Not exact matches
Those against raised the specter
of abuse (there are several questionable agents in Writer Beware's files who soak their clients for
billable hours while doing little or nothing to place manuscripts with reputable publishers), the loss
of agents» entrepreneurial edge if they got paid no matter what (the fact that the agent profits only when the writer does is at the heart
of the
traditional author - agent relationship); and,
of course, the possibility that only wealthy writers could afford to have agents.
Is this deliberate on the part
of the vendors to cater to the
traditional law firm culture
of the
billable hour?
Tying this back into the evolving billing model that is emerging in the legal sector, this may mean sacrificing a bit on the
traditional billable hour model in order to make sure the client is happy with the cost
of your services, as well as the quality.
Nadia Haque, Associate, Radiant Law: Haque explains that even if she is ambitious and wants to succeed, she does not want to do so in the environment
of a
traditional law firm and its focus on
billable hours.
For example, there is the usual agonising over the future
of the
billable hour and a reference to the debate about whether the
traditional law «Cravath» pyramid model
of legal partnerships — these are issues causing distress to lawyers all around the world.
«Plainly, the imposition
of budget discipline on law firm matters forces firms to a very different pricing model than the
traditional approach
of simply recording time and passing the associated «costs» through to the client on a
billable -
hour basis [italics supplied by me].»
Although she loved the work that she did and the awesome clients she served, Radiance realized that she was not a fan
of the
traditional law firm or
billable hour model, and neither were her clients.
I have written before about how lawyers can use unbundling as part
of a marketing strategy for their law firms to differentiate themselves from
traditional full - service law firms that stick to the
billable hour model.
Indeed, the practice and business
of law lives up to the old adage that «time is money,» and survey respondents report that, on average, 72 percent
of their fees are based on the
traditional billable hour model.
Much
of modern practice requires software intervention, and it is only natural for today's client - cum - consumer to expect technology will afford them some savings and relief within the
traditional billable -
hour model.
Finally, the
traditional way
of pricing legal services is based upon
billable hours, or time spent.
he has a bird's eye view
of how pricing pressure and other changes are shattering the
traditional practice model centered around the
billable hour and paper - intensive workflows.
Instead, often due to budget restrictions from clients, attorneys now perform 80 % to 90 %
of their work outside
of what we know as the
traditional billable hour, shifting to more task - based billing.
This impedes on a large percentage
of billable hours (see above) a
traditional legal firm would impose on a client.
Matters are increasingly moving away from the
traditional billable hour to various types
of alternative fee agreements.
Plainly, the imposition
of budget discipline on law firm matters forces firms to a very different pricing model than the
traditional approach
of simply recording time and passing the associated «costs» through to the client on a
billable -
hour basis.
If you follow my blog, you know I am a fan
of disrupting
traditional methods
of practicing law, which includes the billing method, a.k.a the infamous
billable hour.
The
traditional models
of adversarial advocacy, all - or - nothing representation and the
billable hour that have proved profitable — albeit to a diminishing extent — for this generation
of lawyers are not acceptable to sophisticated millennial consumers.
Billable Hour + Floor and Ceiling: This approach keeps the traditional billable hour as the base but protects both us and the client in case the volume of the work proves to be greater or smaller than anti
Billable Hour + Floor and Ceiling: This approach keeps the traditional billable hour as the base but protects both us and the client in case the volume of the work proves to be greater or smaller than anticipa
Hour + Floor and Ceiling: This approach keeps the
traditional billable hour as the base but protects both us and the client in case the volume of the work proves to be greater or smaller than anti
billable hour as the base but protects both us and the client in case the volume of the work proves to be greater or smaller than anticipa
hour as the base but protects both us and the client in case the volume
of the work proves to be greater or smaller than anticipated.
Many
of our clients are no longer able to afford the
traditional billable hour, in - office rates
of even the smaller law firms and solos.
Sure, most associates may still have minimum
billable hour requirements, but general attitudes about compensation seem to be shifting toward models where the killer gets less than the
traditional lion's share in order to feed the less voracious members
of the pride.