There will be an intensified demand for the kind of apologetic which gives up the notion of religious certainty, and attempts to rally the sporting spirit of our compatriots in
favour of a balance of probabilities.
While the Court of Appeal is seized with the duty of re-examining the evidence in order to be satisfied that no such error occurred, it is not, in my view, a part of its function to substitute its
assessment of the balance of probability for the findings of the judge who presided at the trial.
The appellate court must not retry a case and must not substitute its views for the views of the trial judge according to what the appellate court thinks the evidence establishes on its
view of the balance of probabilities.
There will be an intensified demand for the kind of apologetic which gives up the notion of religious certainty, and attempt to rally the sporting spirit of our compatriots in
favour of a balance of probabilities.
Even though the trial judge used the wrong and higher standard
of balance of probability, the Court of Appeal still dismissed... Continue reading →
A much more reasonable option is a lawsuit against Taxi driver and taxi company for an act of negligence, which only need be proven to the civil standard
of a balance of probabilities.
[78]... [B] efore drawing an inference of causation against the hospital, the trial judge was required to consider the relevant evidence and to make findings, on the standard
of a balance of probabilities, eliminating the prospect that the earlier period of asphyxia was not detectable.
In my opinion, before drawing an inference of causation against the hospital, the trial judge was required to consider the relevant evidence and to make findings, on the standard
of a balance of probabilities, eliminating the prospect that the earlier period of asphyxia was not detectable.
Currently, abuse of dominance need only be proven on the civil standard
of balance of probabilities.
The test, a reasonable degree of likelihood, falls below the civil standard
of the balance of probabilities and even further below the criminal standard of beyond reasonable doubt.