Not exact matches
Even the clergy who cling to the Democratic Party have trouble concealing their
lack of interest in
religion.
We don't yet know the implications
of having an atheist president, but if an atheist candidate ran, and people cited his
lack of religion as a problem, I bet SIlverman would cry murder.
It shows, not only the overall willful ignorance
of religion, but it clearly displays the
lack of regard for others it so staunchly claims as a tenet.
Just pointing out that
lack of religion doesn't lead to peace by any means.
Atheism only defines my
lack of belief in gods, I will stand up against people pushing their
religion in my face or the public square, instead
of keeping it in their homes and churches - the only two places it belongs.
3) bouncing from one to the next physically and emotionally abusive christian home 4) being bullied due to
lack of interest in sports and small stature 5) going to war and watching friends get hurt and / or die in combat 6) growing up being called a «devil worshipper» for not buying into
religion.
Based upon this story my guess is that
religion's main problem is an acute
lack of self - awareness.
Indeed, they do not, any more than religious folks, experience emptiness,
lack of purpose,
lack of pleasure or such negativity generally stereotyped to
religion - free people.
Hatred founded on a
lack of experience or understanding
of fellow humans is the worst any person can possibly be, and no nationality or
religion will make it otherwise.
> Far from being the problem,
religion and faith are the only things attempting to reign in people's
lack of self - control.
I do believe the church, not
religion and faith, has all but sealed their destiny with the
lack of action in protecting the most innocent (children).
This whole article is about
religion and yet you read it and are shoving your
lack of belief down others» throats.
Everybody persecutes everybody else for their
religion or
lack there
of.
It's ridiculous to suggest that the
lack of religion leads to wars as, again, the ridiculous centeredpiece suggests.
Obama has a record
of attending Christian churches I believe he is very careful to respect all
religions, beliefs, and the
lack there
of.
The problem, mique, is that the Christians (and some other
religions) believe that your actions or
lack of action (e.g., not properly worshiping their deity) can anger their god and bring his collective punishment upon everyone, so they think it's their civic duty to help you see the light and to legislate their ideas so that all must follow their ways (
of course, history shows they can't even agree among themselves what those ways are).
«To write on literature or art was considered an honorable occupation,» he wrote in 1997, «whereas any time notions taken from the language
of religion appeared, the one who brought them up was immediately treated as
lacking in tact, as if a silent pact had been broken.
I think a fast from verbosity about
religion may help the religious people to see how
religion - free people may indeed
lack nothing, but instead, their «envelope» is just a particular sort
of clothing — not necessary but fun for them perhaps.
500 years
of science never once bending to
religion is all the evidence anyone should ever need to prove the absolute
lack of truth and divinity in monotheism.
Milosz often sensed a
lack in his own faith, and he confesses this in the Treatise, as elsewhere (see «Distance,» below): «Why not concede,» he asks, «that I have not progressed, in my
religion, / past the Book
of Job?»
What they would say is that they have theories in explaining how the universe started (string theory) and skepticism towards
religion and its
lack of facts.
Just as Christians have no right to enforce their
religion on the unwilling, the unwilling have no right to enforce their
lack of religion on those that believe.
Atheism is the
lack of religion.
HUNDREDS
OF YEARS of torturing people and burning them at the stake because of their religion or lack of i
OF YEARS
of torturing people and burning them at the stake because of their religion or lack of i
of torturing people and burning them at the stake because
of their religion or lack of i
of their
religion or
lack of i
of it.
There is more than one
religion in the world, and this blog is open to all regardless
of belief or
lack of belief.
Members
of the major
religions base their activities (or
lack thereof) on their particular faith.
However, I do not think that a person's
religion or
lack of religious belief should exclude him or her from political office.
Pretty simple concept regardless
of your
religion or
lack of.
You shrill ignorance, your hatred
of anything different, your bigotry and
lack of knowledge
of even your own
religion, your stunning
lack of education regarding basic science and history, and now your attacking the men and women
of the military?
Making ignorant statements aggregating the irrational and radical behaviors
of extremist groups to an entire
religion is evidence for a
lack of education and a
lack of sensitivity to diversity.
Atheism is not
religion, it is
lack of religion.
I think you're unwilling to tolerate differences in opinions, practices, or beliefs (intolerant), strongly partial to your own group,
religion, race, and politics and intolerant
of those who differ from you (bigot), and
lacking knowledge and information (ignorant) in our laws and why they exist.
Also, It doesn't matter if they have 4,000 members or 400 members, they just don't want
religion shoved in their faces from all
of the (for
lack of a better word) Holy Rollers.
There is not one person in the world today who really knows anything about it regardless
of their
religion or
lack of same.
Perhaps you should scurry along if reading this website is making you feel like people are pushing their
religion or
lack of religion upon you.
Judy — Your response is exactly what is wrong with this country, a
lack of respect, be it party affiliation,
religion or otherwise.
I personally don't care what you believe, but my
lack of belief in a divine being is not a
religion it is an acceptance
of the truth.
The author, who is a Professor
of Divinity at Yale, is sorely
lacking in basic understanding
of text and
religion.
Which regardless
of your
religion or
lack there
of, should be the main focus
of everyone's life.
Your inability to differentiate cults and
religions from real Faith and Trust in God and in Jesus Christ God's Only Son is a clear indication
of your absence and complete
lack of Faith and Trust in God and in Jesus Christ God's Only Son.
Every
religion, every belief (or
lack there
of) has a fringe.
No matter the
religion or
lack of it, no matter the country or the race, some people are just plain mean.
I thin
religion, or
lack of it is a persona matter, and generally don't care.
One
of the many reasons why Christians are mocked in their belief is because those who defend the
religion lacks knowledge, especially science.
Was it due to the
lack of religion or a weirdly self - centeredform
of religion?
Wow, I'm so impressed with how progressive you all are regarding your
lack of concern over a candidates
religion!
Those who bash Christ based on ignorance
of what he actually said (not is so called followers)
lack credibility and are usually hypocritical
of a lot more things in their lives than the topic
of religion.
@Good / Bad LOL I have never seen anyone, atheist or not, assume that the
religion or
lack of one instantly mean that they are for «viability» or anything else along those lines.
This kind
of religion «
lacks the biblical picture's resources and rigour, but it makes up for them in flexibility.
and your theory that
religion was created in order to control the masses betrays your
lack of imagination Paglia refers to as well as your fascination for conspiracy theories.