Sentences with phrase «of second amendment»

As strong supporters of the Second Amendment, we believe that gun ownership is an important American symbol of freedom and liberty.

Gun owners and supporters of the Second Amendment, you've come to the right place!

We're known for our work in the Stolen Valor arena, but sometimes we talk about politics, most of us are supporters of Second Amendment rights and we talk about that.

Second, educate America on the dark side of the Second Amendment's history.

He focused on the meaning of the Second Amendment and studies that showed assault rifle bans reduce shootings

«They should demand a repeal of the Second Amendment,» he wrote.

«The positions I hold on these issues of the Second Amendment, I've held since the day I entered office in the city of West Miami as an elected official,» Rubio said.

In the process, they also called out the National Rifles Association (NRA), the most outspoken organization advocating of the second amendment.

Many attendees didn't have the slightest clue about guns or details of the Second Amendment.

Comedian Larry the Cable advised those calling for a repeal of the Second Amendment to consider «history» and Judge Alex Kozinski's succinct summary of the importance of the individual right to keep...

Whether these statements have been sincere or just parroting propaganda, they have perpetuated a false understanding of the Second Amendment that has paralyzed state legislatures and Congress from taking steps to restrain gun violence and improve public safety.

They receive money and advice from smart adults, some of whom stepped up their efforts to reduce gun violence after Congress brushed off the Sandy Hook Slaughter as the price of the Second Amendment.

The NRA, target of much of the protesters» anger, posted a statement on its Facebook page accusing marchers of allowing themselves to be manipulated by opponents of the Second Amendment.

NRA fires back, 11:44 a.m.: The National Rifle Association, target of much of protesters» anger, posted a statement on its Facebook page accusing marchers of being manipulated by opponents of the Second Amendment.

The National Rifle Association filed a lawsuit against the new law in federal court almost immediately after it was signed, contending the bill's ban on gun sales to those under 21 was a violation of the Second Amendment.

In a world where absolutist views of the Second Amendment have prevented the most common - sense measures to prevent mass shootings, we have little hope that Wednesday's tragedy in Florida will make a difference.

A voter deemed neurotic might be shown a gun - rights commercial featuring burglars breaking into a home, rather than a defense of the Second Amendment; political ads warning of the dangers posed by the Islamic State could be targeted directly at voters prone to anxiety, rather than wasted on those identified as optimistic.

Following a controversial New York Times editorial by former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens Tuesday calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment, we asked readers to respond, offering not only the news of Stevens» stance, but also a Chicago Tribune editorial taking the other side of...

Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens — a member of the court's liberal wing during his 35 years on the bench — called for the repeal of the Second Amendment in an op - ed piece published in the New York Times Tuesday.

The efforts by Hogg and his impressive peers have resulted in one of the retired Supreme Court Justices calling for repeal of the Second Amendment.

«They should demand a repeal of the Second Amendment.»

In the guns case, however, Justice John Paul Stevens performed his own analysis of the original meaning of the Second Amendment and dissented, suggesting that divining the meaning of the amendment when it was written is a close call.

California, Iowa, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, and New York are the only states that do not have a provision in their state constitutions mirroring or significantly reflecting the provisions of the Second Amendment (although New York has a civil rights law containing something almost the same as the Second Amendment).

Denniston writes that a grant of cert is «quite likely» because of conflict between the circuit courts on the meaning of the Second Amendment.

As to whether the Supreme Court will accept the individual right view of the Second Amendment, Volokh says, «Now that's a mystery.»

Nickles mentioned Dellinger and Goldstein by name and said D.C. Solicitor General Todd Kim and others in the attorney general's office would also be considered to replace Morrison as the oral advocate in the case, which will mark the first time in nearly 70 years that the Supreme Court will directly address the meaning of the Second Amendment's right to «keep and bear arms.»

In District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court is expected to interpret the meaning of the Second Amendment, which says, «A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.»

President Trump has made it evidently clear he is a true follower of the Second Amendment and whilst throughout his campaign he would shun Hillary Clinton for threatening to take away citizens» rights for protection and freedom, we can all silently acknowledge the fact that the NRA endorsed him during his campaign, as they do with 98 % of Republicans [4].

Where Scalia wrote, «Since those discussions took place 75 years after the ratification of the Second Amendment, they do not provide as much insight into its original meaning as earlier sources,» WordRake would change that to, «Since those discussions took place 75 years after the ratification of the Second Amendment, they provide as little insight into its original meaning as earlier sources.»

For instance, the story's protagonist, Neil Blastman, is a firm supporter of the Second Amendment who grew up playing with toy guns and watching television westerns like Gunsmokeand Bonanza.

On illegal guns, they extol the virtues of the Second Amendment, which is all well and good, but let's get serious: protecting the Second Amendment does not stop you from keeping illegal guns out of the hands of criminals.

Twin Radius presents a new multimedia installation from the Atlanta - based artist that addresses the history of the second amendment, gun control and violence in the US.

I wouldn't say that you should invest in guns for the monetary return, but rather for the possible retraction of the second amendment right.

Asked about the state's response to the mass shooting at Broward County's Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, DeSantis said he would have approached a school - safety bill, which included new restrictions on gun sales, «differently because I think it scapegoated law - abiding citizens in terms of their Second Amendment rights.»

Have students read op - eds from multiple perspectives, review research on previous gun control measures, and discuss interpretations of the Second Amendment.

First, there was the text of the Second Amendment, which plainly states that «the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.»

The subject of the movie is lobbying in Washington, D.C.. It's specifically about the political battle between those who believe that there is room within the Constitution to enact regulations on the ownership of firearms and those who take the final four words of the Second Amendment — «shall not be infringed» — as the only language in it that really matters.

Starts out as an inspired test case for the continued necessity of the Second Amendment, and only near the end does it lose some of its tightly concentrated focus.

It may not come as surprising news to many of you that the United Nations doesn't approve of our Second Amendment.

They're the people who buy framed copies of the Second Amendment to hang in their homes.

Overturning that decision via a constitutional amendment to get rid of the Second Amendment would be simple and would do more to weaken the N.R.A.'s ability to stymie legislative debate and block constructive gun control legislation than any other available option.

The association approved a resolution that says the SAFE Act is a violation of the Second Amendment of the Constitution and that it infringes on the rights of citizens in the state without due process.

The County Legislature voted, 7 to 4, on Thursday to approve a resolution calling on the state to repeal and revise the New York State SAFE Act of 2013 «in a manner that is respectful of the Second Amendment rights of New Yorkers.»

The Legislature's Republican majority has voiced its opposition to the SAFE Act since it was enacted in January; in February, it passed a resolution condemning the law, claiming it is in violation of the second amendment.

Donald Trump speaks to a crowd of Second Amendment advocates rallying against the NY SAFE Act Tuesday, April 1, 2014, at the Empire State Plaza in Albany, N.Y. (Lori Van Buren / Times Union)

She is still a proponent of the Second Amendment but has since argued that the amendment does state that weapons can be regulated.

(WBEN) The Erie County Ethics Board has ruled that there was no violation of their rules when Erie County Sheriff Tim Howard appeared in uniform at a Niagara Square rally April First and spoke in favor of the second amendment and President Donald Trump.

A coalition of second amendment advocates and others in New York are forming a new political movement to get what they say are disaffected and disenfranchised New Yorkers to vote, possibly in primaries against incumbent state lawmakers.

«My opponent is the biggest enemy of the Second Amendment in the entire Congress,» said Long.

McGahay cited the lawmaker's «principled defense of the Second Amendment, her strong support for our veterans and military service members, our farmers and small business owners.»