Does it even make any senset to mix
of FOK and market / limit order, or are they mutually exclusive or incompatible?
I agree there are holes in the science
of FOK, but this article (with it's shoddy resources to back up it's claims) & it's commenters just proves how backward minded 99 % of the population is.
Yesterday, I made a large batch
of an FOK recipe — Spinach - Potato Tacos (http://www.forksoverknives.com/recipes/spinach-potato-tacos/).
Some of these foks need to clue into the real world.
Not exact matches
Hi there, not sure if you're aware
of this, but
FOK just posted a nearly identical recipe as one
of their featured Thanksgiving recipes, with much
of your instructions and description copied word for word.
I've talked to a bunch
of people who have it, including random
foks at airports, slackers at EB, etc..
With a
FOK limit order not at the BBO you are shooting in the dark for a quick match, most
of the time it does not fill.
In case
of limit order, by definition it need not be immediate, so a
FOK limit order is incosistent (unless the quoted limit price is exactly euqual or better than the current price).
Tonight The Nines, in Peckham plays host to the launch
of The Performance Studio's Autumn / Winter Season with Performances From Parisian artist Arianne
Foks and London based artist John Costi.
Delivered in 8 sessions over 2 months,
FOK was evaluated in a randomized, longitudinal trial in which the study cohort was followed for 48 months after intervention.12 A significant intervention impact was noted on rates
of protected sexual intercourse 6 months after intervention, although by 12 months this effect was no longer apparent.
At 12 months, after controlling for baseline, when comparing perceptions
of monitoring and communication between
FOK plus ImPACT (only) and
FOK plus ImPACT plus boosters, perceptions
of parental monitoring and open communication did not differ by intervention status.
The possible effects
of a booster in addition to a «basic» program were explored in the original evaluation
of Focus on Kids (
FOK), 1 such small group, face - to - face HIV adolescent risk - reduction intervention.
To determine whether the addition
of a parental monitoring intervention (Informed Parents and Children Together [ImPACT]-RRB- alone or with «boosters» could enhance (either broaden or sustain or both) the effect
of a small group, face - to - face adolescent risk reduction intervention Focus on Kids (
FOK).
Although perceptions between both groups declined after baseline, perceptions
of parental monitoring after controlling for baseline were significantly higher among youths who were exposed to
FOK plus ImPACT compared with those who received
FOK only at 6 months (P =.008).
At 12 months after intervention, again controlling for baseline differences, rates
of alcohol and marijuana use were significantly lower and cigarette use and overall risk intention were marginally lower among
FOK plus ImPACT youths compared with
FOK only youths.
In summary, all youths (817) received
FOK; approximately two thirds (496)
of the youths with their parent (s) received ImPACT; and the others (321) received a parental attention control and, 6 months later, approximately one third
of the youths (one half
of those who received ImPACT) received a booster (as they did again at 10 months).
FOK is an HIV risk reduction intervention that consists
of 8 sessions and emphasizes decision making, goal setting, communication, negotiating, and consensual relationships and information regarding abstinence and safe sex, drugs, alcohol, and drug selling.
Each
of the 3 intervention components (
FOK, ImPACT, and boosters) has been described in detail previously, 6,13,17 and therefore we only briefly summarize them here.
At 6 months» follow - up, youths in families that were assigned to
FOK plus ImPACT reported significantly lower rates
of sexual intercourse, sex without a condom, alcohol use, and cigarette use and marginally lower rates
of «risky sexual behavior» compared with youths in families that were assigned to
FOK only.
After completion
of baseline measures, youths were randomized to receive a face - to - face intervention alone (
FOK only), a face - to - face intervention and a parental monitoring intervention (
FOK plus ImPACT), or both
of the above plus boosters (
FOK plus ImPACT plus boosters).