Sentences with phrase «of james»

I am led to conclude that in the thought and writing of James Reston we find an unmistakable civil religious orientation.

I believe the book of James should be removed from the canon.

There are also women looking on from a distance; among them was Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of James the younger and Joses, and Salome.

The book of James says that the prayer of a righteous man is powerful and effective.

The concept of «world» is another category that has received recent development, notably at the hands of James Robinson.

Both books raise the issue of the role of Christian attitudes toward Judaism, the primary subject of James Carroll's Constantine's Sword.

In the words of James T. Burtchaell, the provost of Notre Dame: «In these matters... we have no satisfying consensus not because we wrangle over them too much but because we wrangle not enough.»

I hardly knew him, but a few years later he wrote to say that my view of James 2:14 had changed his life and ministry.

James Herrick, Madurai, to Rufus Anderson, Boston, 18 February 1858, Transcript in the hand of James Herrick.

It is my contention that the thought and writings of James Reston, one of the nation's most prominent journalists, demonstrate that he has been a consistent and influential spokesman for the American civil religion.

While most of the contributors to this volume were somewhat neutral regarding Calvinistic interpretations, the chapters on The Letters of John and The Letter of James were the most blatant.

It is the book we know as the Epistle of James.

Nevertheless, I concur with Reynolds that Akyol's Muslim portrayal leans too heavily on outdated and problematic interpretations of Christian origins that pit a Hellenistic Paul against the supposed Jewish Christianity of James.

That the Epistle of James was written to be thus published, however, that is, that it is an «epistle» in the literary sense of the word, is very improbable in view of its contents, which relate to no single subject or situation.

This vulgarly practical and relativistic theory of truth perhaps most closely approximates the current, popular sense of the word «pragmatic,» and one can find warrants for it in the writings of all the pragmatists, even including some of James».

It would be convenient to say that he was driven to this by the determinisms of rationalistic idealism or positivistic empiricism; but there is little evidence that James lived and breathed those epistemological issues (as many of James's disciples do today) or felt their control enough to be driven by them alone to a state of depression.

He accepts and adopts many of James» key insights, and then goes on to develop them in rich and rigorous detail.

(And he wasn't a fan of the Epistle of James or the book of Revelation.)

Here they are (from various Gospels in the King James version): ««Joanna the wife of Chuza Herod's steward,» «Mary the mother of James and Joses,» «Salome,» «Susanna,» and the anonymous «mother of Zebedee's sons.»

No example of what worries him is clearer than the case of James Arthur Ray, a self - help guru who led a crowded sweat lodge ceremony that left three people dead.

Our pastor has been in the book of James for a number of years now.

Whether it be Wieman's general appropriation of James's «knowledge by acquaintance» in Religious Experience and Scientific Method, Meland's «appreciative awareness,» or Loomer's more narrative forms of gathering evidence, each purports merely to describe, but then evinces that the description is driven by rather specific personal and / or contextual definitions of what counts as religious experience.

The distinctiveness of James's empiricism is his insistence that one has not been empirical enough if he or she focuses on what is general in experience; rather, the full extent of experience comes only when one experiences this group, this person, this psychic phenomenon without excluding anything significant — even if, especially if, what is experienced can not be subsumed under some general characteristic.

For the philosophically and theologically inclined, it is important to keep the nature of James's crisis in mind.

Thirty odd years after this overview of twentieth century Catholic intellectual culture, the points of James Hitchcock seem even more relevant.

They are also misconstruing the meaning of James» statement.

Short comments that, «The novels of James Joyce ultimately disappoint... because they repudiate... [a] Catholic sacramental view of life.»

For instance, Abbotsford friends, House of James has been so supportive, so ask there!

These comments reflect many of the qualities of James's own novels.

@James What rights are you being deprived of James, we'll come right over and rectify the situation.

Ask mainliners and they will say that liberal Protestant men are certainly better husbands and fathers than are the conservatives who follow the blatant patriarchy of a James Dobson or Jerry Falwell.

We know little about either, although the death of James bar Damneus (Josephus, Antiquities 20.9) provides a basis for the colourful martyrdom of brother James beloved of Christian apologists.

There was no civil war in the early church between followers of James and followers of Paul, was there?

CEJ — Martin Dibelius, James: A Commentary on the Epistle of James.

For example, it was several hundred years before all parts of the Church accepted the Epistle to the Hebrews, and other areas of Christendom did not accept the Letter of James or the Book of Revelation for over 400 years.

The end quotation mark should not be until the end of James 2:19.

It was very encouraging to see this contextually defined presentation of the meaning of James 2 on the web.

Martin Luther, for example, that great reformer who battled the Catholic church over the issue of how to receive eternal life, called the book of James, «a right strawy epistle» meaning that there was nothing in it but wood, hay and stubble.

I just completed an extensive 6 month study of James 2:14 - 26.

He was so insistent on justification by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone, that he had trouble reconciling these truths with the teachings of James.

I just wanted to thank you for putting this contextually - defined interpretation of James 2.14 on the web.

If you carefully and thoughtfully work through the logic James» argument up to this point, and then look at the objection, you must include all of James 2:18 - 19 in the objection.

Numerous pastors and Bible scholars have noted that the book of James is similar in theme and message as the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew 5 - 7.

Since that sermon by Jesus serves as a description of summary of how His disciples should look and act, the same can be said of the book of James.

The book of James is one of my favorite books of the Bible.

This is a salvation - base, and works - based response to and application of James message.

One can see a similar phenomenon of «contemporizing» tradition in the development from Paul's letters to the Epistle of James (for what follows see CEJ).

So we've seen the historical - cultural context of James 2.

And if you were to do that with the book of James, you would discover that James tells these Jewish believers how to stand up under persecution.

The book of James specifically reminds us any other practice is a dead faith.