One common example
of a jury instruction in the criminal context would be when a judge explains to the jury that the refusal of a defendant to testify does not indicate guilt.
And the standard
set of jury instructions says that jurors must «apply the law in the case whether they like it or not.»
The court also declined to interpret Haslip to hold that due process requires the amount of a punitive damages award to be subject to postverdict or appellate review, and noted that Oregon courts are not powerless because they may vacate a judgment if there is no evidence supporting the jury's decision, and because appellate review is available to test the
sufficiency of jury instructions.
The second half
of this jury instruction states that, in determining this value, the jury is specifically not to consider the plaintiff's «grief, sorrow, or mental anguish, the decedent's pain and suffering, or the poverty or wealth of the plaintiff.»
The judge also instructs the jury on how the law affects the facts they are deciding, through the
use of jury instructions.
Provided research, briefing and trial support, including
drafting of jury instructions, trial brief, and motions in limine, in a case in Mayes County, Oklahoma, in which a defense verdict was obtained in favor of a loss prevention investigator who was an employee of a shoe retailer.
After a jury returned a verdict in favor of the doctor in a medical malpractice case, an estate executor appealed on two questions of abuse of discretion: limitations on the scope of questions during the defendant's deposition, and
refusal of jury instructions tendered by the plaintiff.
This broader sense of jury nullification is distinguished from cases where the jury sincerely tried to reach a correct verdict based upon the jury instructions but screwed up in their
interpretation of the jury instructions and / or their understanding of what happened factually.
It also noted that trial and appellate courts were «not entirely powerless» because a judgment may be vacated if «there is no evidence to support the jury's decision,» and because «appellate review is available to test the
sufficiency of the jury instructions.»
A federal appeals court on Monday upheld the bribery conviction of former Brooklyn Assemblyman William Boyland Jr. — despite acknowledging that
some of the jury instructions at his trial were technically wrong under the new rules.
I have broken
all of the jury instructions into a series of articles that are linked at the bottom of this page.
Almost all states, including New Mexico, have a model set
of jury instructions that a judge should to convey to the jury.