You'll see our estimates
of carbon tax revenues by clicking here and clicking the link in the fourth paragraph.
I like the
idea of a carbon tax because it makes use of a highly developed infrastructure that we sometimes don't remember to consider.
This is partly because the penalties imposed by governments in the
form of a carbon tax or charges for pollution permits are so low that there is no incentive for carbon capture.
Some have claimed energy costs would rise
because of a carbon tax, but little attention has been given to what would happen to food costs.
What
level of carbon tax is necessary to ensure that at some time in the future the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere will stabilize?
But: what
kind of carbon tax would you need to make a serious dent in carbon output, of the order that we need to deal with climate change?
Actually, I am becoming optimistic about raising the price of fossil fuels with some
sort of carbon tax.
The
advantage of carbon taxes relative to binding emissions reductions is particularly applicable to countries with weak governance structures.
The second graph shows, among other things, how brown coal emissions in particular have increased since the
removal of the carbon tax.
Reading about the repeal
of the carbon tax with no effective measures to reduce carbon emissions in its place just makes my heart sink.
While some progress is being made on a progressive
version of a carbon tax, congestion - pricing advocates were hell - bent on a flat fee.
In other words, the public dialogue seems very ill - prepared to consider the pros / cons
of carbon tax vs. cap - and - trade, at least at this point.
The only
virtue of carbon taxes is that if carefully done they can be more efficient than administrative regulations.
The vast majority of people have no knowledge or
understanding of carbon taxes and many of them are looking for any excuse available to continue not knowing.
The portion
of carbon tax paid by corporations would impact their shareholders, which again indirectly impacts upper - income taxpayers disproportionately.
[38] We chose a revenue - neutral carbon tax in which 100
percent of the carbon tax revenues are returned directly to taxpayers.
«The certainty and
transparency of a carbon tax that is revenue - neutral will drive innovation much faster than the uncertainties of carbon trading,» he said.
This means that the
bulk of carbon taxes will be paid, directly or indirectly, by families of above - average means.
Phrases with «of a carbon tax»