Sentences with phrase «of modern global warming»

Make no mistake: those are the surefire consequences of the modern global warming campaign waged by political and cultural elites, who have long ago abandoned fact - based science for dramatic fearmongering in order to push increased central planning.

That's the clear cause of the modern global warming despite what deniers claim.

Chirs Colese, you say, «Perhaps the reason why most skeptical discussions highlight 12 year old papers that are irrelevant to the attribution of modern global warming, or stolen emails, is that they don't actually have a scientific case to make?»

With all the doom and gloom of global warming alarmism, this unexpected truth of modern global warming being less than the pre-modern era is an indicator that man - made catastrophe is not just around the corner.

In fact, this analysis makes it clear that over 50 % of the modern global warming could be a direct result of the same natural climate forces that warmed the world prior to the 1950s.

The last 70 out of 300 years of Modern Global Warming are characterized by human - caused, extremely unusual, rapidly increasing CO2 levels.

Not exact matches

Habitat destruction, unchecked population growth, global warming and other challenges of modern civilization have put humanity at risk.

The rate at which carbon emissions warmed Earth's climate almost 56 million years ago resembles modern, human - caused global warming much more than previously believed, but involved two pulses of carbon to the atmosphere, University of Utah researchers and their colleagues found.

Of course, modern global warming stems from a clear cause — rising levels of CO2 (and other greenhouse gases) from fossil fuel burning, cutting down forests and other human activitieOf course, modern global warming stems from a clear cause — rising levels of CO2 (and other greenhouse gases) from fossil fuel burning, cutting down forests and other human activitieof CO2 (and other greenhouse gases) from fossil fuel burning, cutting down forests and other human activities.

Boulder, Colo., USA: Cretaceous climate warming led to a significant methane release from the seafloor, indicating potential for similar destabilization of gas hydrates under modern global warming.

Global warming in the modern era is being driven by increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, which leads to an enhanced greenhouse effect.

«Global temperatures have warmed significantly since 1880, the beginning of what scientists call the «modern record.»

If you think that, the modern world does not have such a problem as global warming at all and all the dreadful and frightening things we hear every day are just gossiping, and spreading word in order to make the people being afraid, confused, and puzzled, you can do nothing but ground your point of view in your persuasive essay global warming writing.

With the exception of evolution, few scientific endeavors have met with so much hostility in modern times as the scientific writing on global warming.

Thus you should look at the Vermeer & Rahmstorf (2009) study linked above, which correlates the tide gauge record with global mean temperature since 1880 and shows that the modern acceleration of sea level rise is closely related to modern global warming.]

-LSB-...] Moreover, this study highlights that modern glacier retreat on Kilimanjaro is much more complex than simply attributable to «global warming only», a finding that conforms with the general character of glacier retreat in the global tropics [Kaser, 1999]: a process driven by a complex combination of changes in several different climatic parameters [e.g., Kruss, 1983; Kruss and Hastenrath, 1987; Hastenrath and Kruss, 1992; Kaser and Georges, 1997; Wagnon et al., 2001; Kaser and Osmaston, 2002; Francou et al., 2003; Mölg et al., 2003], with humidity - related variables dominating this combination.

I've said countless times that peak oil and global warming are imminent and extremely serious problems, and yet people keep assuming that because I'm not predicting the fall of modern civilization in 10 years that I think it's all not that big a deal.

The flat period of temperatures after WW2 has been sufficiently explained by an extended period of industrial aerosols, and is before the modern global warming period anyway.

I particularly enjoyed the slides that, when combined (1) provided an overview of hotter and cooler CO2 molecules as it relates to how they are seen from outer space and from profile — because this will make it easier for me to explain this process to others; (2) walked through the volcanic and solar activity vs assigning importance to CO2 changes — because this another way to help make it clearer, too, but in another way; (3) discussed CO2 induced warming and ocean rise vs different choices we might make — because this helps point out why every day's delay matters; and (4) showed Figure 1 from William Nordhaus» «Strategies for Control of Carbon Dioxide» and then super-imposed upon that the global mean temperature in colors showing pre-paper and post-paper periods — because this helps to show just how far back it was possible to make reasoned projections without the aid of a more nuanced and modern understanding.

On July 23, I wrote about the rocky rollout, prior to peer review, of «Ice Melt, Sea Level Rise and Superstorms: Evidence from Paleoclimate Data, Climate Modeling, and Modern Observations that 2 °C Global Warming is Highly Dangerous.»

Global warming and energy supply isn't really that big a problem if we just let a few billion people die off and the rest live without most of their modern conveniences.

This is the linchpin: if the difference between pre-industrial and modern temperatures is not as dramatic as this analysis indicates — i.e. if modern GLOBAL temperatures are comparable to those of the Medieval Warm Period (named for a REGIONAL phenomenon)-- then there is little need for urgency.

As scientists looked for ways to get around the problem, critics of modern climate science dismissed the tree ring data as unreliable and accused scientists of cooking up tricks to support the theory of global warming.

This finding sparked a valuable discussion among scientists of how to consider, and communicate, drought risks related to human - driven global warming when truly monstrous dry spells — dwarfing anything in modern experience — are an underlying norm.

CAGW or Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming is the acronym used (mostly by those that don't support taking immediate action on climate change) for the theory (or collection of hypotheses) that attribute most of the observed modern warming to human activities and warn that continuing similar activities (mostly emitting CO2) could result in warming that is dangerous to both civilization and a number of ecosWarming is the acronym used (mostly by those that don't support taking immediate action on climate change) for the theory (or collection of hypotheses) that attribute most of the observed modern warming to human activities and warn that continuing similar activities (mostly emitting CO2) could result in warming that is dangerous to both civilization and a number of ecoswarming to human activities and warn that continuing similar activities (mostly emitting CO2) could result in warming that is dangerous to both civilization and a number of ecoswarming that is dangerous to both civilization and a number of ecosystems.

In fact, on this issue, you SHOULD be a modern - day Murrow when it comes to telling it like it is with respect to the need for coverage of this issue (global warming) to improve.

First transmitted on Channel Four / Equinox, December 2001 How changes to the world's forests and oceans could trigger a rapid acceleration of global warming 55 million years ago, something strange happened to life on Earth: many animals suddenly shrank, with horses becoming the size of modern domestic cats.

Gradually scientists, aided by science journalists, informed the minority of educated people that modern civilization might cause global warming, sometime far in the future.

It succeeds financially by fanning people's fears, by exaggerating, by blaming forest fires on global warming when they've really been started by countercultural individuals who believe «modern lifestyles... are unhealthy and out of harmony with the natural systems of planet Earth.»

Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are to blame for global warming since the 1970s and not carbon dioxide, according to new research from the University of Waterloo published in the International Journal of Modern Physics B this week.

LONDON, 14 July, 2017 — US scientists have just added a new dimension of horror to the modern airport experience: global warming could take heat wave temperatures to the point where it becomes simply too hot to fly.

2009 was tied for the second warmest year in the modern record, a new NASA analysis of global surface temperature shows.

It has been often said by climate skeptics that the modern warming peaked in 1998 and we are entering a period of decades of global cooling.

The following five reasons convince me that humans do NOT cause most of modern - day global warming.

-- Susan Solomon, Nature The Long Thaw is written for anyone who wishes to know what cutting - edge science tells us about the modern issue of global warming and its effects on the pathways of atmospheric chemistry, as well as global and regional temperatures, rainfall, sea level, Arctic sea - ice coverage, melting of the continental ice sheets, cyclonic storm frequency and intensity and ocean acidification.

July 2016 was the warmest July in 136 years of modern record - keeping according to a monthly analysis of global temperatures by scientists at NASA GISS.

In contrast, global warming warms nights faster (although the effect is slight) and winters faster than summer (which effect is not slight) so that modern US annually averaged temperatures are greater than those of the 1930s.

The evidence suggests that Modern Global Warming is within Holocene variability, but the cryosphere displays a non-cyclical retreat that appears to have undone thousands of years of Neoglacial ice advance.

If you're referring to modern sensitivity, Steven, I would agree because it is so strongly influenced by the high rate of global warming, creating a huge gap between theoretical and observed sensitivity.

That, of course, further weakens the case for a modern maximum explanation for global warming.

In 2016, an examination of the peer - reviewed scientific literature has uncovered dozens of paleoclimate reconstructions that reveal modern «global» warming has not actually been global in scale after all, as there are a large number of regions on the globe where it has been cooling for decades.

Proposed supporters of climate alarmism methods to combat global warming by reducing carbon dioxide emissions are not only scientifically unfounded - in the absence of extraordinary characteristics of modern climate change, but also incredibly expensive in economic terms.

Bob, I think the notion of a modern grand maximum which provides a hand - waving mechanism for natural variability to explain all the global warming that occurred late last century is hard for AGW skeptics to give up.

January 2018... in 122 (2017) scientific papers Image Source: Loisel et al., 201 2017: 150 Graphs, 122 Scientific Papers In the last 12 months, 150 graphs from 122 peer - reviewed scientific papers have been published that undermine the popularized conception of a slowly cooling Earth temperature history followed by a dramatic hockey - stick - shaped uptick, or an especially unusual global - scale warming during modern times.

The confluence of the twin issues of Native American respect for the land and modern environmentalists» alarm over global warming has met in resistance to a North Dakota oil pipeline, observed Ann Wright.

What Felix Vasquez Jr. said when reviewing Life of Pi also applies to AGW theory in the modern world of Western academia — i.e., proponents of global warming endorse the notion of blind faith, and denial as a positive character trait.

The initial title of «Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms: evidence from paleoclimate data, climate modeling, and modern observations that 2 °C global warming is highly dangerous» had the final phrase changed to «could be dangerous.»

that global warming threatened the very existence of modern civilization.

In addition to running climate models, the researchers compared modern warming to similar temperature increases that happened approximately 120,000 years ago in a period known as the Eemian, when global sea level was 5 to 9 meters (between 16 and 30 feet) higher than it is today due to the release of glacial water.

The standard modern estimate of climate sensitivity — 3 °C, plus or minus 1.5 °C — originates with a committee on anthropogenic global warming convened in 1979 by the National Academy of Sciences and chaired by Jule Charney.