Sentences with phrase «of a child in a divorce case»
Traditionally, mothers have gotten primary custody of the children in divorce cases, even if fathers are seeking to gain more time with their children.
boylefeinbergfamilylaw.com
Both parents and Virginia courts are primarily concerned with what is in the best interests of the child in a divorce case.
CLC's trainings explore issues such as collaboration between attorneys and social workers to focus on the mental health of children in divorce cases, and the differences between psychological and psychiatric evaluations.
Alabama law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as practically possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case because the court believes both parents should be permitted the ability to develop and maintain a meaningful relationship with their child despite the end of the marriage.
With increasing numbers of children in divorce cases during the late 1960s and 1970s, major reform objectives were based upon psychological theories of parenthood and the best interests of the child to counter the presumption of mother as sole custodial parent.
New Hampshire law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Dr. Drutman's forensic psychology consultation to attorneys consists of educating family lawyers on psychological issues in family law cases, trial consultation and preparation to cross-examine mental health professionals, reviews of mental health provider evaluations, and expert court testimony on issues related to the best interest of children in divorce cases.
Colorado law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Oklahoma law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Iowa law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as practically possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Vermont law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Tennessee law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as practically possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Wisconsin law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as practically possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
The law in Hawaii permits parents to share as equally as possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Montana law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as practically possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Nebraska law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Ohio law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
New York law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as practically possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Idaho law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Maine's child custody law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Florida law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Mississippi law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Kentucky law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Texas law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as practically possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
New Mexico law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as practically possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case, so joint custody is considered beneficial for the child.
Missouri law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as practically possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Maryland law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as practically possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
The District of Columbia law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as practically possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Michigan law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Georgia law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Pennsylvania law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Kansas laws express a preference for parents to share as equally as practically possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
West Virginia law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as practically possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Arkansas law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Arizona law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Delaware law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
Indiana law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.
New Jersey law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as practically possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case.