of ancient rites, but also for the accurate accounts it offers
of the way in which baptism was addressed by
early Christian
writers from the New Testament to the fourth century, making great use
of Cyril
of Jerusalem and John Chrysostom in the east and Ambrose and Augustine in the west.
It isn't found in any that date back later than the 8th century in fact and is not referenced by any
of the
early church
writers before the 13th century.
So far as the interpretation
of the saying is concerned, there is general agreement that the «not with observation» denies the possibility
of the usual kind
of apocalyptic speculation, and the present
writer claimed
earlier, (N. Perrin, Kingdom, pp. 176 ff.)
Earlier writers (as well as the rest
of the New Testament) do not refer to a special birth.
In an
earlier essay, Hill quotes a
writer familiar to readers
of First Things, Eve Tushnet, who also embraces a gay identity.
Perhaps some notes
of Paul's were incorporated, somewhat as the Gospel
writers drew on
earlier sources, but it is practically certain that these letters in their finished form stand at or near the end
of the New Testament writings.
Although the
early Christian
writers had the Old Testament as their Scriptures, not one
of them had any idea that he was writing something that would itself become Holy Writ.
The message
of the four Gospels is consistent with the writings
of the Apostle Paul, who was the
earliest New Testament
writer, and the message
of the Gospel is consistent with the teachings
of the
early church.
Earlier this month, a website called Veterans News Now (VNN), removed James M. Wall from its editorial board, where he was listed as «associate editor,» and moved his name to a list
of the site's «frequently featured
writers.»
The general position
of these
writers, whose contributions vary considerably in approach and quality, is that Jesus made no claim
of divinity for himself and that the doctrine
of the incarnation was developed during the
early centuries
of the Christian era as an attempt to express the uniqueness
of Jesus in the mythological language and thought forms
of the Greek culture
of the time.While recognizing the validity
of the patristic theologians» work, which culminated in the classical christological definitions
of Nicea and Chalcedon, the British theologians question whether these definitions are intelligible in the 20th century, and go on to suggest that some concept other than incarnation might better express the divine significance
of Jesus today.
That Gospel was by far was the most widely used
early Christian book, to judge by the number
of copies that have surfaced in the dry sands
of Egypt, or by the number
of quotations in
early Christian
writers, or by the number
of textual corruptions introduced from Matthew into other Gospels by scribal copyists obviously more familiar with Matthew.
The Addai traditions were as persistent in the
early church
of Mesopotamia as the Thomas traditions were in India By the end
of the fourth century Addai was commonly accepted by Syrian
writers both Eastern and Western as the founder
of their church.
The criterion for the
early theology was taken by
writers such as Ibn Khaldun and Adud al - Din al - Iji to be the teachings
of the
early Muslims and the orthodox party.
From pagan
writers of the
early second century A.D. it can be gleaned that Christianity had spread from Judaea to Rome, possibly before A.D. 50, (Suetonius, in his Life
of Clandius, says that Claudius expelled the Jews from Rome for continual rioting «at the instigation
of Chrestus», a phrase which has been variously interpreted, but may refer to trouble between Jews and Christians.)
It has always been an insoluble problem for harmonists and
writers of the life
of Christ; and it is clear from the way Matthew — and perhaps John — and even Luke used the materials
of the Gospel
of Mark that they, who were its
earliest editors and commentators, did not view the Marcan order as chronological or final and unalterable — save in one section, the passion narrative, though even here they did not hesitate to make some changes in order.
At an
early stage
of the struggle, two Roman
writers have left a record
of the way in which they looked at the «Christian question»
of their time.
«St Paul, a very
early Christian
writer and the most influential saint
of Christianity, wrote in 1 Thessalonians 2:14 - 16»... the Jews, who killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and persecuted us.
In his
earlier writing, Pinnock's Biblically derived qualifications concerning inerrancy were based on the facts that modern historiography was unknown in Biblical times, that
writers use the language
of simple observation (e. g., the sunrise), that figurative and mythological language is used (Isa.
Experts point out that the King James is based on at least two
earlier major English translations, so its creators were editors as much as originators
of these phrases, but it is the King James Bible that the great English
writers knew, Goff said.
These accounts were easier to spot
earlier in the year, because the X-rated semi-literacy
of the
writers was often unintentionally hilarious.
In the Middle Ages, the slogan was adduced in order to acknowledge that one may speak
of a consensus among
early Christian
writers (consensus patrum) even if these authors displayed some differences in their interpretations
of the Scriptures.
One often finds that the Fathers
of the
early years
of the Church are more direct and better at this than modern
writers.