Sentences with phrase «of god or god»

those of whom can not prove the existence of god or any god type creature believes purely on the idea of its existence... the notion of what the idea stands for is great — a supreme being with infinite knowledge and power who is behind it (life) all... truly a fantastic idea indeed....

No Mugs, it is the lack of belief in the existence of a god or god.

An atheist denies completely the chance of a god or god (s), she obviously didn't deny that because now she's a Catholic.

Back to Devoted's question — In the post Devoted asks... «So I want to know that when Jesus is said to be the son of God or God himself what is the source of this in Bible?»

You have no proof of your god or any god, which is why some people have become atheists.

It is easy to see that this sort of self - denial does not lay hold of God or the God - relationship, but remains on the worldly plane of a relationship between men.

Thus, Islam and Christianity are absolutely contrary: The core tenet of Christianity (believing that Jesus is the Son of God or God himself) is the greatest sin in Islam.

As soon as you confess that Jesus Christ is the eternal Son of God or God himself, every Muslims thinks you are an infidel.

We can ascribe claims of his perfection to a desire to make the point that he was «the one», whether «the one» was identified as the Son of God or God the Son, as Savior or the Lamb.

Nowhere in Jewish teaching does it say that the Messiah will be a son of God or a God.

The challenge of pastoral care is recognizing that our love is not the equivalent of God or God's love, but rather a reflection of it.

Surely he would as well come to explain that he was no Son of God or God and lead his people to the true path... guess he will kill those rejecting his directions of belief...

The truth is that Jesus was the Son of God or God himself.

Dear Muslim, you are still invited to acknowledge Jesus Christ as the eternal Son of God or God himself, and to get delivered by him from all your sinfulness.

Atheism is just a position on a proposition of the existence of a god or gods.

= > Correct, but Einstein's and Spinoza's beliefs do not change the nature of God or Gods purpose for creation any more than yours or the Pope's does.

Therefor the two are not mutually exclusive: agnostic atheist means «to not have knowledge of a god or gods, and to not have a belief in a god or gods».

The common denominator of athiests, according to the definition, is «disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.»

There have been Atheist throughout history and I highly doubt that it was not until two generations ago that someone put forth the argument that there is no God, or do you think that doubt of a God or Gods, is a totally new concept?

Atheist means, «a person who disbelieves or lacks belief in the existence of God or gods.»

Atheist: One who DISbelieves in the existence of a god or gods.

I find no reason to believe in any god or gods, therefore I seriously doubt the existence of any god or gods.

There is no evidence for the existence of a god or gods.

I don't have a belief on the situation one way or the other, my grounding in the question of any God or gods comes from the lack of evidence for or against.

I am agnostic with respect to having clear or certain knowledge about the existence or non-existence of a god or gods but reject the unsubstantiated claims of theists.

There are countless questions that arise when you propose the existence of a god or gods.

The existance of a god or gods was really moot.

No one in the history of the planet has come forth with any evidence to support the claim that any type of a god or gods exist.

From the Enlightenment onward the idea of god or gods has been entirely discredited.

The idea of god or gods is a leftover from the Paleolithic Era.

First, sacred literatures are, as a usual rule, regarded as in some sense the word of God or the gods, revealed to man.

Jews and pagans generally taught that the manifestation of God or the gods to humans usually took place in a mediated or disguised mode (through burning bushes or nocturnal visitors, for example).

That said, there have been strains of eastern thought which at the very least down - played the role of god or gods, eg confucianism and even buddhism.

@Alex Most atheists here have openly stated that the existence of a god or gods is logically possible, but the total lack of empirical evidence for any god, let alone the very specific gods of torah, bible, koran, etc, is more than a little suspi - cious.

This does not rule out the existence of a god or gods, of course, but certainly offers no proof of their existence either.

Generally atheists do not outright, 100 % deny the existence of a god or gods (although some do).

Religion is an organized system of supernatural beliefs — particularly in some sort of god or gods, atheism is — precisely NOT that!

There is NO evidence for the existence of a god or gods (that's where faith comes in), and so it is not reasonable to believe in one.

Not believing in the existance of god or gods is not the same thing as atheism.

Tarring a group of people who have not been given proof of the existence of a God or Gods (depending on your chosen «Faith») or of the ability of prayer to alter anything is not terribly helpful.

So... If, according to your own quote, there is currently NO PROOF of any god or gods, then why do YOU believe in god and how can you claim that I am a victim of faulty logic for NOT believing in god?

There is no evidence for the existence of any god or gods.

Any argument for or against the existence of a god or gods is pure and simple fallacy.

«Theism» = a belief in the existence of God or gods.

Therefore «Atheism» means, literally, «without a belief in the existence of God or gods.»

from google: the · ism / ˈTHēizəm / Noun: Belief in the existence of a god or gods, esp.

Because to be a theist — one who believes in the existence of God or gods one can not at the same time be agnostic and say it is impossible to know if there is a God.

There are, of course, proper names of God or gods, whether in the polytheistic religions or, as in ancient Israel, where the one omnipotent God, Yahweh, bears a special name because the people is convinced to have had a special experience of him in its history, which characterizes him despite his incomprehensibility and actual namelessness and thus confers a name on him.

The movement of our love toward all these things, though they go by the name of God or gods, is the way of our idolatry; it is the movement toward the many away from the One, toward the partial instead of the universal, toward the work of our hands rather than toward our Maker.

There is some quantum of evidence that would convince me of the existence of god or gods, although it would have to be a lot, I would always suspect that there was an advanced civilization behind the evidence.