ICC arbitration
of a breach of contract dispute arising from an investment banking transaction in Korea.
Not exact matches
Qualcomm likely would oppose Apple's efforts to consolidate the cases, since it views its
dispute with iPhone / iPad makers as a
breach of contract action.
In this case, that's pretty easy to prove: If Ellora's Cave
breached its
contract with Ann Jacobs by failing to timely pay royalties, that is a question
of fact that is common between this action and the DA v. EC
dispute.
You and Velocity Micro agree that any claim,
dispute, or controversy, whether in contract, tort or otherwise, and whether pre-existing, present or future, and including statutory, common law, intentional tort and equitable claims («Dispute») against Velocity Micro, its employees, agents, successors, assigns or affiliates arising from, in connection with, or relating to this Agreement, its interpretation, or the breach, termination, or validity thereof, the relationships which result from this Agreement (including, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, relationships with third parties who are not signatories to this Agreement), Velocity Micro's advertising or any related purchase SHALL BE RESOLVED, EXCLUSIVELY AND FINALLY, BY BINDING ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED BY THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION under its Code of Procedure then in
dispute, or controversy, whether in
contract, tort or otherwise, and whether pre-existing, present or future, and including statutory, common law, intentional tort and equitable claims («
Dispute») against Velocity Micro, its employees, agents, successors, assigns or affiliates arising from, in connection with, or relating to this Agreement, its interpretation, or the breach, termination, or validity thereof, the relationships which result from this Agreement (including, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, relationships with third parties who are not signatories to this Agreement), Velocity Micro's advertising or any related purchase SHALL BE RESOLVED, EXCLUSIVELY AND FINALLY, BY BINDING ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED BY THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION under its Code of Procedure then in
Dispute») against Velocity Micro, its employees, agents, successors, assigns or affiliates arising from, in connection with, or relating to this Agreement, its interpretation, or the
breach, termination, or validity thereof, the relationships which result from this Agreement (including, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, relationships with third parties who are not signatories to this Agreement), Velocity Micro's advertising or any related purchase SHALL BE RESOLVED, EXCLUSIVELY AND FINALLY, BY BINDING ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED BY THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION under its Code
of Procedure then in effect.
Governing Law: Client and Mulcoy Travel agree that these terms and conditions, or any claim,
dispute or controversy (whether in
contract, tort, or otherwise, whether preexisting, present or future, and including statutory, common law and equitable claims) between client and Mulcoy Travel arising from or relating to these terms and conditions, interpretation thereof, or the
breach, termination or validity thereof, the relationships which result from the tour, advertising by Mulcoy Travel, or any related purchase shall be governed by the laws
of the State
of California without regard to conflicts
of laws rules.
Binding Arbitration: ANY CLAIM,
DISPUTE, OR CONTROVERSY (WHETHER IN
CONTRACT, TORT, OR OTHERWISE, WHETHER PREEXISTING, PRESENT OR FUTURE, AND INCLUDING STATUTORY, COMMON LAW, INTENTIONAL TORT AND EQUITABLE CLAIMS) BETWEEN CLIENT AND Mulcoy Travel, its respective agents, employees, principals, successors, assigns, or affiliates arising from or relating to these terms and conditions, interpretation thereof, or the
breach, termination or validity thereof, the relationships which result from the tour (including, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, relationships with third parties who are not parties to these terms and conditions), Mulcoy Travel's advertising, or any related purchase SHALL BE RESOLVED EXCLUSIVELY AND FINALLY BY BINDING ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED BY THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION (AAA) under its Code
of Procedure then in effect.
«Commentary on litigation in the Windy City on topics such as business litigation,
breach of contracts, fraud, building defects, real estate
disputes, nursing home abuse, medical malpractice, auto accidents, truck crashes, dog bites, employment discrimination and class actions.»
When a
dispute arises over a party's performance, our San Diego
breach of contract attorneys can work to achieve a satisfactory resolution through
contract litigation or other means.
Representing entrepreneurs and emerging businesses in
disputes involving
breach of contract, fraud and indemnification claims.
Mr. Boyajian helps clients involved in all manner
of business
disputes, including litigation
of professional liability matters, business torts,
breach of contract claims, and shareholder
disputes.
Sole Arbitrator in shareholder
dispute involving valuation
of a stock put,
breach of contract, and
breach of fiduciary duty
Mr. Wish's trial practice includes a concentration on complex commercial litigation, and he has successfully tried a number
of business
disputes involving
breach of contract, unfair and deceptive trade practices, and business torts in both state and federal courts.
Representing an equipment leasing company in a
contract dispute against an assignor
of leases alleging
breach of a perfect pay provision and a $ 25 million guaranty under the terms
of an assignment agreement.
Concentrating on litigation, including business
disputes,
breach of contract actions, officer and director liability, securities litigation, professional liability, trade secret litigation, elder abuse actions, and select personal injury matters.
in contractual
disputes including
breach of contract,
breach of trust, and misrepresentation claims
His experience includes
breach of contract, trademark and trade dress infringement, unfair competition and trade secret
disputes and real estate related litigation, including development, construction defect and land planning challenges.
The Reinartz Law Firm handles a wide range
of civil and business matters, including commercial litigation,
breach of contract, shareholder and partnership
disputes, and more.
Disputes with insurance carriers, including bad faith,
breach of contract and wrap policy coverage
Mr. Carter has successfully tried numerous cases and represented companies and individuals in a wide variety
of matters, including complex business
disputes involving claims
of breach of contract, fraud, unfair and deceptive business practices, and franchise
disputes.
Business litigation includes several types
of business - related claims, such as
breach of contract, partner
disputes, shareholder
disputes, IP enforcement, employment claims, derivative actions, and more.
He also litigates business
disputes and dissolution,
breach of fiduciary duty and
breach -
of -
contract claims.
Civil litigation can include claims such as business
disputes,
breach of contract, personal injury, real estate
disputes, and much, much more.
Our commercial litigation practice includes, but is not limited to, lawsuits involving
Breach of Contract;
Breach of the Covenant
of Good Faith and Fair Dealing;
Breach of Fiduciary Duty; Negligence; Fraud; Common Counts; Declaratory Relief; Specific Performance; Unfair Business Practices and partnership
disputes.
He has also successfully represented clients in lease
disputes, an EEOC lawsuit and a
breach of contract dispute with a
breach of contract dispute with a District
of Columbia agency.
He has handled complex commercial
disputes, shareholder derivative litigation, declaratory judgment actions, and has secured emergency injunctions relating to claims for
breach of contract, fiduciary duties, fraud and professional negligence.
Mr. Porada's experience includes complex
breach of contract cases and business torts, as well as monopolization claims, oil and gas controversies, and insurance coverage
disputes.
Prior to joining Lewis Wagner, Eric represented corporate and individual clients in civil litigation matters involving
breach of contract claims, shareholder
disputes, real estate
disputes, aviation matters, property and casualty litigation and general tort litigation.
Commercial
contract disputes, landlord and tenant matters,
breaches of warranty, fraud, insurance coverage, investor and owner
disputes and application
of non-competition agreements — you name it, we've got it covered.
Through the years, we have represented clients in all types
of business
disputes, and are ready to assist in matters such as
breach of contract, fraud, tortious interference, and unfair business practices, among others.
Lamar is an Eastern North Carolina injury lawyer whose practice areas include insurance bad faith, fraud or unfair business acts, catastrophic personal injury, medical malpractice, car accidents, defective products, business
disputes,
breach of contract actions, property
disputes, collections or money
disputes, and shareholder, partnership and membership
disputes.
Of wage & hours,
contract breach, performance management, disciplinary, redundancy or maternity issues, which incites the most
disputes in businesses and why do you think this is?
During his 21 - year legal career, Mr. Goldberg has litigated hundreds
of cases in federal and state courts throughout the United States involving claims
of retaliation, discrimination, wrongful termination, fraud, defamation,
breach of fiduciary duty, and
breach of contract, as well as commercial
contract disputes, civil RICO, ERISA, trade secrets and restrictive covenants, corporate governance
disputes, minority shareholder
disputes, partnership
disputes, Madoff counseling and defense, advancement and indemnification proceedings, whistleblower actions (SOX and CEPA), executive compensation counseling, litigation, and arbitration, international litigation and arbitration, antitrust litigation and arbitration, products liability litigation, environmental and toxic tort litigation, and securities fraud.
The drafts I propose here are for transactional
disputes, and specifically for AODR that generates arbitral awards in the millions
of claims for debt and
breach of contract.
Jeff J. Bowen (Madison) is a member
of the Insurance Coverage Litigation practice and has represented a wide range
of clients in commercial litigation, arbitration, and insurance matters, including insurance recovery, patent and copyright
disputes,
breach of contract actions, and regulatory matters.
Obtained summary judgment in client's favor on
breach of contract claim involving a
disputed loan between members
of a family business.
Mr. Gunderson also has testified on damages in
breach of contract disputes.
On the other hand,
disputes that involve
contract disputes or
breaches, including licensing agreements may be outside the jurisdiction
of the Federal Court and can only be brought in the provincial court.
Regarding business
disputes, the firm has extensive experience defending its clients against a wide variety
of claims, as well as initiating meritorious action against bad actors in fraud,
breach of contract, and collection matters.
When issues are
disputed, our intellectual property specialists will help using their extensive knowledge
of settling domain name,
breach of contract, infringement and negligence claims.
Mr. Baker has experience in all areas
of the litigation process in commercial
disputes involving false advertising claims, trademark and trade dress infringement claims, copyright infringement claims, data privacy claims, patent infringement claims, art ownership and acquisition claims, trade secrets, right
of publicity / privacy claims, consumer protection statute claims, and
breach of contract claims.
Katharine also acts for investors in respect
of regulatory
breaches by their advisors and companies prosecuting and defending general commercial claims, including
breach of contract and complex shareholder
disputes.
He has experience in collections (writs
of attachment and possession and receiverships), equipment and vehicle leasing, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, Truth in Lending Act, Unfair Competition Law, Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Commercial Code (sales, negotiable instruments and secured transactions), banking, mortgage lending and shareholder
disputes, insurance, First Amendment and privacy matters,
breach of contract, labor, business torts, intellectual property (trademark and copyright), eminent domain, foreclosures, and other real estate matters.
Michael Muse - Fisher represents public and private companies in a variety
of state, federal and administrative cases involving
contract disputes, commercial litigation, licensing and intellectual property matters, eminent domain / inverse condemnation, government tort liability,
breach of fiduciary duty, as well as land - related torts.
Therefore, the
disputed matters were the amount
of compensatory damages for
breach of contract and plaintiffs» fraud (and punitive damage) claims.
Stephen Riden has extensive experience litigating business
disputes involving
breach of contract, fraud, unfair competition, trade secrets, noncompete agreements, and healthcare claims.
Tamara has represented movie studios, technology and production companies, actors and newspapers in
contract negotiations and
breach of contract disputes, trademark litigation, copyright litigation, right to publicity, patent infringement, licensing
disputes and related intellectual property litigation.
Mediated
dispute between author and media company giving rise to claims to
breach of contract, promissory estoppel, fraudulent inducement and negligent misrepresentation
In addition to his national trade secrets and noncompete litigation practice, Russell's practice concentrates on complex business litigation, including high - tech matters, copyright infringement matters, trademark
disputes, unfair competition claims, business - to - business matters, and
breach of contract claims.
Among others, Mr. Ferdinand's experience includes, appellate litigation; bankruptcy adversary proceedings; bid protests, debarments, and appeals;
breach of contract and Uniform Commercial Code claims; broker
disputes; commercial landlord - tenant actions, including commercial evictions; condominium association litigation; consumer fraud and deceptive trade practices act claims; corporate governance; directors» and officers» claims; ethics and professional liability; health law; injunctions; insurance issues; lien claims, including commercial and residential construction liens; planning board actions; post-judgment collection; restrictive covenants; shareholder and partnership
disputes; and shareholder derivative claims.
Obtained recovery
of over $ 1,000,000 on behalf
of an ice cream manufacturer in a
breach of contract action arising from a
dispute involving a distribution agreement.