Sentences with phrase «of hawking»

Which confounds the genius of Hawking?

Whenever I feel like I've got a better head on my shoulders than most, I can always try to get through one of Hawking's academic papers to remind myself that, no, I do not.

And while you're there, you can check out some of Hawking's work in other great series», such as Stephen Hawking's Universe and Genius by Stephen Hawking.

I thought I might «sing» at you instead of hawking wares, sing songs on the theme of hard economic times, because for all of our great wealth, indeed luxury, there are still... [more]

Then, this past Monday, spurred on by an New York Times investigation into health supplements, the New York State attorney general's office accused four national chains of hawking supposedly healthy dietary supplements under their store brands that ranged from useless to fraudulent to possibly harmful.

The success of Hawking's book does not disprove that view.

Unless you've got a few million years to wait around for your Pokemon to be spat back out, particle by particle, in the form of Hawking Radiation.

Mark Stevens is the king of hawking, and he enjoys this type of venue.

But «Theory» wouldn't have you know much of Hawking's professional life, stout atheism, or general rambunctiousness.

Redmayne plays young Stephen Hawking in the magnificent James Marsh's dramatization of Hawking's relationship with his first wife, Jane (Felicity Jones).

What You Need To Know: Arguably the most famous scientist in the world, Stephen Hawking's story has been brought to the screen before (Benedict Cumberbatch played him in a television film a decade ago), but «The Theory Of Everything» marks the first time the story's made it to the big screen, and has some hefty names behind it: an adaptation of Hawking's ex-wife Jane's memoirs «Travelling To Infinity,» it's backed by «Atonement» producers Working Title and is helmed by Oscar - winning «Man On Wire» and «Shadow Dancer» helmer James Marsh.

Marsh neither understates the privations and terror of Hawking's illness, nor overstates the potential for inspirational uplift in his survival.

The Theory of Everything Eddie Redmayne's uncanny performance as Stephen Hawking highlights this well - directed biopic, which juggles the stories of Hawking's discoveries, his illness, his amazing survival and his loving but turbulent marriage.

The role of Hawking is played to perfection by surefire Academy Award nominee Eddie Redmayne, while the role of his loving and supportive wife Jane is portrayed by almost certain fellow Oscar -LSB-...]

Director James Marsh and screenwriter Anthony McCarten never romanticize Jane's role as a caregiver for her husband, but pay respect to the grandiose triumphs (and typical disappointments) of their marriage using the literally awesome subject matter of Hawking's theories as an analogy.

Jones will play the wife of Hawking, who is set to be portrayed by Redmayne.

If they were able to get back to you with lightning quickness every time, you might begin to worry if they ever do anything outside of hawking their online dating profiles.

There is a lot of hawking in an attempt to expel the mucus.

Physicists believe that information about the contents of a black hole radiates out from its surface in the form of Hawking radiation.

Some black - hole researchers got into the field because of Hawking himself.

Explaining the rationale of the BBC program of Hawking, BBC director - general Tony Hall said science has been changing the world at an extraordinary pace and the audience must know the new developments.

Professor Roessler (who has a medical degree and was formerly a chaos theorist in Tuebingen) also raised doubts on the existence of Hawking radiation.

But, sadly, Stephen Hawking for Beginners by McEvoy and Oscar Zarate (Icon Books, pp 176, # 7.99 pbk) suffers because it seems to have been put together in a rush — perhaps to hit the bookshops alongside the paperback of Hawking's own A Brief History of Time.

There is also a dose of Hawking humor.

That might produce more conclusive evidence of Hawking's theory.

One of Hawking's major discoveries, made in 1973, was that quantum effects will cause black holes to emit particles.

Quantum theory predicts that one particle might be dragged in before the pair has a chance to annihilate, and the other might escape in the form of Hawking radiation.

He became a graduate student of Hawking's in the 1970s, was one of the first scientists to investigate small black holes and today is professor at Queen Mary, University of London.

At first glance, this seems like a serious concern, especially given that some details of Hawking's original argument may be incorrect — specifically the claim that information is destroyed in black holes.

By taking the change in the black hole's spin, and her half of the Hawking radiation that is emitted after she drops the qubit, Alice can use the rules of quantum teleportation to work out the spin of the qubit she dropped into the black hole — and hence retrieve information from beyond the black hole's event horizon.

Ulf Leonhardt of the University of St. Andrews in Scotland, whose group in 2008 proposed the optical method of producing event horizons that Faccio and his colleagues used, says that the new research indeed represents the first observation of Hawking radiation.

Those that form astride this sonic event horizon become the equivalent of Hawking radiation.

Since the discovery of Hawking radiation, physicists have thought that radiation would be emitted randomly, thus destroying any information encoded in anything that had fallen into the black hole — which, perplexingly, would violate a basic tenant of quantum mechanics.

Every time a black hole «releases» a particle of Hawking radiation, it should decrease in mass.

More details are expected later today when one of Hawking's collaborators Malcom Perry expands on the idea, and Hawking and his colleagues say they will publish a paper on the work next month, but it's clear he is gunning for the idea that black holes are inescapable.

In the 1970s Hawking introduced the concept of Hawking radiation — photons emitted by black holes due to quantum fluctuations.

As the proposal goes, particles of Hawking radiation are linked to each other so that over time an observer could measure the radiation and piece together what's inside the black hole.

After the work of Hawking and Penrose, the beginning was clarified: The Big Bang was a space - time singularity out of which space, time, matter, and energy came to be.

Applying this to event horizons, they say that individual particles of Hawking radiation are linked via wormhole to the inside of the black hole.

Superadiance — the extraction of energy from a rotating black hole — is also known as the Penrose Mechanism and is a precursor of Hawking Radiation — a quantum version of black - hole superradiance.

For information to be preserved, outgoing particles of Hawking radiation have to be entangled (quantum linked) to each other.

If boycott is such an outrageous idea, how can it be that a man of Hawking's calibre, making up his mind after due deliberation, could decide that in the circumstances it was the least bad option?

So the film is evidently not a complete picture of Hawking's world, either.

The closing sequence of Hawking is genuinely moving, cutting between his appearance in front of an ecstatic crowd at the opening of the 2012 Paralympic Games, an onstage lecture before an audience packed with admiring fans, and an intimate bonfire party at his Cambridge home.

Best, then, just to accept the book as a prosaic account of Hawking's life, and the film as a lyrical celebration of it.

In the 1970s, Hawking showed that black holes ultimately disappear due to energy leaking away in the form of Hawking radiation.

But what happens to this link and the information it holds when one of the pair falls in, leaving its twin to become a particle of Hawking radiation (see main story)?

In order to preserve information, it must become entangled with another particle of Hawking radiation.

Bekenstein had been studying the entropy problem and had reached a possible solution thanks to an earlier insight of Hawking's.

One school of thought holds that the information is preserved as the hole evaporates, and that it is placed into subtle correlations among these particles of Hawking radiation.