Sentences with phrase «of pt»

And Mom did lift the dishwasher into the back of her PT Cruiser (with the help of Mr. Previously - Loved Dishwasher) in 94 degree weather, while yours truly stood in the garage and told Mrs. Previously - Loved Dishwasher about all the disgusting things we found behind our old dishwasher when we moved it out of the house.

And Mom did do a 6 - point turn at the top of the really steep driveway so that she could drive backwards up another driveway, so that the back of her PT Cruiser was facing the garage door of the sweet family with the previously - loved, stainless steel GE Profile dishwasher.

I think PT boards, like on a deck, look a lot better than 4x8 sheets of PT plywood.

The PT lineup swells for ’03 with the arrival of the PT Turbo, which offers plenty of extra performance.

Other work using brief versions of PT (e.g., Turner and Sanders 2006; Berkovits et al. 2010) yield findings consistent with those reported here.

A change in dysfunctional parental attributions should be considered as a possible mediator in the context of PT.

Very often the success and effectiveness of PT relies on how much work the parents put in at home.

Although the programmes for each are quite separate, there are common underlying focusses of PT, which are consistency, child support, and spending as much quality time with children as possible.

A wide variety of PT programmes are available and evidence from systematic reviews [20, 21] shows that they improve a range of outcomes including parent and child well - being, parent — child interactions, decreased maternal depression and stress and child non-compliance and aggression.

This is an actual resume example of a PT Assistant who works in the Nursing Aides and Attendants Industry.

I'm a Doctor of Chiropractic with 23 yrs as TEAM coordinator of pt care.From intake (History and exam) to treatment plans.I determine a patients functional outcomes via accepted medical protocols.Most of my experience is in multidisciplinary environments (Physical Therapist, Medicine, Nutrition, Accupuncture.

From verifying patient information and updating records to facilitating treatment plans and monitoring patient progress, my background in supporting comprehensive aspects of PT care has prepared me to excel in this role.

With my previous experience assisting across a full range of PT functions, complemented by my dedication to providing outstanding patient care and support, I believe I could swiftly surpass your expectations for this role.

Pro Tip: You may have millions of PT skills.

In those circumstances, one needed to examine Ch I of Pt I to see if there was a statutory provision which reversed the normal effect of that defective notice.

Section 78F of Pt IIA of EPA 1990 provided: «(ii) Subject to the following provisions of this section, any person, or any of the persons, who caused or knowingly permitted the substances, or any of the substances, by reason of which the contaminated land in question is such land to be in, on or under that land is an appropriate person.

The authority of the year on the workings of Pt 36 is Gibbon v Manchester City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 726, [2010] All ER (D) 218 (Jun).

The judgment in Green was endorsed by the Court of Appeal in Director of the Assets Recovery Agency (Costs) v Szepietowski, The Times, 21 August 2007, [2007] All ER (D) 364 (Jul) and so is now considered settled law in relation to the requirements of Pt 5 of POCA.

To attract the Pt 36 penalties, the basic requirements of a Pt 36 offer are set out in Pt 36.2.

The «qualified» aspect lies in the need to control behaviour (including maintaining the benefits of Pt 36 as a means of settling claims) and to address those occasional cases where the claimant has substantial means and the defendant does not.

The only authority that the UK had to introduce national measures to give access to nationals of an A8 state to its labour market in place of Art 39 EC was that which was given to it by para 2 of Pt 2 of Annex XII.

The provisions of Pt 5 of POCA 2002 were considered by the Administrative Court in R (on the application of the Director of the Assets Recovery Agency) v Green, The Times, 27 February 2006, [2005] EWHC 3168 (Admin).

Perhaps now that there is at long last a detailed consideration of Pt 18, there can be a reduction in the time spent by parties demanding premature disclosure and evidence.

The procedural stay will not prevent a court from enforcing the terms of a Pt 36 offer or dealing with cost issues that may arise, r 36.11 (5).

An offeree can, as before, seek clarification of an offer within seven days of a Pt 36 offer being made.

It must be in writing and must also: (i) state on its face that it is intended to have the consequences of Pt 36; (ii) specify a «relevant period» (as defined by r 36.3 (c) and usually of not fewer than 21 days) within which the defendant will be liable for the claimant's costs in accordance with r 36.10, if the offer is accepted; (iii) state whether it relates to the whole of the claim or to part of it or to an issue that arises in it and if so to which part or issue; and (iv) state if it takes into account any counter-claim.

The answer was found in para 2 of Pt 2 of Annex XII to EU (A) A 2003.

His recent experience includes advising Starbucks on its $ 1.3 bn buy - out of its East China joint venture and the simultaneous sale of Starbucks» interest in President Starbucks Coffee; advising Hutchison Telecommunications on the US$ 1.86 bn sale of its fixed line business, HGC, to I Squared Capital — named Hong Kong Deal of the Year at FinanceAsia Awards 2017; advising Japan Tobacco International on US$ 1bn acquisition of PT.

Section 15 (1) substitutes a new para 6 of Pt 1 of Sch 1, BA 1976 and provides that if defendants are 18 years or over and it appears to the court that, having been released on bail in or in connection with the proceedings for an offence that carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, they failed to surrender to custody, they may not be granted bail unless the court is satisfied that there is no significant risk that, if released on bail, they would fail to surrender to custody.

On learning of the Pt 36 offer which the rueful defendant failed to accept, the judge applies the automatic uplift so now the claimant collects # 55,000.

FrA 2006 sets out to rationalise the situation through the creation of the broad fraud offence in s 1, which was the subject of Pt 1 of this article (see NLJ, 9 February 2007, pp 212 — 213).

Drafted to add certainty to the process, the decision in Godwin led to a complete redrafting of Pt 6 (see Godwin v Swindon Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 1478, [2001] 4 All ER 641).

The decision in Carver, however, has ridden through Pt 36 with a swathe of uncertainty and more recently there appear to be differing views as to the effect of a Pt 36 offer as «accord and satisfaction» of the claim (see Carver v BAA Plc [2008] All ER (D) 295 (Apr), [2008] EWCA Civ 412).

Now we hear from Professor Regan that Jackson LJ may consider a complete rewrite of Pt 36.

At this point one would have expected the judge to declare BAA's Pt 36 offer «beaten» for the purposes of Pt 36.14.

He, too, made similar findings in relation to the application of Pt 35 which, he said, controlled the giving of evidence by experts as defined in r 35.2.

It was contended that M was a «former relevant child» for the purposes of Pt 3 of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) because she had previously been «looked after» by the social services in the exercise of their functions under ChA 1989.

Such a confinement would be contrary to the plain wording of both Pt 44.3 (2)(b) and Pt 44.3 (6).

Reconciliation of Pt 36 and a regime where a losing claimant would not ordinarily be liable for costs is but one blatant source of difficulty.

However, as his lordship understood the wording of Pt 44.3, a judge's discretion was not to be confined to a choice between making either an order that the unsuccessful party had to pay the successful party's costs, or making an «issues based» order for costs.

Just a day after that statement was made it had to be amended due to an incorrect reference to the effect of Pt 36.

There is much in the Act which has survived, in particular the personal protection provisions of Pt IV and the impetus given to mediation by Pt III.

The usual order would be for the defendant to pay the claimant's costs to the date of expiry of the Pt 36 offer.

«Yes» according to the Court of Appeal's interpretation of Pt VI of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988) in both EUI Ltd v Bristol Alliance Ltd Partnership [2012] EWCA Civ 1267, [2012] All ER (D) 120 (Oct) and Sahin v Havard & anor [2016] EWCA Civ 1202, [2016] All ER (D) 21 (Dec).

That clearly showed that it was not a case where in the words of Pt 1,

The question of a child's «understanding» is the subject of Pt 3.

Interestingly, the section of EqA 2010 that grants employment tribunals jurisdiction to hear complaints concerning the breach of EqA 2010 has different wording than that contained in SDA 1975, and may be wider: s 120 (1) gives the employment tribunal jurisdiction to «determine a complaint relating to — a contravention of Pt 5 (work)».

The offeror needs the court's permission — sought by way of Pt 23 application — to withdraw or to vary the offer terms to the disadvantage of the offeree during the acceptance period.

The offer — which can be made before as well as during the currency of proceedings (CPR 36.3 (2)-RRB--- must be in writing, state on its face that it is intended to have the consequences of Pt 36, state whether it relates to the whole claim or only part, and whether or not it takes into account any counterclaim, and specify a period of not less than 21 days within which the defendant will be liable for the claimant's costs if the offer is accepted (the acceptance period), so the offeror can allow for more than 21 days or subsequently agree to extend (CPR 36.2).

Second - class bankruptcy in the form of a debt relief order (DRO) arrives on 6 April 2009 by dint of Pt 7A of the Insolvency Act 1986 (which is inserted by the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, s 108) and a plethora of subordinate legislation.